- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The official Interstellar thread (spoilers)
Posted on 11/11/14 at 7:54 am to LEASTBAY
Posted on 11/11/14 at 7:54 am to LEASTBAY
quote:
I read somewhere that the sound issues (music louder than dialogue) is actually some new form of technique that producers are using.
I will say that I did miss some dialogue because of this issue. The way I see it is if the sound is set perfectly it all works well. But what are the chances that every theater has the sound set perfectly?
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 7:55 am
Posted on 11/11/14 at 7:59 am to rebeloke
I saw the movie yesterday. The screen was big enough; so, I won't complain about not seeing it on an IMAX screen.
It was an entertaining but stupid movie. I know that sounds like blasphemy, given the extreme praise heaped on it in this thread.
If the premise is that "THEY" put a wormhole out there as a target for the salvation of human life on Earth, then "THEY" are/were extremely powerful and intelligent beings. We are teased with the possibility that "THEY" are really "US" in the future. Either way, I submit that "THEY" or "WE" had the ability to do the following:
1. Reveal the answer to whatever equation that Michael Caine was working on. Heck, they could have simply told "US" what needed to be done;
2. I see no reason why such communications had to be vague, in binary language, or positioned in a "luck of the draw" location for discovery. For that matter, I don't understand why Cooper was constrained to be behind a bookcase the entire time. Couldn't he have found another location in Murph's life to provide the signals;
3. I see no reason why the saving communications could not have been delivered at a stage on Earth when conditions had not gotten so dire. "THEY" or "WE" would have known what was coming; there was no reason to subject "US" to all of that misery;
4. I don't understand why "THEY" or "WE" provided 12 possible locations for "US" to habitat. Dang, just point out the right ONE planet and help us get there. Not to mention, do I understand that each of the 12 explorers were on solo missions? Imagine the one who came down on the planet covered with water. Does she seek a dry place and, not finding any, abort? Or, was she, like the others, simply a dart thrown in the direction of that planet without ability to navigate out of danger. Why did Cooper's craft have the ability to get away from there but hers did not? If her craft was a dart, imagine an alien with such a meteoric craft splashing down on Earth in the middle of an active volcano, instead of a safe place. Well, that's the luck of the draw, I guess;
I don't understand why, when entering the black hole, Cooper's craft exhorted him to "EJECT". What was going to happen to the craft? Why would Cooper be SAFER outside the craft? That is, if the black hole was destroying the craft, then it surely should have destroyed the puny human who departed it. If we are left with the impression that Cooper actually "died" while entering the black hole but, like Lazarus, he came back to life, why did the black hole let him escape?
For that matter, why did it seem to collapse in on him; I'm not sure what was being portrayed as the place near Saturn at the end of the movie which rescues Cooper. I submit that if it is what I think it was, then it would have taken a heck of lot longer time to construct than would Murph have had left in her life; it would have involved availability of resources not shown to us in the rest of the movie. I guess the solution to the equation must have also provided a resurgence of resources;
What happened to plan B? Did Brandt jettison that plan after she landed with Freeman?
These are thoughts that have rattled in my head since yesterday. There are many others that could be shared. For example, I would think that Cooper and his family would be living a much better lifestyle than that shown in the movie if he were truly one of the last successful food suppliers on the planet.
It was an entertaining but stupid movie. I know that sounds like blasphemy, given the extreme praise heaped on it in this thread.
If the premise is that "THEY" put a wormhole out there as a target for the salvation of human life on Earth, then "THEY" are/were extremely powerful and intelligent beings. We are teased with the possibility that "THEY" are really "US" in the future. Either way, I submit that "THEY" or "WE" had the ability to do the following:
1. Reveal the answer to whatever equation that Michael Caine was working on. Heck, they could have simply told "US" what needed to be done;
2. I see no reason why such communications had to be vague, in binary language, or positioned in a "luck of the draw" location for discovery. For that matter, I don't understand why Cooper was constrained to be behind a bookcase the entire time. Couldn't he have found another location in Murph's life to provide the signals;
3. I see no reason why the saving communications could not have been delivered at a stage on Earth when conditions had not gotten so dire. "THEY" or "WE" would have known what was coming; there was no reason to subject "US" to all of that misery;
4. I don't understand why "THEY" or "WE" provided 12 possible locations for "US" to habitat. Dang, just point out the right ONE planet and help us get there. Not to mention, do I understand that each of the 12 explorers were on solo missions? Imagine the one who came down on the planet covered with water. Does she seek a dry place and, not finding any, abort? Or, was she, like the others, simply a dart thrown in the direction of that planet without ability to navigate out of danger. Why did Cooper's craft have the ability to get away from there but hers did not? If her craft was a dart, imagine an alien with such a meteoric craft splashing down on Earth in the middle of an active volcano, instead of a safe place. Well, that's the luck of the draw, I guess;
I don't understand why, when entering the black hole, Cooper's craft exhorted him to "EJECT". What was going to happen to the craft? Why would Cooper be SAFER outside the craft? That is, if the black hole was destroying the craft, then it surely should have destroyed the puny human who departed it. If we are left with the impression that Cooper actually "died" while entering the black hole but, like Lazarus, he came back to life, why did the black hole let him escape?
For that matter, why did it seem to collapse in on him; I'm not sure what was being portrayed as the place near Saturn at the end of the movie which rescues Cooper. I submit that if it is what I think it was, then it would have taken a heck of lot longer time to construct than would Murph have had left in her life; it would have involved availability of resources not shown to us in the rest of the movie. I guess the solution to the equation must have also provided a resurgence of resources;
What happened to plan B? Did Brandt jettison that plan after she landed with Freeman?
These are thoughts that have rattled in my head since yesterday. There are many others that could be shared. For example, I would think that Cooper and his family would be living a much better lifestyle than that shown in the movie if he were truly one of the last successful food suppliers on the planet.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 8:03 am
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:10 am to We Will Win Again
Prepare thyself for the onslaught.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:23 am to LEASTBAY
quote:My wife was actually covering her hears at several points. There went my only chance to find out what was said
I read somewhere that the sound issues (music louder than dialogue) is actually some new form of technique that producers are using.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:36 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Prepare thyself for the onslaught.
He actually brings up some good points.
But, like all questions about movies like this, you have to stop trying to rewrite it and point out holes and just enjoy it for what it is, and what it is, is very good.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:40 am to We Will Win Again
quote:
2. I see no reason why such communications had to be vague, in binary language, or positioned in a "luck of the draw" location for discovery. For that matter, I don't understand why Cooper was constrained to be behind a bookcase the entire time. Couldn't he have found another location in Murph's life to provide the signals;
Because that is when she was the most perceptive to it. It was the only time she'd be able to make something of it.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:54 am to We Will Win Again
You have some very elementary, close to idiotic questions.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 12:05 pm to We Will Win Again
quote:
What happened to plan B? Did Brandt jettison that plan after she landed with Freeman?
She carried out the plan. She has no idea of what happened back in our Solar System.
quote:
I submit that if it is what I think it was, then it would have taken a heck of lot longer time to construct than would Murph have had left in her life; it would have involved availability of resources not shown to us in the rest of the movie. I guess the solution to the equation must have also provided a resurgence of resources;
They said early in the movie that the facility they were working in WAS the floating facility shown later in the movie. Also based on Murphs age it was ~80-90 years from when she solved the equation.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 12:47 pm to 13SaintTiger
The paradox may be solved if we consider the theory of parallel universes, which I think Kip Thorne may believe. Not sure. Let's say there are an infinite amount of universes, and you want to travel to the past. It's possible that instead of influencing or changing your own universe's future, you're actually changing an identical or near identical universe's. It's the same theory used in Michael Chrichton's Timeline.
So for example, in one universe (A) old Dr. Brand and NASA could've devised a plan to start a colony somewhere, maybe on a space station, that somehow thrived and evolved over millions of years. They may have found a planet eventually. Anyway, for some reason, maybe love?, these advanced beings create the wormhole. Maybe they wanted to save more Earth natives or something. Whatever the reason, this wormhole pops up in a near identical universe (B) in the 50's (I think that's when old Brand says). Then the movie begins. Whatever happens in the movie takes place in universe B, I think.
It doesn't solve all of Interstellar's questions, but it helps with the paradox.
It can also go hand in hand with the idea that anything is always happening, and whatever can happen, will happen. Who knows, maybe we are destined for space, but if we don't try or if we take actions to prevent it, we doom ourselves.
Just spit-balling some ideas. I wouldn't mind collaborating ideas in attempt to solving or explaining this movie. I enjoyed it a lot. I rank it higher than Inception.
So for example, in one universe (A) old Dr. Brand and NASA could've devised a plan to start a colony somewhere, maybe on a space station, that somehow thrived and evolved over millions of years. They may have found a planet eventually. Anyway, for some reason, maybe love?, these advanced beings create the wormhole. Maybe they wanted to save more Earth natives or something. Whatever the reason, this wormhole pops up in a near identical universe (B) in the 50's (I think that's when old Brand says). Then the movie begins. Whatever happens in the movie takes place in universe B, I think.
It doesn't solve all of Interstellar's questions, but it helps with the paradox.
It can also go hand in hand with the idea that anything is always happening, and whatever can happen, will happen. Who knows, maybe we are destined for space, but if we don't try or if we take actions to prevent it, we doom ourselves.
Just spit-balling some ideas. I wouldn't mind collaborating ideas in attempt to solving or explaining this movie. I enjoyed it a lot. I rank it higher than Inception.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 12:57 pm to arktiger28
An excerpt from The Science of Interstellar detailing the Blight and the general condition of Earth...
- Population of North America alone was reduced to a tenth of its current size via a combination of catastrophes
- Agrarian society but not necessarily a dystopia
- Most aspire to little more than just survival
- Kip was dubious of the setting, so he conversed with four Caltech biologists to flesh out how plausible the scenario is. Some thoughts/possibilities:
-- Small scale example of ecological catastrophe: no snow on Sierra Nevada for a few years (perhaps due to global warming) would destroy drinking water supply for Los Angeles. Ten million people migrate, agricultural output from CA plummets
-- Human immune system simply cannot keep up with rapidly evolving pathogens for a contagious virus (ex: ice caps melting release a dormant pathogen that we haven't experienced yet and it wipes out plants and/or humans before our immune systems can fully adapt)
-- As an attempt to halt global warming, we fertilize the oceans to produce algae that eats much of Earth's carbon dioxide, but an unintended side effect is new kind of algae that produces toxins that poison oceans. Aquatic plant and fish life is killed off, increasing reliance on agriculture (ex: early in Earth's history, cyanobacteria started making oxygen and radically changed composition of Earth; killed almost everything else on Earth. Oxygen was like a lethal byproduct)
-- Blight is any disease in plants caused by pathogens; there are generalist and specialist blights, for targeting many species of plants or just certain ones
-- Pathogen that attacks chloroplasts, something that all plants have in common. Chloroplasts are crucial to photosynthesis; pathogen could start in the ocean, wipe out life there, then move to land
- Population of North America alone was reduced to a tenth of its current size via a combination of catastrophes
- Agrarian society but not necessarily a dystopia
- Most aspire to little more than just survival
- Kip was dubious of the setting, so he conversed with four Caltech biologists to flesh out how plausible the scenario is. Some thoughts/possibilities:
-- Small scale example of ecological catastrophe: no snow on Sierra Nevada for a few years (perhaps due to global warming) would destroy drinking water supply for Los Angeles. Ten million people migrate, agricultural output from CA plummets
-- Human immune system simply cannot keep up with rapidly evolving pathogens for a contagious virus (ex: ice caps melting release a dormant pathogen that we haven't experienced yet and it wipes out plants and/or humans before our immune systems can fully adapt)
-- As an attempt to halt global warming, we fertilize the oceans to produce algae that eats much of Earth's carbon dioxide, but an unintended side effect is new kind of algae that produces toxins that poison oceans. Aquatic plant and fish life is killed off, increasing reliance on agriculture (ex: early in Earth's history, cyanobacteria started making oxygen and radically changed composition of Earth; killed almost everything else on Earth. Oxygen was like a lethal byproduct)
-- Blight is any disease in plants caused by pathogens; there are generalist and specialist blights, for targeting many species of plants or just certain ones
-- Pathogen that attacks chloroplasts, something that all plants have in common. Chloroplasts are crucial to photosynthesis; pathogen could start in the ocean, wipe out life there, then move to land
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:01 pm to ChipDouglas2403
quote:
but it helps with the paradox.
There isn't an ontological paradox if you consider what TARS told Cooper while they were in the tesseract.
"Time is being represented here as a physical dimension."
"They didn't bring us here to change the past."
There isn't a timeline, and there isn't a casual chain of temporal events. Time functions as a spatial, physical dimension in which all points in time occur concurrently.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 1:51 pm to Cs
Someone else's thoughts on a similar theory of multiple timelines:
Yes, to 5D beings, time isn't linear. But to us, there's a paradox. It all started with the wormhole. They/we put a wormhole there for a reason. Why, if not to change something in the past or accelerate our evolution?
quote:
The first timeline is one where humans barely survive on earth (maybe underground?) but then evolve and these are our 5D beings. They decide that things would have been easier had almost everyone not died, so they place the wormhole near Saturn so that Cooper will go there and explore the black hole and be able to communicate the required information for the gravity theory back to earth
Yes, to 5D beings, time isn't linear. But to us, there's a paradox. It all started with the wormhole. They/we put a wormhole there for a reason. Why, if not to change something in the past or accelerate our evolution?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:08 pm to Cs
quote:
I think the beings were indiscriminately creating anomalies around the earth to alert whoever might understand that something is going on and further their drive to look into it. The reason they weren't able to get in touch with Murphy specifically is because they didn't know her on a personal level to send her a meaningful and purposeful message.
So they/we didn't send Coop n TARS there to change the past, we sent them to help Murph change it?
quote:
Oddly enough the ultimate solution to everything with Cooper sending the message to Murph validated Brand's emotional pleas about the potential significance of love, just not in a mystical way. Because of Cooper's connection to Murph, he was essentially an autonomous entity perfect for turning loose in the universe and seeking Murph out once he was in 5D space. In terms of setting up a time loop that would work, such a powerful connection between two people would dramatically increase the odds of a successful plan. Cooper would move hell and high water to contact his daughter.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 2:18 pm to arktiger28
quote:It absolutely was, IMO. The fact that the future of mankind hung in the balance in that one maneuver. It was a similar high point that Nolan created in Inception when JGL was fighting as the van was flipping. The main thing that made both of those scenes great though, was the score. Zimmer nailed that shite.
I still can't get over the docking scene. I don't think I have ever been that tensed up in a movie. Love this movie or hate it you have to say that scene was perfection.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:04 pm to We Will Win Again
quote:
I see no reason why the saving communications could not have been delivered at a stage on Earth when conditions had not gotten so dire. "THEY" or "WE" would have known what was coming; there was no reason to subject "US" to all of that misery;
Maybe for "US" to evolve into "THEM", that misery had to happen. What if they just saved us from the beginning, an alternate "THEM" might not have existed?
Maybe everything that can happen, will. I don't think it is by accident Murphy's Law was referenced multiple times.
quote:
What happened to plan B? Did Brandt jettison that plan after she landed with Freeman?
I thought it was pretty clear when she landed, the guy she was meeting there was already dead... There was a makeshift memorial and she had a camp setup.
Depending how big the station was (well multiple stations, since they reference Murph being transported from one to the other- which took 2 years. ), maybe they used Plan B to help bolster future humanity?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:06 pm to ChipDouglas2403
quote:
Yes, to 5D beings, time isn't linear. But to us, there's a paradox. It all started with the wormhole. They/we put a wormhole there for a reason. Why, if not to change something in the past or accelerate our evolution?
perhaps they weren't changing anything. Maybe that is what it took for humanity to reach that evolutionary stage- an almost catastrophic ending for the human race. I assume we learned that killing each other in wars pretty much sucked, etc. Growing pains.
Sure, they could say "hey bro, quit killin each other.." but how well has that worked out? Perhaps at that particular point in human history is when intervention was required.
Sometimes you gotta let a kid touch the hot fire and burn himself for him to know that hey.. that shite fricking hurts.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:18 pm to Ancient Rome
I think what's being missed here is the "love" reference. "THEM" or "WE" used the emotion of love, as well as other things, to communicate with the past. They used the connection MM had with his daughter to communicate. Why was it in that time? I think he made it clear that they weren't sure exactly in what time frame to communicate the message. The technology they used is so beyond our understanding, making judgments on why they did what they did and when they did it is impossible and irrelevant. We don't know what their capabilities were.
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:31 pm to abellsujr
So 5th dimension.
This doesn't necessarily mean time travel right? It means that time is simply just another coordinate in addition to the XYZ planes we operate on right?
Does this include alternate realities where maybe another decision would have lead to a completely different "time line" (even though in this context, there is no line).
This doesn't necessarily mean time travel right? It means that time is simply just another coordinate in addition to the XYZ planes we operate on right?
Does this include alternate realities where maybe another decision would have lead to a completely different "time line" (even though in this context, there is no line).
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:33 pm to Ancient Rome
Well it kind of means time travel. In the 5th dimension time isnt linear. Everything that has ever happened or will happen is happening simultaneously. But its not like they can hop in a delorean and head to the old west.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 3:50 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
But its not like they can hop in a delorean and head to the old west.
Watches? Where we're going we don't need watches.
Popular
Back to top


1








