re: The official Interstellar thread (spoilers)

quote:

---

It's a challenge for him to explore and find Brand.

---

It's not a challenge. It's an impossibility that everyone gets but you.

quote:

---

Yea, I'm not for a sequel at all. But I think that's what we're suppose to get from the ending. The idea that he'll be exploring.

---

No, it's te idea he's going to Brand, and that's it. He knows exactly where he's heading, and that's through the wormhole and to Brand.

quote:

---

No, it's te idea he's going to Brand, and that's it. He knows exactly where he's heading, and that's through the wormhole and to Brand.

---

Keep telling yourself that and not answering my questions.

quote:

---

So if the wormhole is still open, why would Cooper need to steal a spaceship? Why not just go on one of the ships going to Brand's planet? It takes away from Cooper's challenge at the end of the film. It makes no sense that he would have to steal a ship. That's the whole point of the end of the movie. It's a challenge for him to explore and find Brand. Otherwise, all he has to do is hitch a ride on one of the spaceships on the way to Brand's planet.

At the end of the movie Murph says about Brand "she's alone, settling in for the long nap". She says she's alone more than once. If there were people helping her set up shop, why would she say she's alone?

---

quote:

---

Why do you ignore the Saturn thing?

---

What Saturn thing?

quote:

---

What questions?

---

The ones in the post you responded to. You seem mad, man. I'm sorry the movie is not what you want it to be.

quote:

---

You keep referring to some person

---

You mean the person who wrote the movie we're referring to?

quote:

---

I've explained it.

---

Where? Quote it.

Nowhere in this thread is the answers to these questions. That's why I asked them. These things just don't fit if the wormhole is open.

Ok, who says the humans are actually going there to truly settle? They've solved human extinction already and are spread out. Sure they may eventually go there, but they may just send small missions to plant crops there and whatnot, and that's it, and they're taking their sweet time getting there knowing Brand will be cryogenically frozen for decades. Plus, what if they've sent out missions to the other 9 planets to see if they can be settled on? There are variables here that would make sure they're not in a rush to get there.

quote:

---

At the end of the movie Murph says about Brand "she's alone, settling in for the long nap". She says she's alone more than once. If there were people helping her set up shop, why would she say she's alone?

---

I just really think you missed the point of this movie. I've explained to you about 10 times that Brand just sent the signal, but you ignore it.

quote:

---

I just really think you missed the point of this movie. I've explained to you about 10 times that Brand just sent the signal, but you ignore it.

---

They didn't say that Brand sent a signal. Why would you assume that? They never said that. As far as missing the point of the movie, how did I? Cooper has his work cut out for him to find a wormhole. He has a connection to Brand and love will find a way, but everything says that the portal is closed.

Not possible in today's social media. Leave it be. A movie that can stir up this much debate needs to be left alone.

I do think that he will eventually come out and say one way or the other regarding the wormhole. He did as much for Inception when people were debating whether or not

Spoilers for Inception.........













he was actually dreaming at the end. He made it clear that if his wedding ring was off, he's awake.

I always assumed he came out and said something. I think I heard on the radio that he clarified things. I haven't found anything about it yet, but I did find something he said that was interesting. It should make things a little more understandable for Interstellar actually.

quote:

---

Nolan adds that he tries to leave his movies open to interpretation. “There can’t be anything in the film that tells you one way or another because then the ambiguity at the end of the film would just be a mistake,” he says. “It would represent a failure of the film to communicate something. But it’s not a mistake. I put that cut there at the end, imposing an ambiguity from outside the film. That always felt the right ending to me."

---

LINK

Which basically means that you can have either interpretation. I bet he doesn't even know the ending to his movies.

Y'all are still arguing in here about the ending?