Started By
Message

re: New Netflix docu-series "Making a Murderer" (Spoilers)

Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by gatortrav88
Member since Oct 2014
3807 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:31 pm to
They could at least admit a lot of the people involved in the trial are scumbags

Kratz, the cops, dumbass judge etc
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:55 pm to
Mike Halbach is such a fricking scumbag.
Posted by CrimsonFever
Gump Hard or Go Home
Member since Jul 2012
18099 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 4:10 pm to
Would a member of her family have known the Avery property enough, or had enough access to it (garage ect.) to be able to pull this off?

How would they know which burn pit to put her bones in or where to dispose of her car on the property ect?

I guess it is possible that someone else, the brother maybe, killed her somewhere else and the cops found her body and vehicle, then did the rest of the work as far as framing Avery. Seems implausible to me. I think if he was set up then a cop either had to have killed him or a cop got someone else to do it.

I do think Steve Avery should've been acquitted. .
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 6:48 pm to
Manitowoc County Sheriff Robert Hermann

quote:

“Unfortunately, I think the film has done a lot of damage and is definitely not the way Manitowoc County would like to be put on the map.”


You mean how Kratz held that news conference after the Dassey "confession".

quote:

Among the missing evidence Hermann cited:

-Avery’s sweat DNA found on the hood latch of Halbach’s vehicle discovered by Calumet County law enforcement.
-Handcuffs and leg shackles were found in Avery’s bedroom.
-Halbach’s cell phone and camera were found burnt in a burn barrel.
-Her DNA was found on a bullet from Avery's gun.


I'm fairly certain all of this was covered in the show.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

I'm fairly certain all of this was covered in the show.

It actually wasn't.

Actually there were also a lot of things that were not mentioned in the doc that make Avery look bad. Not all necessarily direct evidence to this murder, but he was a sick, fricked up dude.

Do some research about it if you haven't. If you have and still feel like the doc wasn't biased, I would be shocked. But that's your opinion.

Honestly I've hashed this thing to death with many people (most not on this board) and I'm tired of it. Most of the people who I know that saw this felt VERY different about the whole thing after they found out some of the stuff about Steve Avery that was kept out of the doc.

Obviously there were some issues within the sheriff's department. It's hard to dispute that, IMO. There were people closely involved that should NEVER have been anywhere near this case. I believe some evidence was planted. I also believe Steve Avery is guilty as sin.

Ultimately people will believe what they want, just make sure your research is not limited to this doc.

Personally, I'm very happy Avery is locked up.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Most of the people who I know that saw this felt VERY different about the whole thing after they found out some of the stuff about Steve Avery that was kept out of the doc.
I've yet to see anything left out that was anything more than either conjecture, hearsay, or irrelevant to the issue of murder.

It's a good tactic by the opposing side though. Note something that was left out, regardless of its relevance or veracity and people will question the bias of the documentary. I mean one of the missing pieces of evidence is that he possessed porn. Yet, it's presented as a troubling omission, even though watching or possessing porn is actually normal behavior.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 10:59 pm
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:01 pm to
That's cool. Like I said, I'm not here to argue. I believe that there are things out there that relate to him being a sexual predator. There's enough information out there for me to believe that. The important thing is that the dude is locked up, IMO. Whether or not we agree about what was and what was not planted can go back and forth till the end of time. You may always believe he didn't kill that girl. I will always believe he did. Like I said, the important thing for me is that he's locked up.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:05 pm
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
37180 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:03 pm to
How could these two dimwits scrub the trailer and garage of all blood and DNA evidence?

Have you seen Steve Avery? The dude doesn't even wear underwear. He's a goddamn mess.

What a travesty.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38660 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Honestly I've hashed this thing to death with many people (most not on this board) and I'm tired of it. Most of the people who I know that saw this felt VERY different about the whole thing after they found out some of the stuff about Steve Avery that was kept out of the doc.


No one has any idea of whether or not Avery is guilty or not. Thinking that we can form a cogent opinion from a documentary and/or from "left out evidence," is a misguided notion and the entire problem. For the jurors and those involved, all of this is tainted and THAT'S part of the point.

quote:

Personally, I'm very happy Avery is locked up.



While on a basic level, maybe. However, the ends shouldn't justify the means. Right now, regardless of whether or not he did it, according to our laws, Avery , form the case that was presented even with the "extra evidence, should be a free man. That sucks, but I'd rather a system that is trusted to work than one that gets it right based on tampering, conflicts of interest, etc. That's a bad precedent.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 7:47 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 7:58 am to
quote:

the reporter with the dark hair and glasses that wasnt convinced was smoking

On 7 now. Indeed she is. Loved that they showed a lot of her.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83976 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 8:02 am to
Actually, after extensive reading on the case, seeing the doc, and reading about the other evidence. . .

I am pretty confident of 3 things:

1. That town is "whoa"
2. Those cops and Prosecutor are scum
3. Steve Avery killed the frick out of Teresa Halbach

There is no way to arrive at absolute certainty without having witnessed the act, but I am very confident in those 3.
Posted by STLhog
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2015
19470 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 8:45 am to
I just change my mind over and over.

For being borderline retarded, he's a pretty damn good liar. He's pretty convincing in his interviews while she is missing and when he gets detained.

The thing with the bones can be explained that members of the family/ex boyfriend had freaking access to the search. 7 days is plenty of time to move bones from the initial burn spot and plant them on the Avery property.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38660 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Actually, after extensive reading on the case, seeing the doc, and reading about the other evidence. . .

I am pretty confident of 3 things:

1. That town is "whoa"
2. Those cops and Prosecutor are scum
3. Steve Avery killed the frick out of Teresa Halbach

There is no way to arrive at absolute certainty without having witnessed the act, but I am very confident in those 3.


I'm still not convinced enough of #3 to be "absolutely certain," however I think it's the most likely story.

Is it just me, or did nearly EVERYONE involved in this thing look like a liar? Coulborn and Jenk oozed lying on the stand. Bobby and Scott's stories were WAY off from Brendan's the bus driver's, and everyone else's but corroborated each other conveniently. The FBI "analyst," etc. The only person who probably told a truth at some point was Brendan, and he probably didn't really understand what that truth was. And I don't know which story of his is actually true.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15108 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Not sure why more people aren't talking about this. If this is true and they left if out of the documentary, it paints the doc producers in a pretty bad light. This makes it seem that they were manufacturing evidence because they really did know that he was guilty.


It's pretty easy for filmmakers to present the evidence in such a way that supports their opinion. They're obviously pro Avery and it's very surprising that more people here are taking everything at face value and believe him to be innocent.
Posted by STLhog
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2015
19470 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 9:37 am to
quote:

t's very surprising that more people here are taking everything at face value and believe him to be innocent.




Umm not its not.

As an American we are supposed to presume innocence until guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt.

All of those assuming he's guilty are basically communist/fascists.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38660 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Actually, after extensive reading on the case, seeing the doc, and reading about the other evidence. . .

I am pretty confident of 3 things:


Actually, I dug in a little more and found a couple of good collections of stuff. Let's not call them indisputable facts, but given the Internet, even Slashfilm can collect links together.

LINK

Just some highlights:

quote:

According to documents obtained by TMZ, Steven Avery claims that both of his brothers have a history of sexually assaulting women and that his brother Charles has a history of aggression toward women who visited the family’s salvage yard, and that Charles would pursue women to their homes and seek intimate contact to the extent that they would fear for their safety. Apparently one woman even went to the police claiming that Charles sent her inappropriate gifts, called her over and over again, and showed up at her doorstep. Most interesting, all of the women were allegedly harassed by Charles within a month of the time Teresa Halbach went missing. According to Steven, Charles had the motive to frame him, which includes jealousy over his (at the time possible) multi-million dollar reparation settlement, and its very possible Charles did not want him to take over the family business. Of course, Steven was unable to point fingers during the trial, and Steven’s theories were not presented in the television series.


LINK

Which links to another site on page 2: LINK

quote:

“The German”: A man who visited a property near the Avery compound on the day and supposedly had “scratches on his back and a cut finger that bled intermittently.”His wife reported that she found “bloody women’s panties, fresh bones, a can of lighter fluid with bloody fingerprints, a mason’s hammer covered in dark red flecks, graphic pornographic magazines, and surgical gloves” to the Manitowoc County Sheriff’s Department.
Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey’s family members, most notably Bobby Dassey, who had fresh scratches on his back days after the murder, and his father, Scott Tadych, who corroborated one another’s alibis and were vocally anti-Steve throughout the entire case.
Officer Colburn and Lieutenant Lenk are the subject of many fan theories for the obvious reasons presented in the series.
Ryan Hillegas: Teresa’s ex-boyfriend who is shown leading a search party, being questioned as a witness in Steven’s trial, and speaking to the media, is the subject of a lot of theories.
Teresa’s possible suicide: Some people believe that Teresa Halbach may have taken her own life, led by the cryptic video messages about “If I were to die” and her status as “Missing Endangered”.
An Unknown Stalker: It was briefly mentioned by one of Teresa’s colleagues that she was intentionally avoiding calls and saying things like “Not him again.” Some people think the man could be Avery or the ex-boyfriend, but what is it was an unknown stalker who exploited the Sheriff’s Department’s dislike for Avery by framing him and leaving evidence to be planted by Officer Colburn?
Steven Avery: Many people still believe he may have been the murderer, but even those people think that because of the lack of evidence and obvious bias that influenced the case, he should not have been convicted due to “reasonable doubt.”



quote:

In a now-deleted Reddit post, a user references a blog post from 2009 written by a man named Brian McCorkle, which describes a woman living right outside the Avery family's property at the time of the murders. Estranged from her erratic, sometimes violent, fire-obsessed husband, whose last name was "German," the woman discovered that he'd visited her home (near the Avery compound) on the day of Teresa Halbach's murder, Oct. 31, 2005. "He [German] visited the Maribel area and had stopped at the rental before the lease began. He spoke of visiting an auto salvage yard. He commented that a woman wanted to take pictures of the rental property . . . and he felt that the photographer was 'stupid.'" After this incident, the woman discovered that "her husband had scratches on his back and a cut finger that bled intermittently." Later, upon seeing a missing persons flyer showing Teresa Halbach, German remarked "she's dead." Following other suspicious incidents, the woman called the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department, who arrested and charged her husband with disorderly conduct and resisting an officer. In November 2005, the same woman discovered a number of suspicious items in German's home: bloody women's panties, fresh bones, a can of lighter fluid with bloody fingerprints, a mason's hammer covered in dark red flecks, graphic pornographic magazines, and surgical gloves. After reporting these things to the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department during another of her husband's frightening episodes (for which he was arrested), the police rebuffed her by claiming that Teresa's clothing had already been accounted for and that the panties likely belonged to a child. However, the woman continued to believe that her husband was involved with Halbach's disappearance after moving cross-country to get away from him — and Teresa's clothes, supposedly accounted for by the police, were never presented as court evidence. While the details and source of this story are iffy, many online commenters consider "the German" a viable suspect for Teresa Halbach's murder — especially because this account of the incidents was written so long ago. It's intriguing at the very least!


This is a lot of theory stuff, conjecture, etc. so grains of salt needed. However, if you want to review ALL of the stuff out there, and reported stories (can anyone really confirm this "The German" thing?) you have to review it all. Don't stop with just the "unreleased" evidence as remember, the courts did bar Strang and Buting from proposing anything other than Dassey or Police Misconduct. They could not offer any evidence related to suggesting an alternative suspect.

And this is a reddit list, with links of defense evidence not shown in the doc and/or not allowed in court:

LINK

Like those leg cuffs found at Avery's:

quote:

On the leg irons/handcuffs from Avery's house. They tested those for DNA and found a mixture of DNA from 2 or more people. They confirmed Avery to be a source of one of the matches. Most importantly, they excluded Teresa's DNA as a match.


That's from the Dassey court transcript. So the people reporting about left out evidence, are in fact, leaving other stuff out.
This post was edited on 1/11/16 at 10:15 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

It actually wasn't.


3/4 definitely were.

quote:

Do some research about it if you haven't. If you have and still feel like the doc wasn't biased, I would be shocked. But that's your opinion.


Of course it was somewhat biased, but much less so than Kratz pulled at that press conference.

quote:

Most of the people who I know that saw this felt VERY different about the whole thing after they found out some of the stuff about Steve Avery that was kept out of the doc.


I have yet to see anything that I trust come out that wasn't already covered extensively.

quote:

Ultimately people will believe what they want, just make sure your research is not limited to this doc.


This "new" information has been hashed out numerous times already over 38 or so pages. Welcome to the thread.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 10:22 am to
quote:

They're obviously pro Avery and it's very surprising that more people here are taking everything at face value and believe him to be innocent.


Yet you have no issues taking the information "not included" at face value, even when it's provided by the same corrupt people that pulled this shite in the first place?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39854 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

leg cuffs


I believe those have also been alleged to be of the Spencer's Gifts variety - i.e. with an easy release button which the "captive" can reach.

Isn't it also pretty telling that the Dassey transcript was actually not part of the Avery trial?
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38660 posts
Posted on 1/11/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Isn't it also pretty telling that the Dassey transcript was actually not part of the Avery trial?



Yup.
Jump to page
Page First 36 37 38 39 40 ... 84
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 38 of 84Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram