- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Charlie's Angels cancelled. Shock of the century.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 3:51 pm to Froman
Totally forgot about this show too. How many weeks did it last before it got cancelled?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 3:54 pm to Jamohn
I couldn't tell you. The article says there are seven already finished.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:25 pm to Froman
Why does Hollywood think they can just go into the old time machine, pull out something from the past, insert unknowns in place of those that made the roles successful and wa-la... instant hit?
It hasn't yet worked for television for sure that I can recall. See Knight Rider, Wonder Woman, Charlie's Angels, etc.
It hasn't yet worked for television for sure that I can recall. See Knight Rider, Wonder Woman, Charlie's Angels, etc.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:28 pm to classictiger
quote:
Why does Hollywood think they can just go into the old time machine, pull out something from the past, insert unknowns in place of those that made the roles successful and wa-la... instant hit?
They just can't come up with any ideas of their own anymore.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:48 pm to Froman
quote:i figured it would last a couple of weeks because of the hotness of minka but eventually would fold
Charlie's Angels cancelled. Shock of the century.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:50 pm to classictiger
quote:
Why does Hollywood think they can just go into the old time machine, pull out something from the past, insert unknowns in place of those that made the roles successful and wa-la... instant hit?
It hasn't yet worked for television for sure that I can recall
Hawaii Five-0. It's a pretty big hit, and I really like it.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:58 pm to lsutigersFTW
But the true Angels will live forever!
Posted on 10/14/11 at 5:01 pm to oompaw
Did you know that Farrah was only on the show for one season?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 5:43 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Who keeps making these decisions to remake shows that appeal to nobody?
Who couldn't tell that Wonder Woman and Charlie's Angels would be canned quickly?
Where is my MacGuyver remake? That shite would be a ratings monster, guaranteed.
Who couldn't tell that Wonder Woman and Charlie's Angels would be canned quickly?
Where is my MacGuyver remake? That shite would be a ratings monster, guaranteed.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 5:48 pm to Froman
I watched it for a second just because of minka. it seemed pretty terrible.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 8:08 pm to lsutigersFTW
quote:
quote:
Why does Hollywood think they can just go into the old time machine, pull out something from the past, insert unknowns in place of those that made the roles successful and wa-la... instant hit?
It hasn't yet worked for television for sure that I can recall
Hawaii Five-0. It's a pretty big hit, and I really like it.
Yeah this would be the outlier example but the remake is very different than the original, except for the name, setting, and theme music. They really didn't go the cookie-cutter route with that one.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 8:39 pm to classictiger
quote:
Did you know that Farrah was only on the show for one season?
Yes I do and I didn't miss a single episode that first season.
And this was on my wall:
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:15 am to oompaw
quote:
Who keeps making these decisions to remake shows that appeal to nobody? Who couldn't tell that Wonder Woman and Charlie's Angels would be canned quickly?
Amen. Maybe they should hire us because we sure as hell could tell from the get go. If they were smart they would call AMC and HBO and get some pointers.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 3:45 am to oompaw
Farrah Fawcett was absolutely gorgeous. The other two were beautiful but Farrah put them to shame.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 11:27 am to Froman
Called this the day I heard the idea of it. 
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:09 pm to Fearthehat0307
I will miss Minka Kelly. Never saw the show but enjoyed seeing her.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:28 pm to classictiger
quote:
Why does Hollywood think they can just go into the old time machine, pull out something from the past, insert unknowns in place of those that made the roles successful and wa-la... instant hit?
A re-make is not in and of itself a bad idea. They do it because the brand theoretically has a ready audience and you don't need to sell folks on the concept of your show. The problem they often make isn't using the old property but by making something that sucks with it. I suspect that what happens is that they pump money into making the pilot and even if it sucks they figure they can get something back on their investment due to the brand of the show. Thus, a terrible show that is a re-make has a better chance of making it to broadcast than a terrible non-remake show.
Popular
Back to top


6










