- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are the SW prequels fair game for criticism, but TFA somehow sacred?
Posted on 12/21/15 at 1:51 pm to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 12/21/15 at 1:51 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
more like, when 59 years you reach (after spending good chunks of your 20's snorting half of Columbia with Belushi and screwing everyone on set), look as good you will not
Hell of a life though
Posted on 12/21/15 at 1:56 pm to blueboy
quote:
Because it's injected into everything now.
Is it though? You're getting fired up about something they might do in a future movie (spoiler alert, they won't).
But it's kinda getting like a McCarthy hunting down communists feel to it.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 1:58 pm to fr33manator
quote:
New leaders would have arisen and you'd think that they'd have more sense than to say "you know those giant arse laser moons with inexplicable weak points that keep getting blown up and wiping out vast swaths of our forces?
Let's build a bigger, dumber one. That eats Suns."
So new leaders arise, yet they are STILL USING THE SAME TECH as their predecessors. Given the amount of time it would take to engineer a planet, I'm pretty sure this was well into construction when the new regime took hold. Every single piece of tech has a weak point or a keystone. If you don't think so, name one thing that doesn't.
I'm sorry that you did not enjoy the movie. There will be two others coming and some stand alones. You may need to find something else to do. Basket weaving perhaps.
quote:
Poorly cast and written and acted for the most part. Definite money grab, just like the prequels, and Disneyfied.
So the real meat of the issue comes out. You are butthurt that Disney made a Star Wars movie. Well, if Disney made it it must suck as they are only in it for the money,just like the rest of the world. Sounds like you had some serious preconceived notions going in.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 2:17 pm to convertedtiger
quote:
Every single piece of tech has a weak point or a keystone.
Especially when one of your leaders starts Chopping up control panels whenever he doesn't get his way.
Maybe, just maybe, after they blow up 2 of your INSANELY expensive doomsday moons, you say "you know, we've had this happen twice. How about this time we have a group of engineers find out the weak point, and then design a few redundant systems to prevent them from destroying it the same way once again."
quote:
So the real meat of the issue comes out. You are butthurt that Disney made a Star Wars movie.
What!? I have no qualms with Disney. My kids enjoy many of their movies. As do I.
But this came across as goofy and forcibly diversified and controlled by studio execs and bean counters behind the scenes. With actors and writers and directors that had their hands tied a lot of the time.
"Make one of the Stormtrooper generals Silver! And a woman! We'll sell a ton of toys and costumes."
Posted on 12/21/15 at 2:56 pm to fr33manator
quote:Same here. This is the only website I've been on where Star Wars discussions are taking place. I created my thread criticizing it immediately after I got home from seeing it.
I didn't read a single review before hand. Good or bad. I went to the movie with no pre-conceived notions and full of hope.
And accusing the haters of being groupthinkers is pretty ironic. It's actually the other side that appears to have the "you are required to agree with me" angle.
quote:Again, the size comparison graphic was a laugh out loud moment for me.
New leaders would have arisen and you'd think that they'd have more sense than to say "you know those giant arse laser moons with inexplicable weak points that keep getting blown up and wiping out vast swaths of our forces?
Let's build a bigger, dumber one. That eats Suns."
And by the way, if the Deathier Star eats suns, why the frick do they need to blow up planets with the energy they consume? No sun. Planet dies all by itself. That's how it works.
It's really kind of depressing that this was the best writing they could come up with for such a huge project, or "property," as it is obviously considered.
BTW, Disney's stock is dipping today. Even Wall Street knows it sucks.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:00 pm to LucasP
quote:That was just one aside. In the grand scheme of badness, it's not really a relevant detail.
Is it though? You're getting fired up about something they might do in a future movie (spoiler alert, they won't).
quote:Ignoring the fact that McCarthy was vindicated by the facts, it's actually the other way around. The communists are hunting down the dissenters now.
But it's kinda getting like a McCarthy hunting down communists feel to it.
Shoulda named it "SJWars: The Force is Triggered."
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:06 pm to fr33manator
Like I said, an engineering project of that size was most likely well on it's way in construction before the New Order took control. It was the MarkIII as it were. One base that could destroy entire systems. The shield stopped everything sublight. It was thought to be impossible to come in at FTL so it was not thought of. Otherwise, the planet was pretty damn armored.
At the end of the day, this was the hook movie. The set up or reboot of a franchise for another group of fans with enough of the old to feel familiar to the old. In that, it accomplished its goals masterfully.
At the end of the day, this was the hook movie. The set up or reboot of a franchise for another group of fans with enough of the old to feel familiar to the old. In that, it accomplished its goals masterfully.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:08 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
If anyone critical about TFA was honest, they would be as critical about the OT. And if you're critical of the OT, you realize how mediocre, or even bad, they were as films. Fact
That is not a fact at all. Star Wars is not Citizen Kane or Throne of Blood for sure it is a Sci Fi Movie (just for you
Of course it has flaws if we are going to nitpick. Yes the dialogue is pretty bland and mostly just advances the plot but that is pretty standard especially in a standard SciFi/Fantasy/Adventure genre. The acting will not be studied at the Strassberg school, but it doesn't ruin the movie by any means. There are some gaffs and "plot holes" but nothing that i would consider major. But movies are supposed to be fun. By 1977 the "new Hollywood" gritty realism was entrenched at the movies and it was overall a pretty shitty decade for America in general. Star Wars was a break to more escapism, that is part of why it was such a cultural phenom. A flawed movie, sure, bad film, no sorry.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:12 pm to blueboy
quote:
Ignoring the fact that McCarthy was vindicated by the facts
Now you're just fricking with me right? The guy who accused Thoreau of being communist was validated?
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:22 pm to blueboy
quote:
BTW, Disney's stock is dipping today. Even Wall Street knows it sucks.
Now, I know you are an idiot, Disney stock dipping has absolutely NOTHING to do with Star Wars. As a matter of fact Disney buying Star Wars property for "only" 4 billion is pretty much being proven one of the best decisions they have made in a while.
However, I am laughing at the two of you talking about going in with no preconceived notions. That is utter BS as your analysis is constantly harking on how the movie was "this" and not "that". Buddy, if you can say those things immediately upon leaving a theatre, then you've got plenty of preconceived notions floating around in your head.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:22 pm to blueboy
I'm kind of somewhere in the middle of the two camps in this thread.
On one hand, there was a lot I liked about the movie. I liked Daisy Ridley for one. I thought she did a good job as Rey. I cared about her character, and I think she is a good protagonist.
I also liked Adam Driver as Kylo Ren, who is a flawed bad guy. He's insecure, he has a bad temper. He's overconfident. His "villain's journey" will parallel Rey's "hero's journey." He looks odd. Yeah, I'll concede that. But why does everyone have to look perfect? Wouldn't his odd looks play to his insecurity?
I liked Poe Dameron in concept. I wanted more time spent on him.
Han and Chewie were great. No complaints.
I also LOVED the spaceship scenes/dogfight scenes. That first chase scene with the Falcon and the two TIE fighters... amazing. Loved it.
Here's what I didn't like:
Another Death Star? Come on man. At some point, you figure out a tactic/weapon doesn't work and you give up on it. TWO Death Stars was stretching it.
R2D2 suddenly waking up and saying, oh yeah... here's where you can find Luke... thanks, dick.
Finn - okay... I'm just going to say it... while I find the stormtrooper-turned-good-guy angle interesting, it feels like they are trying too hard to insert a black guy into the movie and possibly make him Rey's love interest. Please, Hollywood, just fricking stop already. There are two types of people in this world: the ones who are irritated by the colorblind/interracial/gender doesn't matter/girls can do anything boys can do side; and the ones who PRETEND not to notice it. There are extremists on either side. I am not an extremist. I think there's plenty of room for black characters in the Star Wars universe, but I know when something is being shoved at audiences. I've been around a while. This is one of those times.
Overall, I think this is a really good Star Wars movie. I think it's the third best one. I'm eager to see what happens next and that's what really matters.
If you're offended about my feelings regarding Finn, I can't do anything about that. I'm just sharing what I think. Again, I'm all for diversity in casting. I just don't like Hollywood pushing false sincerity regarding diversity.
On one hand, there was a lot I liked about the movie. I liked Daisy Ridley for one. I thought she did a good job as Rey. I cared about her character, and I think she is a good protagonist.
I also liked Adam Driver as Kylo Ren, who is a flawed bad guy. He's insecure, he has a bad temper. He's overconfident. His "villain's journey" will parallel Rey's "hero's journey." He looks odd. Yeah, I'll concede that. But why does everyone have to look perfect? Wouldn't his odd looks play to his insecurity?
I liked Poe Dameron in concept. I wanted more time spent on him.
Han and Chewie were great. No complaints.
I also LOVED the spaceship scenes/dogfight scenes. That first chase scene with the Falcon and the two TIE fighters... amazing. Loved it.
Here's what I didn't like:
Another Death Star? Come on man. At some point, you figure out a tactic/weapon doesn't work and you give up on it. TWO Death Stars was stretching it.
R2D2 suddenly waking up and saying, oh yeah... here's where you can find Luke... thanks, dick.
Finn - okay... I'm just going to say it... while I find the stormtrooper-turned-good-guy angle interesting, it feels like they are trying too hard to insert a black guy into the movie and possibly make him Rey's love interest. Please, Hollywood, just fricking stop already. There are two types of people in this world: the ones who are irritated by the colorblind/interracial/gender doesn't matter/girls can do anything boys can do side; and the ones who PRETEND not to notice it. There are extremists on either side. I am not an extremist. I think there's plenty of room for black characters in the Star Wars universe, but I know when something is being shoved at audiences. I've been around a while. This is one of those times.
Overall, I think this is a really good Star Wars movie. I think it's the third best one. I'm eager to see what happens next and that's what really matters.
If you're offended about my feelings regarding Finn, I can't do anything about that. I'm just sharing what I think. Again, I'm all for diversity in casting. I just don't like Hollywood pushing false sincerity regarding diversity.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:22 pm to LucasP
quote:Absolutely. Apparently, communists don't like being called communists.
Now you're just fricking with me right? The guy who accused Thoreau of being communist was validated?
I don't usually direct people to the weirdos on the poli board, but go ask them if you don't believe me.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:26 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:I didn't get that feeling at all.
it feels like they are trying too hard to insert a black guy into the movie
Can you expand on that thought?
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:27 pm to blueboy
quote:
nd by the way, if the Deathier Star eats suns, why the frick do they need to blow up planets with the energy they consume? No sun. Planet dies all by itself. That's how it works.
Now you are just being a troll to be a troll. If you don't get that they were killing PEOPLE and governments while killing planets, then you need to put your helmet back on. DERP
Killing the sun would take quite a while to kill the planet no? Maybe long enough for all the people and the government to get off said planet? Good grief. More proof that you are a troll. Or just a moron, it could go either way.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:28 pm to LucasP
quote:
Now you're just fricking with me right? The guy who accused Thoreau of being communist was validated?
depends on what you mean by validated i suppose. I think his methods can be fairly questioned but a lot of the people he accused of being communists did, in fact turn out to be communists.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:32 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:
SpqrTiger
See, this is a well thought out critique. I can get behind this. I may not agree completely with it but I respect the angle. Well done.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:38 pm to SoGaFan
quote:Yuh huh.
Disney stock dipping has absolutely NOTHING to do with Star Wars.
quote:Why would it take a while for me to analyze a movie I've just seen? I started my thread when the movie was still fresh in my mind, and I didn't just say "it sucked." I laid out all of my problems with it in detail. People don't have to agree with me, but saying that I'm trolling is just incorrect.
However, I am laughing at the two of you talking about going in with no preconceived notions. That is utter BS as your analysis is constantly harking on how the movie was "this" and not "that". Buddy, if you can say those things immediately upon leaving a theatre, then you've got plenty of preconceived notions floating around in your head.
And I think it's pretty telling that all of the smartest people on this board didn't care for the movie. I mean, almost to a man.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:40 pm to SpqrTiger
Excellent points. If this had been the prequels or Lucas people would have been lambasting all these things, but suddenly it's Disney and JJ and they're supposed to be ignored?
Posted on 12/21/15 at 3:40 pm to blueboy
eta: nm
Forgot this was a nega-thread. Carry on.
Forgot this was a nega-thread. Carry on.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 3:42 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




