- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Nirvana vs. Smashing Pumpkins
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:10 pm
I feel that there careers are very similar up to Kurt's Suicide and SP's Mellon Collie album.
Nirvana Bleach (B) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Gish (B+): Both are very raw debuts but with a lot of potential and you can hear both bands' future sound coming through. Both are very solid albums, but I have to give the edge to the Smashing Pumpkins here since it seemed more polished, which was probably due to Butch Vig as the producer.
Nirvana Nevermind (A) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Siamese Dream (A-): Both albums are produced by Butch Vig and are considered to be sellout albums for both bands as they are heavily produced with a lot of over dubbs. As much as it pains me to say it, I have to give the edge to Nevermind because of the ground that it broke by breaking into the mainstream. Siamese Dream rode the coattails of Nevermind, but is a great album in its own right.
Nirvana Incesticides (B+) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Pisces Iscariot (B): Both are b side compilations that most bands would drool over. I don't consider these b sides at all as there are a lot of great songs on these albums and would be considered A material for a lot of other bands. Have to give the edge to Incesticides since they are all original Nirvana songs and Pisces Iscariot includes about 3 covers.
Nirvana In Utero (A-) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness (A): Both albums are kind of a mix between their obscure roots and mainstream success. Smashing Pumpkins gets the nod here since it was a double album with very little filler and no two songs sounding anywhere close to the same.
What say you Music Board.
Nirvana Bleach (B) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Gish (B+): Both are very raw debuts but with a lot of potential and you can hear both bands' future sound coming through. Both are very solid albums, but I have to give the edge to the Smashing Pumpkins here since it seemed more polished, which was probably due to Butch Vig as the producer.
Nirvana Nevermind (A) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Siamese Dream (A-): Both albums are produced by Butch Vig and are considered to be sellout albums for both bands as they are heavily produced with a lot of over dubbs. As much as it pains me to say it, I have to give the edge to Nevermind because of the ground that it broke by breaking into the mainstream. Siamese Dream rode the coattails of Nevermind, but is a great album in its own right.
Nirvana Incesticides (B+) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Pisces Iscariot (B): Both are b side compilations that most bands would drool over. I don't consider these b sides at all as there are a lot of great songs on these albums and would be considered A material for a lot of other bands. Have to give the edge to Incesticides since they are all original Nirvana songs and Pisces Iscariot includes about 3 covers.
Nirvana In Utero (A-) vs. Smashing Pumpkins Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness (A): Both albums are kind of a mix between their obscure roots and mainstream success. Smashing Pumpkins gets the nod here since it was a double album with very little filler and no two songs sounding anywhere close to the same.
What say you Music Board.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:14 pm to RedHawk
Hmm. Much tougher than expected.
Musically I think they are about the same, but Nirvana's legacy is greater so I guess them. Also, Smashing Pumpkins terrible live show I saw in 2007 might have something to do with it. Probably the most disappointing show I've seen. It sounded like shite.
Musically I think they are about the same, but Nirvana's legacy is greater so I guess them. Also, Smashing Pumpkins terrible live show I saw in 2007 might have something to do with it. Probably the most disappointing show I've seen. It sounded like shite.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:17 pm to Souljah
quote:
Also, Smashing Pumpkins terrible live show I saw in 2007 might have something to do with it. Probably the most disappointing show I've seen. It sounded like shite.
Yeah, that wasn't a good year. Hear the shows are much better now and Billy is in a lot better mood, but he should be that way all the time when charging fans for a ticket.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:17 pm to Souljah
Smashing Pumpkins seemed to be going for a bigger sound than Nirvana. Mellon Collie and even Siamese Dream sound like big arena rock. Nirvana was popular while still keeping a more indie sound.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:19 pm to Brosef Stalin
Both have incredible drummers, but Vig really did a great job producing that certain drum sound.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:21 pm to RedHawk
Smashing Pumpkins in a walk. Nirvana is one smash game changer, three neat little songs. three great covers and a bunch of filler.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:30 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Nirvana is one smash game changer, three neat little songs. three great covers and a bunch of filler.
nirvana isn't my favorite band or anything, but you've got to be kidding me
Posted on 7/18/12 at 9:56 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Smashing Pumpkins in a walk. Nirvana is one smash game changer, three neat little songs. three great covers and a bunch of filler.
WOW
Posted on 7/18/12 at 10:07 pm to RedHawk
Nirvana required more of a commitment on the listener's part, but you eventually "got it."
Conversely, you could tell on the first listen Siamese Dream was special.... And it never got old, overplayed, or overhyped. Best album of the 90's IMO.
I give the edge to SP.
Conversely, you could tell on the first listen Siamese Dream was special.... And it never got old, overplayed, or overhyped. Best album of the 90's IMO.
I give the edge to SP.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 10:08 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Smashing Pumpkins in a walk. Nirvana is one smash game changer, three neat little songs. three great covers and a bunch of filler.
wow. just wow. SMH
Posted on 7/18/12 at 10:11 pm to Dandy Lion
Oh, shite. He di'int say that.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 10:11 pm to TheDoc
quote:Nope. I could be off on the neat songs part, but not by more than a couple.
but you've got to be kidding me
Posted on 7/18/12 at 10:15 pm to Les Cajones
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, uh, my opinion, man.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 11:06 pm to AlxTgr
I applaud your balls brotha...I'll stick my neck out there too. Nirvana is a very overrated band. Talented, yes. But overrated
Posted on 7/19/12 at 12:51 am to Spaulding Smails
Nirvana in a cake walk...
Posted on 7/19/12 at 2:40 am to TFTC
Both have shitty singers in a time that accepted their terrible talent.
Posted on 7/19/12 at 2:42 am to mikeMD
quote:
Both have shitty singers in a time that accepted their terrible talent.
Ehh, both were decent bands. Nirvana played some pretty good music, as did SP. Neither were great, but both deserve to be mentioned.
Posted on 7/19/12 at 4:16 am to RedHawk
I prefer SP, personally. I tried getting into Nirvana into high school but that didn't last a long time. I still like Unplugged in New York a whole lot. That's pretty much the only Nirvana CD I play anymore. I'm much more likely to pop in Gish or Siamese Dream.
Posted on 7/19/12 at 5:02 am to RedHawk
Courtney Love slept with members of both bands. Both bands are horrible. Kurt Cobain was the Vanilla Ice of that music movement. Billy Corigan is a whiny primadonna.
I dont like either band.
I dont like either band.
Popular
Back to top

7







