Started By
Message

re: Movies that should have had a sequel but box office killed it

Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:56 am to
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11141 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 12:56 am to
National Treasure had a sequel but was hoping to see a third installment.
Posted by mattchewbocca
houma, la
Member since Jun 2008
6519 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:09 am to
League of extraordinary gentlemen
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
5111 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 8:28 am to
Pandorum

* sequals were planned. Part 2 would have taken place prior to events in part 1. Part 3 would have taken place after the ship landed on Tanis.
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24105 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 8:37 am to
John Carter is the obvious answer.

The critics purposely destroyed a very good movie - focusing more on its costs than the film itself. It kept people away.

When I finally saw it at a later date I was floored by how good it was.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8088 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 2:19 pm to
quote:


John Carter is the obvious answer.


loved the books when I was around 12-13-14

I don't know if that age group is too sophisticated by bells and whistles for it to work now. They were just really good books.

and I was waiting to see if Deja Thoris was going to be "incomparable" like she was described in the books and she was (Lynn Collins)
Posted by Neutral Underground
Member since Mar 2024
2712 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 3:34 pm to
I love John Carter. I have watched it at least 15 times.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
86982 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 4:04 pm to
My Cousin Vinny
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56854 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:40 pm to
Battlefield Earth
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
33021 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 7:44 pm to
Dredd
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
22841 posts
Posted on 11/17/24 at 8:37 pm to
quote:


John Carter is the obvious answer.

The critics purposely destroyed a very good movie - focusing more on its costs than the film itself. It kept people away.
I blame a couple of Disney's Board of Directors or whatever they're called.

Understand: Disney wanted a big scifi franchise to ride, something they could bank on turning profits. Half the board wanted to build it in-house, and John Carter/Barsoom was the effort. It was slated to take over where Pirates of the Caribbean was, and maybe make even more money.
The other half wanted to go outside and buy an established franchise.

Go look it up: only a few months after JC flopped, Disney bought Lucasfilm for 4 billion. That's a huge amount of money to come up with in a short period of time, so it was clearly under consideration for awhile. But I don't think the full board would sign off on that if JC had hit it big, so it was in someone's best interests that JC failed.

The fricking shame of it all, Star Wars has failed too... for reasons John Carter would not have. There's over a dozen books in that series, so you have plenty of material to keep making movies. JC's stars were young so you wouldn't have to deal with transitioning to new characters for awhile, and then the books actually do a handoff to John and Dejah's son. You could have groomed a franchise, and as long as production values stay up, the more movies they made the more familiar (and profitable) each sequel would be.
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
2868 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 4:00 pm to
Man from UNCLE with Henry Cavill
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50469 posts
Posted on 11/20/24 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Mile 22


I'll second this
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram