Started By
Message

Anyone else have have issues watching a movie after reading the book?

Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:22 am
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24884 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:22 am
Wonder if I'm alone in this...

Anytime I read a book and a movie is later made about it, I can't enjoy the movie.

It just feels like I'm watching a badly acted play from a badly written screenplay.

I don't read as much as I should, but I used to read a lot of Grisham and Chrichton. Never read Jurassic Park thank goodness. But every movie made from the books were not good to me.

I bought the Ready Player One book a while back and then immediately learned they were making a movie, so I never even opened the book.

It would've completely made the movie unwatchable to me. Wasn't a great movie, but had some cool effects.
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 10:25 am
Posted by sweetwaterbilly
Member since Mar 2017
19351 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Never read Jurassic Park thank goodness


TIL Jurassic Park is a book
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36114 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Wonder if I'm alone in this...


If it's "anytime" you read a book, you're probably alone.

I have problems with some film adaptations, but there are certainly winners out there.

Even Dune, with the questionable acting and dialogue... I really enjoyed how they cast the film, and the special effects of the time.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36114 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

TIL Jurassic Park is a book
Big difference between reading Jurassic Park and seeing it on the big screen. One is marveling at Crichton making it seem plausible, the other is seeing a real fricking dinosaur on screen for the first time.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:34 am to
I don't have a problem with it, but I rarely find the movie better than the book. No Country For Old Men is maybe the only exception, but that book was written to be made into a movie, and really the cinematography is what made the difference for me.


I know it got terrible reviews, but I've had an itch to watch The Goldfinch. I enjoyed the book and am mostly just curious about how it plays out on film.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41241 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I don't have a problem with it, but I rarely find the movie better than the book.
Posted by Cregg
Orange Beach
Member since Jul 2017
2032 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:43 am to
I can see where your coming from. Shutter Island is an all time favorite book of mine. Still haven't watched the movie and probably never will. But on the other hand The Friends of Eddie Coyle is an all a favorite of mine but I love the movie as well. Guess it goes both ways.
Posted by LSUPERMAN
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
2510 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:43 am to
I might be alone here but I thought the Shining was a better movie than book.

Whats worst is reading a book, thinking what a cool movie it could become, only to have that movie come out and it is a giant ape turd! Yes I am looking at you, Congo!!
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Anyone else have have issues watching a movie after reading the book?
Wonder if I'm alone in this...


Generally speaking, the book is always better. It's virtually impossible to get everything that makes reading an entire story in a book into a movie.

My issue is not usually with what gets left out for time, but what gets shoehorned in despite already cutting a ton out.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:47 am to
quote:

No Country For Old Men is maybe the only exception,


Forest Gump stands out here for me. The book was a meandering bunch of crap for the most part. The movie was definitely more enjoyable, for me at least.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25890 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:48 am to
quote:


TIL Jurassic Park is a book




Not only that but I believe Spielberg was the one that really encouraged Crichton to write the The Lost World book that was later made into a movie as well.

ETA: Watching a movie of your favorite books isn't always bad.

The Harry Potter books were obviously better but the films were pretty solid for the most part and it was enjoyable seeing some of what I had imagined in my head "come to life."

Same goes for the Hobbit. Obviously there are all kind of problems with those movies but there were parts in there that was just how I imagined it and I really enjoyed it (Smaug scene, first 40 minutes of first film in Bilbo's house).

Ender's Game was a terrible movie.
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 10:50 am
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7520 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Wonder if I'm alone in this...


In this issue folks have been talking about since the dawn of movies? No...you're not alone.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30346 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:49 am to
The Natural may be the one book I’ve read that the movie was better.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Whats worst is reading a book, thinking what a cool movie it could become, only to have that movie come out and it is a giant ape turd! Yes I am looking at you, Congo!!


You typed Congo but I think you meant to type Ender's Game.

Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36114 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Yes I am looking at you, Congo!!

*cough* *cough* Timeline.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
17957 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:54 am to
Read Davinchi Code prior to Watching the movie and was VERY disappointed. Also read Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Movie was really good but just not the same.

I think it just boils down to our imagination being way more expansive than anything that can be put on screen.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19221 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Never read Jurassic Park thank goodness


quote:

TIL Jurassic Park is a book




It is an awesome book. It is responsible for me digging into chaos theory in my mid-20s.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24884 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Whats worst is reading a book, thinking what a cool movie it could become, only to have that movie come out and it is a giant ape turd! Yes I am looking at you, Congo!!


My favorite example of the worst movie from a book is "The Firm" by Grisham.
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 11:30 am
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6781 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Generally speaking, the book is always better. It's virtually impossible to get everything that makes reading an entire story in a book into a movie.


I have heard people say that The Godfather movie is better, and the book did have some parts that could have been cut, but you also get a lot of insight that they can't give you in the movie. The scene of the big meeting of all the families in the book gives you so much more insight into how the Dons thought about each other and the mindset of these people.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20559 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:53 am to
Not typically, but Gone Girl was an exception. I still really enjoyed the movie, but it follows so closely to what happens in the novel that it definitely limited my enjoyment of the film.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram