- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Superman' Megathread: Spoilers Allowed! DC News. Releases on Digital on August 15.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:25 pm to Proximo
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:25 pm to Proximo
quote:
#4 being so controversial
MOS was crazy on this board. It was always surprising how controversial it was. I didn't suspect that walking out of the theater. I really enjoyed it. I thought a lot of others would too.
0
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:27 pm to BlacknGold
I’m glad reception has been good
Gonna take my grandson to this one
A good Superman movie makes me happy, and it’s double fun with so many negative assholes out there melting because they were hoping for failure
Gonna take my grandson to this one
A good Superman movie makes me happy, and it’s double fun with so many negative assholes out there melting because they were hoping for failure
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:34 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:You can say "Snyder Stans"
it’s double fun with so many negative assholes out there melting because they were hoping for failure
they know who they are
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:54 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Yep, called it!
Why has the audience meter been garbage because they dropped “want to see”? That doesn’t even affect audience score
Secondly, what’s garbage about verifying the person leaving the review actually saw the movie?
You know, like you haven’t done but keep shitting all over the thread anyway
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:06 pm to Proximo
Ask RT why they changed their system. Ask them why ’want to see’ was done away with.
It was done because fans were not falling in line with gleefully praising Captain Marvel.
* Receipts, from 6 YEARS ago!
It was done because fans were not falling in line with gleefully praising Captain Marvel.
* Receipts, from 6 YEARS ago!
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:20 pm to DesScorp
quote:
Betraying my age here, but thats a fairly recent take on Luthor. He began as your prototypical “mad scientist who wants to rule the world” archetype, straight out of 30’s pulp sci-fi magazines that comics writers from the 50’s to the ‘80’s grew up reading. There was no Lexcorp, no political runs. Luthor had a scheme of the month… a new deathray, a new mutant animal, a new kryptonite trap. He paid for his exotic gear by stealing. He was a straight up villain. Hell, he had his own costume.In many ways, that was a better kind of villain than the jealous captain of industry that John Byre re-imagined. I miss that old mad scientist Luthor.
I don't think that Lex Luthor is completely gone from comics these days, but I also think giving him more understandable motivations has been a net positive for the character overall.
To be sure, nobody used to try to give comic book villains anything close to a real motivation beyond "get more power/gold/women/whatever."
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:23 pm to Roaad
quote:
You can say "Snyder Stans"
they know who they are
His Justice League cut was much better than the one released in theaters, but the Snyderverse movies were not good overall and his take on Superman was awful. He had a great Superman actor and still somehow managed to screw it up.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:35 pm to imjustafatkid
I like MOS, a lot.
There should have been a stand alone Batfleck.
Wonder Woman before B v S would have been better
They rushed Batman v. Superman. Was originally supposed to be 2 movies but they panicked after MOS
There should have been a stand alone Batfleck.
Wonder Woman before B v S would have been better
They rushed Batman v. Superman. Was originally supposed to be 2 movies but they panicked after MOS
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:53 pm to udtiger
quote:
I like MOS, a lot.
It wasn't a bad movie, it just wasn't a good Superman movie. Superman would not carelessly endanger civilians. Full stop.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:59 pm to imjustafatkid
actors, cinematography were very good and MOS had a great score. Paw Kent tornado was ridiculous, collateral damage was bad and killing Zod was stupid. I did like the movie overall though.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:02 pm to Madking
quote:
actors, cinematography were very good and MOS had a great score. Paw Kent tornado was ridiculous, collateral damage was bad and killing Zod was stupid. I did like the movie overall though.
Yep I agree with all of this. The problem was how they ruined Superman as a character.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:04 pm to udtiger
Still love BvS. Don’t care what the Disney flacks say.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:05 pm to imjustafatkid
I’m not a Snyder fan fanboy but I think the BS WB pulled when his daughter committed suicide was egregious and if he’d have been left in charge we probably get a much better DCU.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:09 pm to SoFla Tideroller
BvS was far too bloated and it tried to do way too much for one movie. The DCEU didn't have to copy the MCU but a better roll out could have been implemented. They tried to catch up to Marvel in one film but introducing Batman, Wonder Woman, teasing Flash, Cyborg, and the Justice League. Doing a Batman vs Superman storyline, introducing Lex and doing Doomsday. All that could have been done in multiple phases over multiple movies instead just one movie
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:10 pm to dawgfan24348
100%
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:11 pm to dawgfan24348
Agreed. Didn't say it was perfect. Still enjoyed it a lot.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:15 pm to Madking
quote:
I’m not a Snyder fan fanboy but I think the BS WB pulled when his daughter committed suicide was egregious and if he’d have been left in charge we probably get a much better DCU.
I'm not so sure. Doing a Justice League movie before introducing even half of the Justice League in their own films was a bad decision.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:19 pm to imjustafatkid
Justice league is when the change was made. They started filming in April of 2016, she died nearly a year later and the movie was released about 8/9 months after that. That’s a Joss Whedon movie who sabotaged it on purpose and caused all kinds of problems on set. He did all the rewrites, reshoots, editing and post production.
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:25 pm to Madking
I get that, but Snyder still did make the decision to do that movie when it was done. I'm not sure anything could have salvaged it. I was super into it, but I'm a DC comic books need. General audiences want to see a slower build up to the team.
Snyder's version of the Justice League movie is a much better version, no doubt.
Snyder's version of the Justice League movie is a much better version, no doubt.
This post was edited on 7/9/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 7/9/25 at 8:40 pm to imjustafatkid
Well imo rushing to catch up with Marvel was the mistake that led to all the problems.
Page 20 of 72
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News