re: Any thoughts on Netflix "Who Killed JonBenet"?

Let’s be honest, the Boulder police screwed the pooch from the very beginning. Not treating the house as a crime scene right away was an enormous mistake. Secondly, why didn’t the police look for the point of entry when they arrived? If the Ramseys said all the doors were locked, how did the kidnapper get into the house? If the police had conducted a proper search, they would have gone to the basement to check for possible points of entry. In doing so, they would have found her body almost immediately. It’s ridiculous that her body wasn’t discovered until seven hours after the police arrived. Furthermore, if the police had found the body instead of John Ramsey, a lot of physical evidence might not have been destroyed when he removed the duct tape from her mouth and carried her upstairs.

I think it was....some Puerto Rican guy!!!!!

quote:

---

And as much as I lean towards something happening with Burke, I find it EXTREMELY hard to believe he wouldn't have said something like "we got in a fight" or "she stole my toy" during numerous police interviews alone as a 9 year old.

---

A nine year old is certainly old enough to conceal things if they don't want themselves or others to get in trouble.

During the interviews, he was asked to draw a family picture, and he omitted JonBenet. When presented with a photo of the bowl of pineapple, he got quieter and more fidgety.

Now, neither of those things are necessarily indicators of guilt; it seems like he was a weird kid. However, I believe it's highly possible he at least heard or saw something that night. If he suspected one or both parents of anything, even if he wasn't sure, I could see him keeping his mouth shut.

Overall, I agree with you though. There are so many bizarre factors in this case pulling opinions in different directions, I doubt it will ever be solved.

I can't get past the ransom note. It just seems completely out of place and makes no sense whatsoever.

So many things are hard to explain about this case.

One that stands out to me: If you are the father of a child that a note your wife finds says the child has been kidnapped, how on earth did he not search the entire house several times looking for her? I know if my child is missing I would frantically look through the house many times.

It just makes no sense that John had not looked in that room earlier.

quote:

---

I can't get past the ransom note. It just seems completely out of place and makes no sense whatsoever.

---

It's from the mother's own notebook.

She definitely had a hand in writing it.

convinced the brother did it and the family covered it up with that mess

If there never was a written ransom note, I could possibly believe the intruder theory.
But, that ransom note screams that the Ramseys had something to do with it

Watch the documentary. It was not the Ramsey’s even though the media fed us this. That is all discussed in the documentary. The guy admitted to it and to being in the home from 5 pm until they came home around 10 pm. He said he walked around and went in the parents room. The bonus check was laying out in view bc he had just received it. The killer had to have seen it and that stuck in his mind for the letter. He even talks about why he wrote the letter. They let him go bc of the DNA not matching but it was botched. So it’s not going to match.

quote:

---

I guess you are talking about the Karr fellow. Other than him confessing what proof is there that he did it?

---

I always took his false confession as just a grab at attention.

He is now a trans women so obviously has some issues.