Started By
Message

re: Nirvana vs. Smashing Pumpkins

Posted on 7/19/12 at 7:32 am to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88052 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 7:32 am to
quote:

I still like Unplugged in New York a whole lot.
The covers are great. Thank goodness for The Meat Puppets.
Posted by trillhog
Elite Membership
Member since Jul 2011
19407 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 7:59 am to
my vote is smashing pumpkins, i still listen to the Adore album pretty regular when i'm chilling out.
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35652 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Smashing Pumpkins in a walk. Nirvana is one smash game changer, three neat little songs. three great covers and a bunch of filler.
agree and disagree at the same time.


nirvana is a historically more important band, imo, but the pumpkins were the better band overall. had kurt not suck-started a shotgun, nirvana might be the clear cut winner, but he did and they aren't. the impact that they had was greater than their music and i think people let that influence their opinion
This post was edited on 7/19/12 at 8:36 am
Posted by Standing ona beach
Gulf Coast
Member since May 2012
485 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, uh, my opinion, man.
.

Valid opinion

I pick the Pumpkins as well
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88052 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:07 am to
quote:


nirvana is a historically more important band, imo, but the pumpkins were the better band overall.
Total agreement.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:11 am to
Kurt was a much better songwriter than corgan.

SP were better musicians however.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88052 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Kurt was a much better songwriter than corgan.
People say this when comparing Kurt to lots of people. I've never seen this statement backed up in any way. Their most iconic song was a bunch of gobbly-asian. Kurt was a fairly poor songwriter.
Posted by gjackx
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2007
16587 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Kurt was a much better songwriter than corgan.

I couldn't disagree more with this statement. "Much better"? Really?!?!?!
Posted by gjackx
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2007
16587 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:35 am to
quote:

SP were better musicians however.

It's really just Kurt/Dave vs. Billy/Jimmy...everyone else was just there to play live and make the sound fuller. It's also hard to compare these two sets of people because of how Dave Grohl's career turned out.
Posted by TFTC
Chicago, Il
Member since May 2010
23689 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:36 am to
I loved Gish and a handful of songs off of Siamese Dream (Mayonnaise) and then they were over...
This post was edited on 7/19/12 at 10:31 am
Posted by gjackx
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2007
16587 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:37 am to
quote:

I loved Gish and a handful of songs off of Siamese Dream Mayonnaise) and then they were over...

Hardly...
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9748 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Kurt was a much better songwriter than corgan.

SP were better musicians however.


Disagree with both statements. I would say that Billy is a better songwriter and that Nirvana had slightly better musicians.

Billy vs. Kurt Songwriting: Both wrote some great catchy songs, but Billy seperates himself since he could write songs like Tonight, Tonight, 1979, Zero and Cherub Rock. Each song is totally different. Billy also wrote some great epic songs that are eight minutes plus. A lot of Nirvana songs start to sound the same.

Billy vs. Kurt Guitar Playing: I think this is a wash.

Dave Groel vs. Jimmy Chamberlain: I think this is a wash too.

Kris Novolselic vs. D'Arcy: Big time edge to Kris. D'Arcy was mostly there for image and was not a very good bassist.
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35652 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Kurt was a much better songwriter than corgan.
disagree. bc holds an advantage, albeit slight, imo

disarm is better than anything kc could ever hope to write, imho
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88052 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:48 am to
Hell, just the stuff BC did for Hole was better than Kurt.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:57 am to
quote:

I loved Gish and a handful of songs off of Siamese Dream Mayonnaise) and then they were over...

Take away loving Gish and this is how I felt. Pumpkins were a decent band with a meglomaniacal frontman with an exaggerated sense of his own talent. Pumpkins also wouldn't have sounded too far removed from the mainstream in the 80s -- they were nowhere near the game changer Nirvana was.

And Mellon Collie is one the biggest piles of dreck ever put to plastic. It's what Yes would sound like if they sucked and were somehow more pretentious.

Comparing Nirvana to Vanilla Ice doesn't even make sense. Ice was wannabe who latched on to a popular movement and made it palatable for suburban white kids. Say what you will about Cobain, but he was at the forefront of postpunk and his band wasn't exactly designed for crossover success. It was accidental, as Nirvana was a pretty rough sounding band -- even more so in the mix on In Utero (intentionally).
Posted by gjackx
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2007
16587 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 9:58 am to
quote:

And Mellon Collie is one the biggest piles of dreck ever put to plastic. It's what Yes would sound like if they sucked and were somehow more pretentious.

You are in the minority with the entire world on this statement.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88052 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 10:02 am to
quote:

And Mellon Collie is one the biggest piles of dreck ever put to plastic. It's what Yes would sound like if they sucked and were somehow more pretentious.
4.5 stars. Tonight Tonight. Zero. Bullet...1979.

You are a crazy person, and your focus on the people instead of the music is holding you back.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9748 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Pumpkins also wouldn't have sounded too far removed from the mainstream in the 80s


I agree with this as Billy has often said he never tried to shy away from his heavy metal and new wave roots. He is a big fan of Led Zeppelin, Queen, Yes, Joy Division, Depeche Mode and Cheap Trick, which all come through in his music.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 10:14 am to
I'm not focusing on the people. I'm trying to explain what it is about the sound I don't like. Billy Corgan is not all that talented, and even positive reviews of Mellon Collie focus on how self-indulgent the album is. It's remarkably pretentious and indulgent, two things I don't like in music. It's musical masturbation. Maybe Billy's a real nice guy, I don't know him. This isn't "who I'd like to have a beer with" because I doubt I'd want to hang out with the bipolar suicidal dude either.

Pumpkins albums sound like a guy trying out all of these neat ideas, and not committing to any one of them.

I don't like Rush either, and by all accounts they are the nicest dudes in the world. I still think their albums are musical wankfests in which they try and show off their musicianship instead of craft a decent song. It is also an album that sounds like a paeon to their own egos. Yet I think I would like to have a beer with Geddy Lee.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9748 posts
Posted on 7/19/12 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm not focusing on the people. I'm trying to explain what it is about the sound I don't like. Billy Corgan is not all that talented, and even positive reviews of Mellon Collie focus on how self-indulgent the album is. It's remarkably pretentious and indulgent, two things I don't like in music. It's musical masturbation. Maybe Billy's a real nice guy, I don't know him. This isn't "who I'd like to have a beer with" because I doubt I'd want to hang out with the bipolar suicidal dude either.

Pumpkins albums sound like a guy trying out all of these neat ideas, and not committing to any one of them.

I don't like Rush either, and by all accounts they are the nicest dudes in the world. I still think their albums are musical wankfests in which they try and show off their musicianship instead of craft a decent song. It is also an album that sounds like a paeon to their own egos. Yet I think I would like to have a beer with Geddy Lee.


I actually agree with most of this and is why I like the Smashing Pumpkins. I like the fact they are willing to try new things and make it bigger than ever. I will disagree and say that Billy is very talented.
This post was edited on 7/19/12 at 10:29 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram