Started By
Message

re: Has any show gotten so much better after a character left than better call saul

Posted on 3/21/24 at 5:04 pm to
Posted by OWLFAN86
The OT has made me richer
Member since Jun 2004
175719 posts
Posted on 3/21/24 at 5:04 pm to
but kinda central to the character development
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27294 posts
Posted on 3/21/24 at 10:22 pm to
Chuck was a POS. He is a ton to blame for Jimmy. I still don't give Saul a pass but Chuck was the worst brother ever.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
61601 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 6:09 am to
Doing a rewatch now. Just starting Season 3


Great show
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57265 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:14 am to
quote:

After chuck left?


The ending was kinda stupid
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150583 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Good Trivia nugget. Patrick Fabian, the actor who played Howard Hamlin, was also the college professor on Saved by the Bell - The College Years.

Come on, son...that's very common knowledge. I think we called Lasky in the BCS discussion threads.
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10579 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:29 am to
The character of Chuck and the performance of the actor were both fine and actually necessary to the plot. It was the misdirected focus and too much time spent by the writers on pointless law firm politics and bullshite that hurt. They should have let the Mike and cartel plot lines have more time at the expense of the law firm story line. Part of who Saul is was caused by his rejection by his brother and the hoity toity law firm; we get it. Best character on a flawed show was Lalo and the story line involving him and Nacho was where the show got back to the genius of Breaking Bad. Mike's back story was also awesome but hard to watch because of how old a "young" Jonathan Banks looked.
Posted by timbo
Red Stick, La.
Member since Dec 2011
7304 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Howard Hamlin really got a raw deal. Turns out, he was not quite the dick Jimmy thought he was.


Jimmy and Kim going to Howard's memorial service and crying crocodile tears in front of his widow - that was among the lowest things anyone on those shows did. It's up there with Walter watching Jane OD, Walter missing the birth of his daughter to make a drug deal, Jesse shooting Gale.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59013 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Howard Hamlin really got a raw deal. Turns out, he was not quite the dick Jimmy thought he was.



Howard was probably the best human being in the entire Breaking Bad/Better Caul Saul universe. He got the rawest of deals. But I don't think Jimmy thought he was a dick. He knew he was legit a happy and moral man, and I think that pissed Jimmy off because he knew, subconsciously, he could never be that. Jimmy may have thought his act was a put-on at 1st (and it was to an extent as Howard always put on that persona, even when the firm was tanking), and he thought that a lot of opportunities he gave him was only because of Chuck, but a lot of it wound up being genuine. So he resented Howard's "phoniness" at 1st, then probably resented it even more when it became more clear that he was a genuinely good man.

But he mainly resented him because Chuck respected him, but he never expected Jimmy. Jimmy admits just this to Howard's wife at his wake at HHM in the the final season, episode 9 (Point and Shoot). Howard had told his wife that Jimmy was playing some elaborate trick/harassing him (which he obviously was), and Jimmy and Kim were the last ones to see him alive and had told the cops that, so the wife cornered them about it at the wake.

They had to continue the lie they had created about his drug addiction, so Jimmy had to keep that up but couldn't let her think that Howard had gone completely nuts. ("Couldn't" because it would make the story less believable that Howard's wife wouldn't have been able to pick up on the signs, but also "couldn't" do that to Howard or his newly widowed wife out of some sense of, what I'd argue is guilt/moral regret.)

So in a rare moment of honesty (though self-serving), he downplays the huge prank/harrassment conspiracy, but says this "You know what? I didn't leave here under the best terms. The past few years I could have been more considerate to Howard instead of yitzing him every chance I got. I guess there was a certain amount of jealousy on my part because Howard had the respect of my brother. Which I never did." Which was honest, and a huge contributing factor into how/why Jimmy turned out the way he did and why Chuck was such an integral part of the show. I get that it wasn't as exciting as other parts of the show, but it was absolutely necessary.
Posted by DivotBreath
On the course
Member since Oct 2007
3502 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:52 am to
M*A*S*H* — got better when Frank Burns left and was replaced by Charles Emerson Winchester. While Frank had his moments, the whole “love sick puppy” routine with Hot Lips got old quick and always being the hapless fool ran its course quick. Charles proved to be a formidable opponent to the harassment dished out by Hawkeye and BJ. The show was more balanced with Charles.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59013 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 10:04 am to
That post was probably too long, but it hit on the Howard part and the OP. I actually watched the episode I alluded to and the one prior where Howard was shot last night. I was listening on old episode of the podcast "The Watch" and they were talking about those 2 episodes, so I decided to watch them again. I was actually gonna make a thread this morning myself on whether people thought Jimmy was just a "bad" guy. The podcasters thought so, though they did love the character. I think there's more ambiguity to it.

Jimmy did bad things, but they were relatively harmless at 1st until he "got in with the wrong crowd"--what Mike tells Nacho's father in the same episode--and as the stakes got higher and higher, so did his "bad" deeds until they eventually became unredeemable. But I think, at his core, he was probably "good," he was just a really insecure frickup full of self-loathing and could never figure out how to get out of his own way.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77952 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Jesse shooting Gale.
had to happen or both he and WW were dead.

Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59013 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Best character on a flawed show was Lalo


I don't concede the show was flawed, and Lalo, while fantastic, was mainly a 2-dimensional caricature of a character that we really didn't get to know in depth. Much like Saul was in Breaking Bad. I get that you'd have probably liked to have seen Lalo's character developed more, but the entire premise of the show was about how Jimmy McGill evolved/devolved into Saul Goodman. All the characters (except Kim who had a parallel change with Jimmy) were there mainly to serve that purpose.

quote:

the story line involving him and Nacho was where the show got back to the genius of Breaking Bad.


That wasn't the story they were interested in telling, though. They already did Breaking Bad. This was a completely different show. And I'm sure it wasn't a lot of Breaking Bad fans' cup of tea. Breaking Bad was absolutely brilliant and exciting, and probably much more re-watchable than Better Call Saul for most people, even those that love BCS. But I think Better Caul Saul was probably the better piece of "art." They learned a lot from BB, and think BCS is everybody in every department on their absolute "A" game.

You prefer a more exciting story--hell, almost everybody does, so this is not a judgment on you or others who feel the same way--but they told the story they wanted to tell about as well as humanly possible. It's a fricking masterpiece.
Posted by LaLadyinTx
Cypress, TX
Member since Nov 2018
5990 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Yea, they did a good job with that. I didn't like him either, but he was pretty much right about Jimmy, though.


I didn't hate him. I felt sorry for Chuck. He was mentally ill. I think the question about what Jimmy thought about Chuck is like a chicken and an egg. Was Jimmy truly that way or did what Chuck thought about him manifest itself in Jimmy? Chuck always treated Jimmy as though Chuck was superior in every way.

I loved all of the Chuck stuff. It was part of what made Jimmy who he was. The whole show was great.
Posted by LaLadyinTx
Cypress, TX
Member since Nov 2018
5990 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 11:04 am to
quote:

necessary to the plot. It was the misdirected focus and too much time spent by the writers on pointless law firm politics and bullshite that hurt. They should have let the Mike and cartel plot lines have more time at the expense of the law firm story line. Part of who Saul is was caused by his rejection by his brother and the hoity toity law firm; we get it. Best character on a flawed show was Lalo and the story line involving him and Nacho was where the show got back to the genius of Breaking Bad


Totally disagree. I loved all the law firm politics and Jimmy/Chuck backstory. It's literally my favorite part of the show. My least favorite is the end when it's Lalo and Nacho. I liked the character development early on more than the gang/drug stuff. I loved all Jimmy's crazy scams.
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10579 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I don't concede the show was flawed,

quote:

That wasn't the story they were interested in telling, though.


Take out the cartel and Mike story lines and it's just a legal melodrama like so many others we have already seen. They could also have focused more on the Gene on the run aspect, which was a good idea with poor execution and emphasis.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59013 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

I didn't hate him. I felt sorry for Chuck. He was mentally ill. I think the question about what Jimmy thought about Chuck is like a chicken and an egg. Was Jimmy truly that way or did what Chuck thought about him manifest itself in Jimmy? Chuck always treated Jimmy as though Chuck was superior in every way.



Very good point. And who knows. I don't we're supposed to. But one of the tragedies of their relationship was that Chuck was also jealous of Jimmy, because Jimmy was clearly their mother's favorite. She called out for him right before she died instead of Chuck, who was there in the room with her. And we didn't have to see their childhoods to know that this was probably always the case. Chuck resented Jimmy for that, and probably treated him the way we see him in the show most of their lives. And he also resented him for being more naturally charismatic and good with people, which helped him get away with stuff Chuck never could.

Which also goes back to your chicken or egg thing. Did Chuck treat Jimmy like a frickup because that's what he always was or was his being treated that way would made him act like that. And was Chuck always a smug, holier-than-thou, overachiever, or was he constantly trying to win his mother's love/affection? Even if it was subconscious on some level. I'm sure they both fricked each other up to some extent.

Identity is an obviously huge theme of the show. And it's not just how others see us, it's more about how we see ourselves. And I don't think Jimmy nor Chuck were very secure with who they were fully--Jimmy was a frick up, but good with people, Chuck was a super high-achiever, but bad with people--and those insecurities manifested in resentments because both know the other had what they didn't.

But again, which came 1st? I don't think it matters. I think the point is that neither figured it out in time, and it fricked up not just their own relationship, but their relationships with other people as well.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14249 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:42 pm to
Sandy Duncan replacing Valerie Harper on ‘Valerie’ => ‘Valerie’s Family: The Hogans’ => ‘The Hogan Family’
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66404 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Parks and Rec after Mark left.


I dont think that’s Mark related. That show took off second season when the ramped up Ron and Andy and the addition of Chris and Ben.

He wasn’t my favorite character but the show was on the way up before he left

another answer that idk if it’s technically in the spirit of the question but Coach leaving and Winston coming onto New Girl.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 3:09 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63906 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:43 pm to
I don't think it's that complicated. Chuck was a well respected lawyer (self-made, no legacy) and his little brother was a frickup. Chuck respected the law, he revered it like a religion. It was everything to him. After bailing Jimmy out over and over, he gave him an ultimatum that you come back to New Mexico with me and I'll set you up with a mail room job but this is the last time I'm bailing you out from your shenanigans. If you ever frick up again, you are on your own, cut off, no help, I don't care if it's a parking violation. This is your final chance.

Jimmy followed all the rules, while working in the mail room, went and got an online law degree and passed the bar, without telling anyone, all the while not fricking around hustling people.

It was a shock to Charles when he found out. Everyone at the firm knew Jimmy as the likable "Charlie Hustle" but Chuck knew what a firecracker he really was.

I don't think it was resentment at all. Chuck didn't want that liability employed at a firm with his own name on the building, a BAR accredidation to Jimmy was like giving a chimp an AK47, in Charles' words.

He didn't want Jimmy anywhere near his own legacy that he built over decades, unless he was the mail clerk. Charles is very supportive of Jimmy working outside of the firm, doing public defender work, a very honorable and noble pursuit of the law, until Jimmy starts ripping off Chuck's "NIL" so to speak on billboards.

It's that simple.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 5:16 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51366 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:52 pm to
Bewitched
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram