- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning, Part Two has been delayed until at least 2025
Posted on 10/24/23 at 6:58 am
Posted on 10/24/23 at 6:58 am
LINK
I guess with at least a 2 year gap for the "conclusion" movie, you have to change the title
Tom Cruise's last few movies have been a complete shitshow when it comes to releasing.
quote:
Tom Cruise‘s next Mission: Impossible movie is departing the 2024 box office calendar. The eighth installment in the action spy franchise appears to be dropping the second half of its previous title, Dead Reckoning, Part Two, with a new title expected to be announced at a later date.
I guess with at least a 2 year gap for the "conclusion" movie, you have to change the title
quote:
Paramount and Skydance have pushed back the film back to May 23, 2025, off its previous date of June 28, 2024. The feature shut down production to allow for star Cruise and the cast to promote Dead Reckoning, Part 1. Then the SAG-AFTRA strike hit in mid-July, which meant the cast could not return to work on the film, which hails from director Christopher McQuarrie.
Tom Cruise's last few movies have been a complete shitshow when it comes to releasing.
7
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:00 am to GetCocky11
COVID
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:18 am to GetCocky11
Unions are a disease
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:19 am to GetCocky11
Cruise gotta build up his lung capacity for the subzero world record breath holding he’s gonna have to do to get to the submarine that sunk in DR: part 1
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:26 am to GetCocky11
I think the title change has more to do with the first one being a box office disappointment. Don't want to remind people it's a sequel to a dud of a movie.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:41 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Don't want to remind people it's a sequel to a dud of a movie
Movie was only a dud because it release the week before Oppenheimer and Barbie…
Posted on 10/24/23 at 8:02 am to GeauxHouston
I thought it was awesome. hayley atwell Was an absolute smoke show.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 11:32 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
I think the title change has more to do with the first one being a box office disappointment. Don't want to remind people it's a sequel to a dud of a movie.
It was really good, actually. Killing off Rebecca Ferguson’s character was a mistake. She was awesome. But, it was a good movie that got upstaged by Barbie and Oppenheimer mania.
Looking forward to the next one.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:19 pm to theunknownknight
Yup
They know Covid needs to come for 2024 election
They know Covid needs to come for 2024 election
Posted on 10/24/23 at 1:52 pm to GeauxHouston
quote:
Movie was only a dud because it release the week before Oppenheimer and Barbie…
Plus they lost out on GTX and IMAX screens.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 2:12 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
Killing off Rebecca Ferguson’s character was a mistake.
my wife has a thing for her (
) and is convinced she's not dead.Posted on 10/24/23 at 3:16 pm to 3nOut
quote:
convinced she's not dead.
She's not the only one that thinks this.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 3:25 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
It was really good, actually. Killing off Rebecca Ferguson’s character was a mistake. She was awesome.
SPOILER ALERT
Posted on 10/24/23 at 3:31 pm to 3nOut
quote:
my wife has a thing for her
What kind of thing?
Posted on 10/24/23 at 4:13 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
What kind of thing?
i mean i wish that sort of thing, but just thinks she's a beautiful lovely actress.
not my style if i'm going with Hollywood actresses i have a thing for (Atwell way more fits that mold) but i can't disagree with her.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 4:18 pm to GetCocky11
absolutely loved Dead Reckoning Part One.
Posted on 10/24/23 at 7:49 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
think the title change has more to do with the first one being a box office disappointment. Don't want to remind people it's a sequel to a dud of a movie.
Exactly. That's also why they ar delaying it. I guarantee it.
They're delaying so they make the public forget about the first one and remarketing the sequel as it's own independent 'Tom Cruise event' film.
Posted on 10/25/23 at 6:36 am to Jack Ruby
They're delaying so they make the public forget about the first one
—read the OP
—read the OP
Posted on 10/25/23 at 9:43 am to GetCocky11
Wiki says both parts were shot back to back and wrapped in 2021. Hard to believe reshoots could add a year.
Posted on 10/25/23 at 9:53 am to rebeloke
quote:
Movie was only a dud because it release the week before Oppenheimer and Barbie…
Plus they lost out on GTX and IMAX screens.
That was Paramount's own fault, they could have moved the dates. The head of IMAX productions...
quote:
“The dating of releases, especially on big movies, is a common problem. It's a pretty crowded summer. We wanted to play both movies as much as we could because Mission is going to be a great picture in IMAX, but they [the studio], dated the movie right behind Oppenheimer. We wanted to get them to move it, to create more time to play both in IMAX to the full extent that they both wanted, but it didn't work out. That's not our decision – that's the studios’.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News