
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/26/26 at 7:52 am to Sam Quint
that movie was average at best
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:11 am to Sam Quint
quote:
Not sure if serious.
NOPE and Us didn't touch on race at all IMO.
Get Out seemed to be lambasting rich white coastal elites more than southerners.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:31 am to 3nOut
quote:
Get Out seemed to be lambasting rich white
quote:
white
How is that not about race? And it didn't just touch it, it hit you over the head with it.
I'm ok with that because the movie was pretty up front about what it was, but race was the point of the movie. I haven't seen the other two.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:58 am to dallastiger55
quote:
Best picture lol
We all know why it was nominated.
and we all know why this board hates it
Posted on 10/26/26 at 10:17 am to Byron Bojangles III
It was a meh movie
Why wouldn’t this board hate it
Why wouldn’t this board hate it
Posted on 10/26/26 at 10:21 am to PurpleandGold Motown
It was alright for my purposes, but it was just a movie that was on when I was about to go to sleep in a hotel room. I thought the scene where knockoff Bootsy Collins and break dancers showed up was pretty odd though.
This post was edited on 10/26/26 at 10:22 am
Posted on 10/26/26 at 11:38 am to 3nOut
quote:
NOPE and Us didn't touch on race at all IMO.
lol dont tell that to the critics
Posted on 10/26/26 at 2:39 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
It's kinda funny that folks blame race for why the movie had the reception it did and why it won the awards it got (which I do agree with the argument) but at the same time lack any self awareness when claiming the movie as "objectively terrible".
The movie was a decent one time watch but by no means was an "objectively terrible" movie. By definition it can't even be that.
The movie was a decent one time watch but by no means was an "objectively terrible" movie. By definition it can't even be that.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 3:27 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
I thought it was good.
good, not great, not worthy of academy awards... just good.
good, not great, not worthy of academy awards... just good.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 3:50 pm to BigGreenTiger
Yeah.
Anyone who tries to act like it was really bad/shitty is just trying too hard...harder than the people who gave it 16 Oscar nominations.
Anyone who tries to act like it was really bad/shitty is just trying too hard...harder than the people who gave it 16 Oscar nominations.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 3:50 pm to Sun God
quote:
It was a meh movie Why wouldn’t this board hate it
Hating something you find “meh” is a bit contradictory
Posted on 10/26/26 at 5:32 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
its a decent movie with a stupid segment for 'da culcha' but yeah everyone who glazed this movie are either black or dont want to look racist
Posted on 10/26/26 at 8:05 pm to taylork37
quote:.
It's kinda funny that folks blame race for why the movie had the reception it did and why it won the awards it got (which I do agree with the argument) but at the same time lack any self awareness when claiming the movie as "objectively terrible". The movie was a decent one time watch but by no means was an "objectively terrible" movie. By definition it can't even be that.
Agreed. It was objectively "fine"
Posted on 10/26/26 at 8:12 pm to taylork37
quote:
It's kinda funny that folks blame race for why the movie had the reception it did and why it won the awards it got (which I do agree with the argument) but at the same time lack any self awareness when claiming the movie as "objectively terrible".
The movie was a decent one time watch but by no means was an "objectively terrible" movie. By definition it can't even be that.
I never brought race into this. In fact, slavery and vampirism is well trod soil in fiction. This movie was just poorly written, poorly executed and poorly acted.
I think what really turned me was that it could not just lean into anything. Was it a think piece about sharecropping and Jim Crow? Was it a gangster movie? Was it a horror film? A creature feature? It never decided. It tried to be everything and was nothing.
Great movies don't try to be everything. They pick a lane, excel and proceed at speed.
I stand by my assertion, this movie was arse.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:43 pm to Roaad
quote:
The music was phenomenal
Yeah it was, both the jazz and irish stuff.
The music makes the movie, and I’m pretty sure anyone’s appreciation of the movie hinges on how much they enjoyed the music
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
.harder than the people who gave it 16 Oscar nominations.
You cannot help being a chode.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 10:44 pm to blueboy
quote:
None of them have ever won the Black Director Challenge - making a movie that isn't in some way about racial shite.
It's actually kind of incredible that I can't think of even one.
Four Brothers, King Arthur, Hope Floats, Nope, Training Day, Southpaw, Shooter, Widows, etc aren't about race. There are a ton more examples.
Inside Man wasn't about race either, so even Spike Lee himself wins the challenge.
This post was edited on 10/26/26 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 10/26/26 at 11:06 pm to JDsJersey
quote:Huh? It was about crusading Jewish bank robbers who bust a Nazi banker guy.
Inside Man wasn't about race eithe
Four Brothers, Nope and Training Day definitely have racial components. I haven't seen the rest.
But that's still like 90%+. Seriously.

Popular
Back to top



2













