- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bucks have “heavy interest” in Jose
Posted on 1/30/25 at 5:19 pm to Macintosh
Posted on 1/30/25 at 5:19 pm to Macintosh
quote:
fantasy island
It’s not that big if an ask. Jose is on a great contract for the next couple years, especially to a team like Milwaukee who is in the second apron.
Also, should have clarified, the swap would be a worst of Portland/Milwaukee pick as they already have their swaps tied up, so it’s not really that valuable.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 5:20 pm to Dantheman504
quote:You think 50% of 2nd round picks become rotation players?
Probably a 50% of being better?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:39 pm to Fun Bunch
MERCY...if a possible trade of Jose can stir up this much action...I hate to think what's gonna happen when the Pels trade Herb Jones in the not too distant future. I see no universe... where Herb is still a Pelican 2 years from now.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 9:08 pm to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
Dinky Mulberry
You come to Pelicans Talk praying to find a Brandon Ingram trade and see this crap. Can you really blame us at this point?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 9:38 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
You come to Pelicans Talk praying to find a Brandon Ingram trade and see this crap. Can you really blame us at this point?
I holding out hope that after we clean house...we hit the jackpot on those ping pong balls...at which point...we snatch Flagg & he's as good as I think he's gonna be...THEN...we're on a fast track to being serious playoff contenders...at which point I could see the Pelicans feeling justified in keeping Herb.
A desperate plan...by a desperate man.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 10:22 pm to Dinky Mulberry
I just want to be good enough to not have to trade away our Jrue Holiday’s and Jose Alvarado’s cause we want to suck more. That’s a low bar. Literally just want to be competitive.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 10:23 pm to Dinky Mulberry
Jose is a solid player on a reasonable contract. So of course Pels talk wants to trade him for two second round pics, which are worthless.
Retarded.
Retarded.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 10:49 pm to ShamelessPel
quote:
Your whole argument is predicated on draft position. What does Jose being an UFA in 2021 have to do with his player value now? If anything, being an UFA has been a POSITIVE for his value because he’s dirt cheap salary wise
He does keep repeating this. Not sure why, it doesn’t matter where yiu drafted. It’s like saying hey since Jokic was drafted in the 2nd, we should give them 4 2nds since that’s twice his original value and that will give them 4 chances to find the same exact player. So they should make the trade….
I don’t think anyone here would trade him for two 2nds. Or anyone that had any sense, which might be half this board. That’s a garbage return, so you just hang on to him. Stupid argument if you ask me.
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 1/30/25 at 11:15 pm to Dantheman504
quote:In fairness, you're exaggerating also, you just don't have the self awareness to realize it.
Y'all really want to exaggerate his overall impact and value
You claimed there's probably a 50% chance a 2nd round pick would be better than Jose, when the fact is that 72% of 2nd round picks since 2000 either never play a single game or play very sparingly but never make a rotation consistently.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:05 am to shel311
I think that "blowing up the team" and trading Jose are counterintuitive. Jose, and maybe Murray are the only "dawgs" on the team (Herb is great and gives a ton of effort, but he's probably too reserved to be a proper "dawg", and to my knowledge has never given Zion/BI shite for being pussies). If we are trading the likes of Zion, BI, and Herb, then Jose is pretty important to keep. We would need someone to instill pride into the youngins that we replace those key players with.
Unless we get offered something crazy, a ton of posters here have covered the other reasons not to trade him. Simply put:
-he's a fan favorite, and you need to at least pretend that you're satisfying the masses
-his return likely won't exceed his production + intangibles + low cost.
Unless we get offered something crazy, a ton of posters here have covered the other reasons not to trade him. Simply put:
-he's a fan favorite, and you need to at least pretend that you're satisfying the masses
-his return likely won't exceed his production + intangibles + low cost.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 9:34 am to goatmilker
Thought the Bucks are one of the nine hard capped teams. The Bucks can't add salary without the Pels taking back a player of equal or more salary.
Why would the Pels want to add salary to increase taxes? There has to be more than Jose.
Why would the Pels want to add salary to increase taxes? There has to be more than Jose.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 10:45 am to ErikGordan
I don't know.
I do know I do want to give him away for 2nd round picks.
I do know I do want to give him away for 2nd round picks.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 11:20 am to shel311
quote:
In fairness, you're exaggerating also, you just don't have the self awareness to realize it.
You claimed there's probably a 50% chance a 2nd round pick would be better than Jose, when the fact is that 72% of 2nd round picks since 2000 either never play a single game or play very sparingly but never make a rotation consistently.
Understood. It was a slight exaggeration.
As said right above I understand not wanting to trade a fan favorite. But if the reason we keep Jose is
quote:then that's nuts. If keeping Jose is what "satisfies the masses" then we are fricked as a franchise and deserve them laughing in our face.
you need to at least pretend that you're satisfying the masses
What everyone seems to keep ignoring is that the CHANCE of upgrading from Jose with future assets is almost equal to his future value even at 0.
I highly doubt we pay Jose for his next contract and if we don't get another all star level player in a trade this year then we are surely spending next season building chemistry with our players instead of "contending".
So what we keep him for a year to make people feel better and trade him next year anyway as an expiring?
He is not the difference maker in contending or make/break.
quote:
his return likely won't exceed his production + intangibles + low cost.
Everyone keeps saying this but what does he do that's so special and can't be replaced?
Jose: 21.7min/ 9.3pts/ 4ast/ 1.9reb/ 1.3stl
Boston: 23.7min/ 10.7pts/ 3.2ast/ 2.3reb/ 1.3stl
Oh look we can trade Jose, get 2 future 2nds for free, and replace his production without even using the 2nds or changing our roster. Lol
Why? Because there's nothing special about Jose from a skill level and whatever "irreplaceable production" y'all keeping telling yourself he has is being pulled out your arse.
The only "special" quality Jose has is that he is a hard worker and absolutely grinds on the court. Which I 100% respect and its the reason I do love him as a player.
And although I love Jose I'm not dumb enough to believe that a guy that has to/ and does work harder than everyone else with a career avg of 7.7/ 2.8/2.1 is "special" or has production that can't be replaced.
There is nothing irreplaceable about a guy that works the hardest he possibly can to avg 8/2/2.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:12 pm to Dantheman504
Ex: You have a business with employees solely based on quotas.
Some employees reach their quotas with ease.
1 specific employee works harder than the other employees but reaches the same quota at the same time.
Do you respect that hard working employee? Hell yeah of course. Do you admire that employees work? Yes of course.
Is that employee special or bring anything extra?frick no.
Its pure respect for that employee. Would you want to replace that hard working employee with a lazier employee that can do the same thing? Probably not and that's understandable.
Do you actually lose anything tangible by replacing that worker? No you actually don't.
Jose is a minimum impact player with maximum production.
No disrespect towards Jose but his "special" qualities are in regards to his work ethic and not his work production. A bottom level employee with average returns and an above average work ethic is very replaceable.
And having a special work ethic with average production is far away from a "special player" or employee.
Some employees reach their quotas with ease.
1 specific employee works harder than the other employees but reaches the same quota at the same time.
Do you respect that hard working employee? Hell yeah of course. Do you admire that employees work? Yes of course.
Is that employee special or bring anything extra?frick no.
Its pure respect for that employee. Would you want to replace that hard working employee with a lazier employee that can do the same thing? Probably not and that's understandable.
Do you actually lose anything tangible by replacing that worker? No you actually don't.
Jose is a minimum impact player with maximum production.
No disrespect towards Jose but his "special" qualities are in regards to his work ethic and not his work production. A bottom level employee with average returns and an above average work ethic is very replaceable.
And having a special work ethic with average production is far away from a "special player" or employee.
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:56 pm to Dantheman504
If you took this scenario to Bosses in most other businesses/ industries with the relative level of employee status Jose has and argued any level of importance towards future impact of the company they'd probably laugh their fricking asses off.
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:58 pm to shel311
quote:
You think 50% of 2nd round picks become rotation players
No I think there's atleast a 50% chance that between (2) 2nds and min contracts that we can replace a trifling 8/2/2 stat line.
I'm more like 80% sure considering we already have Brandon Boston exactly comparable and drafted Herb in the 2nd.
Actually it seems like all you have to do is draft another "hard worker/ grinder" type player.
Naji, Jose, Herb just in the last few years. We could probably sign another undrafted player with a chip on his shoulder and get the exact same results.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:11 pm to Dantheman504
Dude, you are losing your shite and arguing with a wall over people not wanting to trade a fan favorite for a pile of shite and 2 rolls of toilet paper. Lighten up, Francis.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 4:37 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Dude, you are losing your shite and arguing with a wall over people not wanting to trade a fan favorite for a pile of shite and 2 rolls of toilet paper. Lighten up, Francis
That about sums it up. Well that, and the pure ignorance to think what Jose brings this team is simply whatever his stat line says. And that he brings no intangible value beyond that stat line.
Popular
Back to top

0






