Started By
Message

re: Matt Reeves' The Batman won't be part of DCEU; Ben Affleck will not star

Posted on 8/24/17 at 11:57 am to
Posted by smkspy
Da filthy nasty dirty South; BR, LA
Member since Jul 2013
915 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 11:57 am to
So this is the monthly Batman movie is going to shite thread. Meh, click bait sites are the worst.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Batman/Superman's biggest story came out in the 80's at the launch of the dystopian era of comics (Watchmen, Dark Knight Returns).

Cap's biggest stories took place in the modern era of comics, so they're a lot less dated.

Iron Man sort of stumbled storywise when they linked to his "big" stories (Demon in a Bottle in Iron Man II, Extremis in Iron Man III).


Sure...but that doesn't make DC/WB's decision to pull those two stores as inspiration for BvS any better. Those, eventually, could have been really GREAT stories. But before you get to The Death of Superman, you kind of have to show him liked enough to be mourned, right? And even though they tried to give Batman a reason to fight Superman, it wasn't nearly as good of one as The Dark Knight Returns. It just feels like a kid taking two action figures and smashing them together yelling, "FIGHT!! FIGHT!!"

Imagine how great a Death of Superman story line could have been as a third Superman story after a Justice League movie or two and you'd gotten to know and love the character for 5 or 6 movies? What about waiting until the end of your arc to give us the fight between Superman and Batman so that you know their history and there's a good reason for Batman to be older?

Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38443 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 12:10 pm to
Both companies have rushed into storylines that logically should come later in the hero's timeline. Some worked and some didn't.

Winter Soldier didn't have the same gravitas in the film as it did in the comics. We didn't have half a century of Cap shouldering the guilt of Bucky's death. Same thing with Civil War. Iron Man and cap just had a couple of missions together before they turned on each other.

The Dark Knight Returns and Death of Superman aspects of BvS could've worked. It was more the tone and script that brought the movie down than the basic plot. Snyder wasn't the first to have the idea of Superman and Batman starting off as adversaries. Byrne did it in Man of Steel and Timm did it in the animated series.
Posted by Ibleedblackandgold
Back in Louisiana where I belong
Member since Jun 2009
2858 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

You wanna know why no one takes your opinions on this topic seriously...? Despite the many MANY times this idiotic suggestion have been refuted, it still keeps being tossed out.

What's more likely is that those of us who have been less than pleased with what DC has trotted out are, in actuality, really big DC fans and are heartbroken they've fricked this up so badly.

I'm actually tired of repeating this...kind of feel like I need to type it all out, keep it somewhere as a Word doc and then just copy and paste the fricking this ever time this red herring it dropped on here as an excuse for why people don't like DC's movies.



All of this. And God forbid if you say Wonder Woman was a good movie and not a great one...the nerve.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Winter Soldier didn't have the same gravitas in the film as it did in the comics. We didn't have half a century of Cap shouldering the guilt of Bucky's death. Same thing with Civil War. Iron Man and cap just had a couple of missions together before they turned on each other.


Well, yeah...but they didn't exactly have 50 years to get there. Specifically with Tony and Steve, I always thought they set that up nicely from the get go with them not liking each other all that much. As far as what they did with the story in CW...not being about registration but atoning for all the damage, etc...I have lots of problems with that as I always thought it was a ridiculous charge given the alternative outcomes. That was my same basic gripe for why it was a stupid reason for a logical Batman to hate Superman when the alternate outcome would have been the extinction of the human race.

quote:

Timm did it in the animated series


Which animated series? Not JL...did that happen in one of the first two solo series that I've forgotten? By JL they were not buddies but they weren't about to throw down.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 12:58 pm to
The World's Finest.

Bruce tries to nail Lois.

Supes and Bats play cat and mouse.

Bruce plays Lex.

Joker plays Lex.

Mercy and Harley beat each other up.

Edit: It makes the secret identity scene in the Thannagar invasion pretty funny because Supes knows who everyone is too, Bats never calls him on it.
This post was edited on 8/24/17 at 1:01 pm
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38443 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Which animated series?


Superman: The Animated Series

Batman is carrying around a sliver of Kryptonite. Superman doesn't like Batman's methods (or that Bruce is after Lois), Batman throws Superman across the room and Superman smashes Batman and X-Ray visions him to see his Bruce identity.

Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 4:05 pm to
quote:


Superman: The Animated Series

Batman is carrying around a sliver of Kryptonite. Superman doesn't like Batman's methods (or that Bruce is after Lois), Batman throws Superman across the room and Superman smashes Batman and X-Ray visions him to see his Bruce identity.




Don't recall that...gonna look it up. Sounds kind of awesome, actually!
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38671 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

and you, Freauxzen, and Breesus are the first to believe anything that is posted, and just ignore and move along when it is proven to be false

I mean, godammit, this has been proven wrong and sighted multiple times already, yet this thread is still active and has not been updated - because I guess it doesn't match the messaging we want here on TigerDroppings?

ETA: That being said, RollTide is worst than all 3 of you.. but still, you 3 are extremely bad about believing EVERYTHING (and it's not just you 3, I just happen to run into you 3 on basically every board / thread I post in)



What are you talking about? I read the article and proceeded to say:

quote:

Whut?

No way


Which means, I don't believe it. I then proceeded to confirm that by saying in the other thread about this:

quote:

But yeah, there is no way this was ever true. DCEU make bad decision, but no one makes a decision that monumentally dumb.


I never believed this story man.

This post was edited on 8/24/17 at 4:18 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38671 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

The top 3 threads currently on the Movie/TV Board are people complaining about DC, this is pretty hilarious




The other 17 are about GoT.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/24/17 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Lol you were as giddy as they were after seeing MoS



Look here, motherfricker. I evolved and changed my views accordingly when evidence emerged that contradicted my views and made me reflect on it.

There's nothing more american and human than that.

Good try giving me shite for it though.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Look here, motherfricker. I evolved and changed my views accordingly when evidence emerged that contradicted my views and made me reflect on it.


I'm in the exact same boat in regards to Mos. I think that's an easy and logical position to defend, honestly.

For my take, I really liked the idea at first that the Kents would be super worried about the world finding out about Clark's abilities. Did it hurt hearing Pa Kent tell him those kids possibly had to die? Yep! Those kinds of things grounded the story and made it seem real. I loved the conversation he had when he showed him the ship and the kid asked if he was still his dad. I was ok with Pa Kent basically forcing Clark to allow him to die because he was so sure that it wasn't the right time to reveal his abilities and that he was willing to sacrifice his own life to save his son from that. I liked that people WERE afraid of Superman at first...it was a nice contrast between the Donner Superman that flies out of nowhere and saves Louis in Metropolis and no one is shocked and they start cheering. Heck...I liked Lois putting it together right away. I was even ok with the devastation in Metropolis AND killing Zod!

But all of that was contingent on this being Baby Superman, and we'd see him evolve into the REAL Superman we loved in the next movie. It was contingent on that being Step 1, not a complete changing of who the character is into this mopey, whiny, douche.

We didn't get that in BvS. In fact, Sydner doubled down and made him less likeable. He even had half the planet hate and fear him still. And dear, sweet Martha even told him to basically stop as he didn't owe the world anything. So...looking back, I was defending a movie that did not exist. Snyder was not making a Baby Superman movie...he was making HIS Superman movie, where he simply did not like Superman. So in retrospect, all those who saw that at first were right I think...and after seeing BvS I went back and re-watched MoS and realized how right they were, and I was mad I had defended it so much.

Had he not continued to do what he did with Superman in BvS, I think I'd still enjoy the vast majority of MoS.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram