Started By
Message

re: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness SPOILERS THREAD

Posted on 5/11/22 at 8:02 am to
Posted by schatman
Montana
Member since Nov 2018
2958 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 8:02 am to
Avengers were always Marvel's flagship, though they didn't sell as well as X-Men. They were Marvel's best and brightest. I'd argue that The Ultimates- maybe 2001?- brought them back to the forefront and paved the way for the movie some 10 years later.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 8:33 am to
Comics are pretty much irrelevant at this point. The Disney/Marvel Avengers are the most popular superheros in movies. I’ll include Spider-Man and GotG in that. They blow X-Men out of the water.

Two of the main Avengers are gone. Thor and GotG are coming up on probably their last movie. You have Spider-Man, who Disney doesn’t own, Dr Strange is a mixed bag. Eternals was a fail. Captain Marvel was a fail.

It’s not about the remaining popular comic characters they have. It’s about their current direction and their ability to make movies that make nobody’s popular. It’s not there like it used to be. Disney needs to start thinking about their direction and how to get their magic back. They’re essentially going to have to reboot X-Men and blend it with their universe. And they don’t have a lot of the big dogs to help the blend process anymore (ie iron man/Spider-Man). Seems like they wanted Strange to do that and I’m not sure that has the star power iron man did.

We’ll see where it goes, but this is an interesting time for them.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37539 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Thor and GotG are coming up on probably their last movie.


I may be wrong but I would think the god killer story arc might be a trilogy. Although that's a Thor story rather than GoTG. No idea what GoTG will do
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Avengers were always Marvel's flagship


Disagree. X-Men have been the flagship from the late 80s until the MCU. That 90s avengers line-up . There's a reason we got all those X-men movies in the 2000s.
Posted by schatman
Montana
Member since Nov 2018
2958 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:34 am to
Lol. Downvotes for the truth, I guess? But whatever. Avengers were the flagship just like Justice League was the flagship for DC- though New Teen Titans far outsold it.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:35 am to
I know Gunn said this is his last movie, although the characters could still go on.

Thor I’m more worried about because of it’s creative direction. Not that I’m against it, but it seems to be getting the shun treatment already. They may continue that storyline, but if it’s not we’ll received, that will throw a wrench in that.

They need a new glue. Iron Man was their glue. Strange I don’t think can be their glue. Spider-Man is going to have to be, but that means Sony has them by the balls.

I want to believe X-Men will save them, but I’m starting to have concerns about the creative quality. We’ll see.
Posted by schatman
Montana
Member since Nov 2018
2958 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:37 am to
quote:

There's a reason we got all those X-men movies in the 2000s.


Yep.
Because Bryan Singer wanted to make a movie about young people that were freaks and didn't belong. Take that as you will.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Lol. Downvotes for the truth, I guess?


Your opinions aren't the truth. Even in the Ultimate universe the X-Men were more popular than the Avengers. Ask yourself why we didn't get a Captain America, Iron Man or Thor movie until 2008. It's because they weren't popular.

That Avengers team of Black Knight, Cersi, Hercules, Black Widow and Crystal was lit! I'm sure it must have sold stupid numbers.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:38 am to
And there’s a reason The Avengers and GotG blew the X-Men movies out of the water.

Creative quality. The name alone will not make or break the success. It’s the creative quality that will matter.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Yep.
Because Bryan Singer wanted to make a movie about young people that were freaks and didn't belong. Take that as you will.


Yeah it had nothing to do with the popularity of the IP. You're an idiot if you believe that.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:41 am to
quote:

And there’s a reason The Avengers and GotG blew the X-Men movies out of the water.

Creative quality. The name alone will not make or break the success. It’s the creative quality that will matter.


Well that's not entirely true. They also had the benefit of coming after all these other movies. Take the X-Men movies in context of their time. You can't compare the original X-Men movie or X-2 to GotG or the Avengers. That's a silly comparison. Now I'm not about to defend the quality of the later X-Men movies, but X-2 probably hit some records for its time when it released.

Without the success of movies like Spider-Man and X-2, there is no Avengers or GotG.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 9:43 am
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:41 am to
I’m talking about the ones that released around the same time.

Apocalypse
Dark Phoenix

They were poorly received.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 9:43 am
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I’m talking about the ones that released around the same time.


I edited my post. I agree with you there. That's definitely true.
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4704 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:45 am to
quote:


I enjoyed the movie overall but that jump scare in the tunnels was so dumb and probably bothers me way more than it should Like they saw her rip through doors effortlessly and then she for some reason chose not to do the same to this particular door, then they just stopped running to watch the door for like a minute just to keep running when she came around the corner.


I agree. I was like WTF there. Keep running. Up to that point I loved the chase. Gave me a "The Shinning" vibe.

And poor Charles, so many differences between the multiverse characters but seems like he'll always be in a wheelchair no matter the universe.
This post was edited on 5/11/22 at 10:46 am
Posted by ThoseGuys
Wishing I was back in NC
Member since Nov 2012
2627 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 10:45 am to
I've been a comic book fan for 30+ years. I own thousands of comics ranging from early 70s to current stuff. I have subscriptions and get sent blind boxes regularly.

Know what I have the least of? Avengers. The Avengers weren't even Marvel's answer to Justice Society, it was the Fantastic Four.

Comic history have an MCU bias. People think these movies and characters that are super popular must have always been popular. That's simply not the case. Iron Man was never a top draw for Marvel. The GotG were never a draw.

When Marvel was selling off movie rights, Ghost Rider and Daredevil were bought but Thor and Iron Man wasn't. Think about that now. Movie studios didn't think movies featuring Thor and Iron Man would be successful but that Ghost Rider would be.

Kevin Feige has shown he can make B list characters into stars. He just has to prove the first round wasn't luck and do it again.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4931 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Ghost Rider and Daredevil were bought but Thor and Iron Man wasn't.


Yep. There was a time in the 90s when the most popular marvel characters were Spidey, Wolverine & Ghost Rider. The ONLY reason I got into Iron Man comics for a bit in the 90s was because of the animated series.

Believe it or not, I think video games helped an avengers resurgence too in the 2000s. Games like Marvel vs Capcom and Marvel Ultimate Alliance helped to bring some of those characters more top of mind for people. In each of those instances, Marvel vs Capcom and Marvel Ultimate Alliance, they were BOTH preceding by X-Men games before going into the wider Marvel universe.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37539 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Thor I’m more worried about because of it’s creative direction


Absolutely

quote:

They may continue that storyline,


God killer is the only thing planned I really have heard about and want to see.

I was interested in something different from what they did in MOM with Scarlet Witch so that's a dead end. The Eternals was a bit of a turd.

If Gunn is leaving Guardians then what's left. Xmen has a lot of material but they keep mucking around with bad versions of Dark Phoenix
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77773 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Xmen has a lot of material but they keep mucking around with bad versions of Dark Phoenix


Well, Fox X-Men and a MCU X-Men would be vastly different.

Plus, like others have mentioned, there's the MCU roll-out of the Fantastic Four. Between the two franchises, there's literally a dozen movies to be made that could be the entirety of Phase 6 & 7 without ever circling back to Kang in Ant-Man 3.
Posted by forever lsu30
Member since Nov 2005
4039 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 12:54 pm to
Watched last night with my teen son.
$5 Tuesdays in summer months cannot be beat.

We left with far more questions than answers. Here's the off the top of my head ones.

1. What was the ridiculous point of the super cartoony animated octopus destroying 616 Dr. Strange's city? The claim of Scarlet Witch chasing this kid thru all the Universes & we end up with that stupid animal? C'mon...
(Amazing that I made it thru all 13 pages of this thread & no one else mentioned this ridiculousness)
We REALLY didn't even need that entire waste of 15 minutes. They could've maintained the dark theme of this movie to explain/show was Wanda had been doing.

2. Clea shows up & we know she ultimately ends up as Mrs. Strange in the comics. Will the movies follow the same storyline here?

3. The universe jumping thru a fricking STAR shape portal is what we get? Good grief that's turrible.

4. So the Illuminati is all arrogant & supposedly powerful together yet Wanda just ends them inside of 15 minutes?

5. We had better CGI on Harvey Dent in Nolan's Batman than we got on Zombie Dr. Strange. Why go so cartoon when you're going so digital CGI in everything else in these movies?

6. Rachel McAdams hasn't seen a dermatologist after all these years & her millions earned?
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51733 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

What was the ridiculous point of the super cartoony animated octopus destroying 616 Dr. Strange's city?

Wanda sent it after America most likely to get her power or to get her to jump to 616
quote:

Will the movies follow the same storyline here?

Probably
quote:

So the Illuminati is all arrogant & supposedly powerful together yet Wanda just ends them inside of 15 minutes?

They completely underestimated her as their Wanda is no threat at all not to mention the only person who may be able to beat Wanda without the Darkhol would be BB or CM the team didn’t stand much a chance. SW Wanda is regarded as one of the strongest characters in Marvel
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram