Started By
Message

re: Bad contracts that we can trade for and get assets

Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:00 am to
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19528 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:00 am to
If the Hornets are going to max out Kemba, I am sure we could get some firsts for taking Batum or Marvin Williams off of their hands.
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2755 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:02 am to
1 year guys don't make sense, would rather save the cap room and not make the playoffs, and keep the pick in the lottery next year.

4 years doesn't make sense unless your goal is to make the finals in three seasons with that player being your 3rd best player. Probably unrealistic.

That leaves the 2-3 year guys, can't really afford Paul, I would prioritize shooting which means I would hold my nose and choose Hardaway or Batum. Both would only make sense if they help support playoff trips to gain postseason experience for the young guys.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103930 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:02 am to
Most of these are expensive as hell, which you won’t get proper value to eat, or the teams don’t have the right assets to trade out.

Ex - Washington has their own firsts but little else and I don’t see an interim GM sending out future firsts to dump Mahinmi.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36213 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:06 am to
Some team will make a push to get a free agent and have to shed some salary (and future picks) to make the money work.

That being said, I don’t want a 4 year bad contract. 3 maybe. 2 year bad contract, okay. 4, No!
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14036 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Blake Griffin - 3 years, 100 million


I think he would be fun. He apparently loves shooting in the Blender he hit like 7 3's against us last year.

Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1880 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:17 am to
It also doesn’t have to be giant contracts, we could also get some smaller contracts that teams that are right on the edge of signing a FA need to dump, or on the edge of luxury tax. Then still have some leftover to target mid-level FAs

For example, I could see Orlando moving John Isaac over Gordon in order to get enough to resign vucevic. Or looking at being a dumping place for OKC’s smaller guys like Roberson rather than Adams. Maybe we can pry Richardson out of Miami or take a flyer on Monk from Charlotte. Portland is up against the cap, would they be willing to move Harkless for cap relief?

Teams over the cap to target:
OKC, Miami, POR, GSW, DET

Teams on the edge looking to make room for FA:
LAC, CHA, ORL, PHI, MIL

Will be interesting to see where we go from here
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
10432 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:37 am to
I don’t want anything to do with any deals past two years, really. Certainly not in FA signings but preferably not in taking bad assets either. Next offseason has practically no FAs, but the next (2021) is pretty loaded. I think for now the plan should be, spend the next two years developing the young core and then try to make a splash in 2021. So we need to try not to cut into that 2021 cap as much as possible.

Obviously this plan could shift depending on how our young player development goes, but I think something like this should be what we’re looking at with what we have now.
This post was edited on 6/21/19 at 10:38 am
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19528 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:52 am to
I hope we target another wing. It is great to have Ingram now, but he is a RFA and we have nothing behind him.
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6956 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Steven Adams - 2 years, 53 million


There is no way OKC breaks up the Westbrook/George/Adams core before the end of Adams' contract. It just isn't going to happen.

And we need spacing on this team big time, not a traditional C who can't shoot. Adams does a lot very well, but his skillset does not match our needs.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26665 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:03 am to
quote:

The hope is you take on a bad contract attached to a playable player. SoLo is not a playable player, so he was just a black hole.


Or take a shite player on a shite contract that nets you a valuable asset, like draft picks.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:05 am to
Any thoughts on Jeff Teague?
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19528 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:14 am to
Just added Teague to the list...would be a good get, but not sure if Pacers would move off of him.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38261 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:14 am to
Ain't want none of this.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6112 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:17 am to
I love Gallo, but I'm not intrigued by anyone else on your list

This is how I'm looking at our current situation.

We're not going to compete for a championship right now. But for now, you want to build culture. For now, you want to make the playoffs, at least for Jrue. For now, you want to surround your young guys with great veterans. BUT you don't want to strap your cap down the line.


this is my formula = leadership + talented vet that helps us compete + short-term contract (2-3 years)


for example, Kevin Love & Blake Griffin aren't the worst, they allow us to compete now & I think both would be solid leaders, but those are massive contracts & have a lot of years left. If I was going to take max money, I want Al Horford because I think he'd help us compete & would be a great leader for the young guys. But I don't think a max player is a smart use of our cap space & I suggest we'd be a top destination for him. Gallo is a good player, don't know about his leadership, but he did play on a great team in the LAC. He helps us compete and he's on short-term money.
This post was edited on 6/21/19 at 11:21 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103930 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:28 am to
I had liked the idea of Teague earlier this offseason.

At this point, though, I am more interested in front court players than another guard.


If we are just eating his $18m expiring deal in exchange for assets, I’m OK with it provided it doesn’t cost us a big man in some form or fashion.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103930 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:29 am to
Pacers?

Unless he moved last night, Teague is a Timberwolf.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37047 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:31 am to
quote:

There is no way OKC breaks up the Westbrook/George/Adams core before the end of Adams' contract. It just isn't going to happen.


Check this out.

LINK

quote:

And we need spacing on this team big time, not a traditional C who can't shoot. Adams does a lot very well, but his skillset does not match our needs.

I don't think this team is contending in the next 2 years. Adams can help develop both Hayes and Zion. IMO, that matters more than fit. We can still land another stretch 4/5.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68365 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:35 am to
Has Kris Dunn not amounted to much?
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
10128 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:36 am to
quote:

There is no way OKC breaks up the Westbrook/George/Adams core before the end of Adams' contract. It just isn't going to happen.



They put him on the block for a reason. He got abused in the Portland series. If you have a big that cannot guard the step back 3 on a pick and roll on defense and can't space on offense, he is going to get played off the court in the playoffs.
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
10128 posts
Posted on 6/21/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:

I don't think this team is contending in the next 2 years. Adams can help develop both Hayes and Zion. IMO, that matters more than fit. We can still land another stretch 4/5.


I don't think we are contending for 2 years so let's build in a really inefficient manner? You know who can develop Hayes and Zion? Our coaches.

Investing $25M/yr in a traditional center with how the NBA is developing is signing Asik all over again. If we bring in Adams, then we develop Hayes/Zion to beocme comfortable playing with a traditional center. I think that it forms bad habits and is not something we want to do.

Also if Adams ends up a huge locker room presence/mentor for those guys, what do you do with him in 2 years? Just let him walk? Or pay him money as his skills become less and less useful.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram