- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Beatles of the 21st Century
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:56 am to blueslover
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:56 am to blueslover
The Shitty Beatles
0
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:59 am to LoveThatMoney
Incubus
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:04 am to jrous19
The correct answer is something closer to that, IMO.
And Bieber is definitely solo Lennon. All the songs are about girls and love and all that cheesy pop bullshite.
And Bieber is definitely solo Lennon. All the songs are about girls and love and all that cheesy pop bullshite.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:05 am to Stonehog
quote:
girls and love and all that cheesy pop bullshite.
you obviously know nothing of John Lennon's solo work.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:43 am to blueslover
Wilco. Many of their songs are Beatles-esque...
Posted on 4/1/12 at 11:54 am to jrous19
quote:
Incubus
Hahahaha
Posted on 4/1/12 at 12:10 pm to Oswald
quote:
Message Posted by Oswald Wilco. Many of their songs are Beatles-esque...
What he said.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 12:19 pm to TheDoc
so back where I started...
NOT what groups of the past decade or so sound like the Beatles, or no comparison to the Beatles in accomplishment.
Thinking of who the Beatles matured to as musicians- Abbey Road, All Things Must Pass, Lennon solo, Wings, etc...
Now take those guys being early 20's in the late 90's/2000s instead of the early 60's. What direction or what kind of group would they have become? What groups of that era reflect similar musical genes?
That was my QOTSA/Homme suggestion... great vocals, creative writing, not afraid to experiment, good guitar riffs but not especially lead driven, some rebellious in your face fukkit attitude.
Oasis is another you can see many of those same traits in. Radiohead very good as experimenters pioneering new sounds. Not quite enough straight rock tho
NOT what groups of the past decade or so sound like the Beatles, or no comparison to the Beatles in accomplishment.
Thinking of who the Beatles matured to as musicians- Abbey Road, All Things Must Pass, Lennon solo, Wings, etc...
Now take those guys being early 20's in the late 90's/2000s instead of the early 60's. What direction or what kind of group would they have become? What groups of that era reflect similar musical genes?
That was my QOTSA/Homme suggestion... great vocals, creative writing, not afraid to experiment, good guitar riffs but not especially lead driven, some rebellious in your face fukkit attitude.
Oasis is another you can see many of those same traits in. Radiohead very good as experimenters pioneering new sounds. Not quite enough straight rock tho
Posted on 4/1/12 at 12:27 pm to blueslover
quote:
That was my QOTSA/Homme suggestion... great vocals, creative writing, not afraid to experiment, good guitar riffs but not especially lead driven, some rebellious in your face fukkit attitude.
Sounds like wilco, except wilco is a million times better than QOTSA/Homme.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 12:48 pm to rutiger
There are no beatles of the 21st century.
commercially, you could make the argument for coldplay, but I don't know if any of their records are on the level of Sgt. Pepper, White album, revolver, etc...
commercially, you could make the argument for coldplay, but I don't know if any of their records are on the level of Sgt. Pepper, White album, revolver, etc...
Posted on 4/1/12 at 12:55 pm to Stonehog
quote:
And Bieber is definitely solo Lennon. All the songs are about girls and love and all that cheesy pop bullshite.
LOL wow. So much FAIL here it's pathetic
Posted on 4/1/12 at 3:32 pm to Marciano1
quote:
And Bieber is definitely solo Lennon. All the songs are about girls and love and all that cheesy pop bullshite.
I guess you've never heard Imagine by John Lennon, have you?
Posted on 4/1/12 at 3:59 pm to rutiger
quote:
Sounds like wilco, except wilco is a million times better than QOTSA/Homme.
Amen, brother!
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:33 pm to Marciano1
quote:
Correct
The Beatles were geniuses. There is NO ONE in the music business today with 1/8 of the talent the fab four had.
So yes, no one is the correct answer.
Pft.... Classic Beatles fanboy response.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 9:40 pm to blueslover
in terms of what?
i'd say the raconteurs
i'd say the raconteurs
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:26 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Pft.... Classic Beatles fanboy response.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:28 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
The Beatles were geniuses. There is NO ONE in the music business today with 1/8 of the talent the fab four had.
So yes, no one is the correct answer.
You speak the Gospel truth, sir.
quote:
Pft.... Classic Beatles fanboy response.
Classic response for someone who has no taste in music
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:31 pm to beezylsu
I love The Beatles. They are in the running for my favorite band ever, but even I thought the 1/8 comment was a bit over the top.
Posted on 4/1/12 at 10:40 pm to The Seaward
okay 1/8 is strong but he was making a point.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News