- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Red Letter Media reviews "Jack and Jill" and destroys Adam Sandler's career
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:24 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
All of his movies revolve around gimmicky characters. And I enjoy most of them. I just find it amusing people think he used to make amazing movies and this one falls way short. Maybe if he threw in a "he called the shite poop" line people wouldn't be so upset.
Well you obviously didn't watch the video, because if you still feel that way after that massive assraping of Adam Sandler's career, then you are an idiot. They uncovered Adam Sandler as the con man he really is. I thought this was merely a shitty film before this review, but there is alot of things that are ridiculously sinister about it and Adam Sandler's career. All Adam Sandler cares about is inflating the film's budget as much as possible so that he and his goons receive as high of paycheck as possible. Trying to make a good film is the very last thing on Adam Sandler's mind.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:28 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
those people have way to much time on there hands. I enjoyed the star wars reviews but that one was about as painful as seeing Jack and Jill
It's not like these two guys do this on the side. This is their literal careers and they produce a good product.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:30 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
Does a movie like Grandma's Boy count as a Sandler movie even though he wasn't technically starring in it?
Since it entirely features Sandler's goons and henproduced it, absolutely. I enjoyed Grandma's Boy, but it's cut from the same cloth.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:36 pm to OMLandshark
Does the money making crappy movie scenario they described remind anyone else of that episode of 30 Rock where Jack purposely made a horrible movie starring Jenna that was still ridiculously profitable even though it would bomb in the box office?
I know 30 Rock is sometimes sly with their humor but maybe that episode was even more clever than I originally thought.
I know 30 Rock is sometimes sly with their humor but maybe that episode was even more clever than I originally thought.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:42 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
All Adam Sandler cares about is inflating the film's budget as much as possible so that he and his goons receive as high of paycheck as possible. Trying to make a good film is the very last thing on Adam Sandler's mind.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Adam Sandler is probably going to see this review. This is the type of analysis, like his Plinkett reviews, that greatly spreads. I've actually thought that Adam Sandler was all in all a good guy who just lost his comedic sensabilities. Now I see him as nothing more than a con man. Its simply ridiculous how spot on they got on this review, as always.
all Hollywood has to do is say no.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:50 pm to OMLandshark
Sounds like they're criticizing half the "comedy" movies today, and especially The Hangover. But the hoi polloi of this board rave over that movie and its siblings. Sandler is the father of such movies, and I find it so entertaining that the same people who love the children of Sandler's seed criticize Sandler here. When I have made such criticism, I have been chided and mocked.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:51 pm to St Augustine
quote:
all Hollywood has to do is say no.
Kinda hard for them to since Adam Sandler's films make alot of money and he tends to find alot of financing for the films through product placement. Granted I think the American public is finally catching up to Sandler since none of his films have remotely met expectations this year. Maybe the time is
coming when Hollywood tries to make Adam Sandler
stop his shite when less and less people go and see his films.
Also this review made me lose alot of respect for David Letterman as well.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 5:55 pm to TulaneLSU
They distinguish in the review that films like the Hangover have little to do with Sandler's films and formula. Sandler's films are fart humor and guys getting kicked in the crotch or falling down. I think I can give even the Hangover 2 a higher grade than that in comedy. Hangover and Apatow films actually have jokes and don't rely on physical injury or racism to make their jokes work. Aside from Funny People, I don't think that Sandler has remotely affected any of their works.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 6:03 pm to OMLandshark
Watch Hangover again. The gay Chinese character only is "funny" because it hits on stereotypes of gay people and Asian people. His entire character and all the humor that stems from him is racist. One could say the same for Mike Tyson, but let's use him as the celeb cameo. Or we could say the same for Mel Gibson, but he was removed from the movie due to the protests of the fat bearded guy who makes poo-poo, "RE-TAHD" jokes. Let's not forget how Hangover is a giant infomercial for the Las Vegas tourism board and its specific casinos. Let's remember the poor, poor tiger and monkey who were injured and abused in the Hangover, lest we forget. Men who dress as women? Oh, The Hangover would NEEEEVER do that! LOL.
Every criticism they levy against Adam Sandler can be applied to The Hangover and its ilk, like Horrible Bosses.
Every criticism they levy against Adam Sandler can be applied to The Hangover and its ilk, like Horrible Bosses.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 6:45 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
The gay Chinese character only is "funny" because it hits on stereotypes of gay people and Asian people.
Still, Mr Chow doesn't descend to the bottom feeding that some of Sandler's stereotypes do. Yeah he's effinite and has a small dick like Asians do, but they don't ever make him crossdress or abduct and eat a dog while performing an equation on how best took cook it. That's what Sandler would have done with Chow's character, and he may getthe actor to do that. If I remember correctly, the actor was in the zookeeper to where they may have had him do that. Granted I hate Mr Chow, but from the Sandler films I've seen, only Roland Emmerich can compare in the stereotyping.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 6:52 pm to OMLandshark
All of Sandler's movies have been worthless. People are finally starting to get it.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 6:56 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
One could say the same for Mike Tyson, but let's use him as the celeb cameo. Or we could say the same for Mel Gibson, but he was removed from the movie due to the protests of the fat bearded guy who makes poo-poo, "RE-TAHD" jokes
At least Tyson adds to the plot (of the first one at least).
quote:
Let's not forget how Hangover is a giant infomercial for the Las Vegas tourism board and its specific casinos
It doesn't mention Ceasar's Palace in every other scene in the film and has little to no importance to the plot. All it is used for is a quick one liner, which I'm sure every person who is currently working for the casino make them want to hang themselves.
quote:
Let's remember the poor, poor tiger and monkey who were injured and abused in the Hangover, lest we forget
They added to the plot, and the Tiger was hardly degraded.
quote:
Men who dress as women?
They're in Thailand. It's their version of quick instant weddings from Vegas.
quote:
and its ilk, like Horrible Bosses
Oh really? Name one? I don't recall much product placement (only thig I can recall is a Wii), it actually had jokes that were set up over a long period of time, and while it does have a cameo by Bob Newhart, the cameo is great and hilarious, unlike Sandler's cameos dealing with sports people, his failed SNL alumni, and celebrities which add absolutely nothing to the plot. Plus Horrible Bosses and all other good recent comedies tend to be much more vulger Sandler's comedies.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 7:02 pm to OMLandshark
Dude, The Hangover is not any better than Sandler's disposable trash.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 7:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
When Red Letter Media makes a video telling him that then he'll agree.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 7:07 pm to Jamohn
quote:
Does the money making crappy movie scenario they described remind anyone else of that episode of 30 Rock where Jack purposely made a horrible movie starring Jenna that was still ridiculously profitable even though it would bomb in the box office?
I know 30 Rock is sometimes sly with their humor but maybe that episode was even more clever than I originally thought.
This is the plot of the 1968 movie The Producers. There was a remake of it a few years ago as well.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 7:28 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The Hangover is not any better than Sandler's disposable trash
I at least laughed quite a bit at the Hangover, and I hated the second, but at least I didn't feel insulted by it. I agree that the first one is ok and the second sucks, but just from the previews I'd put it against any Adam Sandler film from the past 5 years (aside from Funny People).
Posted on 11/21/11 at 7:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Dude, The Hangover is not any better than Sandler's disposable trash.
Im no hangover fan, but this is plain wrong. Jack and Jill is in no way comparable to the hangover.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:00 pm to Baloo
quote:
And I'll defend 50 First Dates, which was actually a sought-after script before Sandler got it.
I really think 50 First Dates is the creepiest film ever made. It's made all the more creepy by the fact that it thinks it is charming. If it were some type of horror film, then it would probably be pretty great.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 8:04 pm to OMLandshark
Sorry, can't sit through five minutes of Adam Sandler critique much less FIFTY.
This cries out for a highlights reel or something.
Popular
Back to top


3



