Started By
Message

re: It's Okay to Like The Force Awakens

Posted on 11/30/17 at 1:57 pm to
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60083 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 1:57 pm to
I liked when I first saw it, but it bored me on rewatch.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40857 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Look at real life and consider the death star a nuclear bomb. Expensive and you only get one use but everyone wants one. Now think about scary leaders. Kim Jong and his kid - scary lunatics with giant armies. Give them a capable and active nuclear weapon and delivery system? fricking nightmare for this world. Imagine if Hitler had an active nuclear arsenal. It makes a terrifying villain a hell of alot more terrifying.


Again, while it makes sense to reuse a super weapon and compare to nukes, it is being used by the writers because it is easy to convey fear with that.


Let me give you a real world example. 9/11. Not a nuke.
That's what I'm getting at. Creative writing could have drummed up a plausible scenario that is very fearful without using the super weapon.

I'm not saying it doesn't work as a plot device, I'm saying it wasn't necessary. Which someone else said it was. While I liked the movie, I just don't buy how much they had to reuse for "familiarity" and to "introduce Star Wars to a new generation".
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 2:02 pm
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

think if he was making 9 movies and the enemy organization changes/time passes, I just doubt he would have put himself in that corner, saving if for later in the series


I don't know. Agree to disagree I suppose.

The Death star basically didn't exist in the prequels, is the main cause of concern in the OT, and is improved upon massively in TFA.

Look at my edit in the last post. Put it in terms of a nuclear bomb.

When you head north Korea has a nuke and is developing an ICBM delivery system, is your first thought "Meh, we've used nukes before" or is it "oh, shite that could be bad"
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

I'm not saying it doesn't work as a plot device, I'm saying it wasn't necessary. Which someone else said it was.



Yeah that I can agree with.

However 9/11 is so brutal because we cared about all the people in those buildings and they were real and they were American.

If in Star wars a sith guy flew a plane into Jedi HQ, it wouldn't be as effective. Because we aren't Jedi, and we don't care about a few faceless nonexistent bureaucratic characters in a fictional building.

In a movie, especially a crafted universe where people galaxy jump all the time, perhaps the most efficient way to build fear is to do it on a massive scale. Ramping up the scale conveys fear that is otherwise much harder to get across without some serious character development.
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 2:04 pm
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Yeah that I can agree with.


In fairness, there's not a whole lot of variety in super weapons that can travel at the speed of light and destroy entire planets with a single shot. I mean there are Death Stars and there are.........
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18694 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:


And it wasn't just one some Sith rando. It was one of the most powerful and most cunning guys alive. And his name was Jar Jar Binks and he's the true sith master throughout the entire prequel trilogy slowly poisening and manipulating everyone. It's real.


Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18694 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

so you go back to using the same scary weapon.


It did, and STILL brings shivers down my spine...

It might be reused, but holy cow if I didn't flinch at the scene...
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:28 pm to
For those who are not #woke to JarJar allow me to begin your journey down the rabbit hole that begins a whole new appreciation for the amazingness of the prequels:
more detailed and expanded discussion of JarJar's force usage and ability throughout the prequels

LINK

Seriously everyone should watch that video. At minimum the last 3 minutes of the second video, and then we can discuss the amazing and unbelievable wasted talent and God-tier level twist that would've been if JarJar was revealed as the anti-yoda like he should've been.

This amazing turn was even supposed to take place at the end of the second movie and leave you with a what in the holy frick I can't believe that just happened feeling as you walked doubt the theater for a new generation like Empire did for the last generation.

At the end of Clone Wars Yoda should've fought JarJar after a badass reveal, then everything else plays out the same. JarJar escapes while Yoda saves Obi-Wan and Anikan kills JarJar at the beginning of Revenge after he "kidnaps" Palpatine. Dooku was never supposed to exist.

This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 3:29 pm
Posted by oreeg
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
5431 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:36 pm to
I loved TFA.

The only things I didn't like about it were the Rathtar scene and I felt the 3rd act with the Starkiller base was a little forced and rushed.

Example: Han Solo reunites with the Resistance when they learn about the Starkiller base and its capabilities. Then they "break the huddle" with Han saying, "Well I guess we should blow it up."
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

The only things I didn't like about it were the Rathtar scene and I felt the 3rd act with the Starkiller base was a little forced and rushed.


This I agree with. That planning phase shouldve been more serious and better written and approached instead of hurrhurr there's always a way to blow it up hurrhurr let's just find an exhaust hatch. That was almost criminal campy fourth wall breaking for no reason and it takes me out the movie every time I watch it. It broke the tension in the film and really bothered me.
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 2:48 pm
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

This I agree with. That planning phase shouldve been more serious and better written and approached instead of hurrhurr there's always a way to blow it up hurrhurr let's just find an exhaust hatch. That was almost criminal campy fourth wall breaking for no reason and it takes me out the movie every time I watch it.


Or just skip the planning altogether and let the viewer just assume some planning went into the attack.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Or just skip the planning altogether and let the viewer just assume some planning went into the attack.




Agreed anything would've been better than ah hyuck hyuck plot device lulz dats not how da furce wirks
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45335 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:54 pm to
I like TFA and actually like Rouge One more than TFA.

I didn’t know shite about anything that happened before A New Hope so I enjoyed it. I own both of the new films and the only one I've watched more than once is Rouge One.

Scarif is probably the most memorable planet, at least to me, in the entire franchise. Place was beautiful.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44412 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

I didn't love it, but I liked it. I think it was a good set up for The Last Jedi. Hopefully, The Last Jedi improves upon TFA.



This.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40857 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Scarif is probably the most memorable planet, at least to me, in the entire franchise. Place was beautiful.


Funny enough while watching that I said to myself. "looks like the Maldives."

Ended up being the Maldives.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Agreed anything would've been better than ah hyuck hyuck plot device lulz dats not how da furce wirks


Also, was it just me or was Chirrut more annoying than Jar Jar Binks and the ewoks combined?
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15492 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

If we want to get picky about it, Rogue One was shitty because of the way they COMPLETELY changed the entire known premise of how the rebels got the plans to the death star in the first place


Is this about the Bothans again? Because that was for the other Death Star.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29822 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Hell I'm not even that sure the Rebels and jedis are the good guys.



That was the real point of rogue one.

Rebellions are not clean.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

was it just me or was Chirrut more annoying than Jar Jar Binks and the ewoks combined?



I'll have to disagree with you there.

Chirrut's storm trooper fight scene ( LINK) was one of my favorite scenes in the movie.

Proof that JarJar is a misunderstood genius and we were all robbed of something that may have redeemed the entire Prequel Trilogy and rivaled the "I am your father" moment.

ETA:moved to the new thread so as not to clutter this one.
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 3:49 pm
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29822 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 3:22 pm to
Agreed. He goes from a tree dwelling idiot to a senator.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram