Started By
Message

re: George Lucas

Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:39 pm to
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:39 pm to
If he didn't frick up the original trilogy and bury the theatrical versions I wouldn't hate him at all
Posted by jaydoubleyew
Downtown
Member since Oct 2011
726 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 2:40 pm to
I think the prevailing narrative with people that hate him is that he caught lightning in a bottle with a good idea, the people around him made it successful, and he played little to no role in Star Wars becoming the cultural icon It is.

I disagree with this wholeheartedly. His weakest spot is probably his directing, and he knows this. He only got stuck with the prequels because no one else would do it. Honesty it was a no win situation.
Posted by DrunkerThanThou
Unfortunately Mississippi
Member since Feb 2013
2846 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:04 pm to
I think it became hate when he went back and added CGI and changed scenes in the original trilogy. Lucas is creative and can create an imaginative universe that captures peoples devotion. He is NOT a good filmmaker and can't convey his vision to others. It helps to think of him as some autistic genius that can solve abstract equations but can't communicate with people.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:22 pm to
It's like Corch O and Les Miles.

Everyone admits it was time for Les to move on and we all thanked him. Then we got the Corch and a ton of folks are like damn sure do miss what we had.


Same thing. Time for GL to go but damn sure do miss what we had.
This post was edited on 1/19/18 at 4:34 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81620 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Jar Jar sucks for adults, but he was a huge money maker for Lucas. Huge money maker.
I did not know that. I do know that my 11 year old loves Star Wars and has LOTS of Star Wars toys/merch. He thinks Jar Jar is the worst character in any of the movies.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36040 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Why didn’t he make any SW movies from 84-98?
quote:

He was waiting for Kenner/Hasbro to screw up their contract with him regarding the royalty fees. Figured there was no point in making movies if he can't make more money off of the toys.

I just made that up, but it's my theory and I'm sticking with it.

He did tell Kenner/Hasbro that he was going to rest the franchise. Which he did.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36040 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 4:36 pm to
American Graffiti is still his best and most complete film.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

I loved American Graffitti but it's very hand held Linklater style of movie.

Then he did Star Wars and exploded into a cult of personality and toys and he didn't even direct his best movie.

Dude hit the lottery with Star Wars and Indy franchise let others really do everything.

His big thing for the consumer wasn't toys it was THX, home theater sound systems.



remember reading an article where he lamented the lack of technology in the movie theaters, esp audio ... think it was probably after V, but can't remember ... honestly don't think he wanted to make a movie till the technology of showing the film caught up ...
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

quote:
Jar Jar sucks for adults, but he was a huge money maker for Lucas. Huge money maker.
I did not know that. I do know that my 11 year old loves Star Wars and has LOTS of Star Wars toys/merch. He thinks Jar Jar is the worst character in any of the movies.


most of us don't think of jar jar as a character ...

we absolutely view him as an abomination ...
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14180 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 8:12 pm to
The sad thing is he was such a fan of CGI that he overloaded the prequels ....but it was the unique combination of live action and special effects in the original trilogy that really gave the movies a unique feel. Too much CGI makes everything cartoony.

I really liked the way they went back to the original feel of Star Wars in Rogue One....and the others too...even if they writing sucked.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

I enjoy the Star Wars series, but I wouldn’t call myself a huge fan or anything. I’m somewhat intrigued by the fact that George Lucas created a universe that millions adore, and yet he is despised my many of its biggest fans. When did the hardcore fans start to turn on Lucas? Why didn’t he make any SW movies from 84-98? And is there still a small segment of SW junkies that defend Lucas? Or is he universally disliked by SW fans across the board?


we don't hate him ... we just hate losing the feeling of the originals, even if we don't like the ewoks ... i think he went too cgi/special effects with the prequels, instead of concentrating on characters and story ... and reducing the 'force' to a molecular presence in anakin's blood was a horrible decision, imo ...
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5525 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 8:22 am to
He fricked up the original movies by adding a bunch of CGI bullshite.

The prequels were a mess from JarJar to whiny arse Hayden Christiansen cast as Vader, he made young Vader look like a complete pussy.
Posted by Bankshot
Member since Jun 2006
5374 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 9:54 am to
quote:

honestly don't think he wanted to make a movie till the technology of showing the film caught up


A lot of it was this. I remember he also spent time watching other films being made behind the scenes, including BTTF 2 and 3. After ILM created the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park he knew that technology had at least caught up to what he was wanting to do.
Posted by Tempratt
WRMS Girls Soccer Team Kicks arse
Member since Oct 2013
13345 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:14 pm to
Did anyone here ever see THX 1138? I bought it at target one day but never watched it.
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

He fricked up the original movies by adding a bunch of CGI bullshite.

The prequels were a mess from JarJar to whiny arse Hayden Christiansen cast as Vader, he made young Vader look like a complete pussy.


c'mon ... no one looked at the originals and thought the 3 minute touch-ups with cgi screwed anything up ...
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35489 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:22 pm to
Yeah, it's probably his 3rd best film behind A New Hope and American Grafitti.

And American Grafitti is a great film. So I give him credit for that.

I don't know if he wrote the script...I doubt it because the diaglogue is great and Lucas sucks arse at dialogue.

That scene with Toad trying to buy liqour is one of the most iconic scenes that it has been copied countless times.

Superbad totally copied it to a tee. Just ripped it off with no apologies because the AG scene is so iconic it's basically in the public domain.
Posted by DarthTiger
Member since Sep 2005
2745 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:25 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:09 am
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29377 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Then he did Star Wars and exploded into a cult of personality and toys and he didn't even direct his best movie.

Dude hit the lottery with Star Wars and Indy franchise let others really do everything.


George is a creative genius. But George needs oversight. Star Wars was great because George couldn’t do everything he wanted to because he didn’t have the clout. So he made an amazing movie. Same with Indy. Those are still very much Spielberg movies
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20378 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

The sad thing is he was such a fan of CGI that he overloaded the prequels ....but it was the unique combination of live action and special effects in the original trilogy that really gave the movies a unique feel. Too much CGI makes everything cartoony.

The unprecedented and painstaking attention to detail with the effects (and the creativity involved with creating them) in Star Wars (A New Hope for you youngsters) is what skyrocketed his career. All those intricate models were fantastic.

American Graffiti was an iconic film that spawned the Happy Days shows (a major part of my childhood with Happy Days, Laverne and Shirley, and then Mork and Mindy with the emergence of Robin Williams). About half the cast of Happy Days and Laverne and Shirley were in Graffiti, and Happy Days incorporated Arnold's Drive-in and a lot of the setting.

Raiders of the Lost Ark was a fantastic adventure. Absolutely didn't hurt that he got Harrison Ford to star in it, although I think it was intended for Tom Selleck.

George really went overboard with CGI later; it made his job easier as a creator, but it detracted from the charm because it was too easy.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69071 posts
Posted on 1/21/18 at 12:56 am to







first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram