- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:34 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
We don't even know what Catwoman is going to be doing in this movie. How can we be sure that this is miscasting?
quote:
if Selina Kyle is more than a side character/love interest then:
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:35 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
I was one of the few who said from the very beginning that Ledger was a great choice and he fit exactly what Nolan seemed to want. Guess what? I was right (as were others, I wasn't the ONLY one).
And because you were right then makes you right now? Give me a break. I was very neutral on the Ledger casting and took a "wait and see" approach to it all. I'm doing the same with Anne Hathaway. She's a good actress. I have no idea why people knock her.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:36 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
And if those people who were perplexed by the Ledger choice were wrong? So what. They probably didn't have a grasp for what Nolan set up with Begins, or what a good actor is. Ledger was the perfect choice.
Yeah, my problem with Ledger initially was I had a completely Joker in mind, more like Hamill's Joker. Complete with the deadly goofy gadgets. I completely got the tone off of the series, and Ledger at second glance was the man for the job.
But this isn't about the casting, this is about the character in and of itself. If it is anymore than a love interest, then Catwoman will likely bring down the film in quality. You can't just have continual buildup from 2 films with very threatening and competent antagonists, and just have Catwoman as the main one. If anything, the stakes should be at their highest on the final installment of a trilogy. Catwoman doesn't offer this, and while Bane may offer this to Batman himself, Bane is never a threat to Gotham at large. Although I am fine with Bane, there needs to be a more threatening antagonist that can put Gotham in peril.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:37 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And because you were right then makes you right now? Give me a break.
Not at all. Hence this:
quote:
So some people can be right and some people can be wrong, it's the way of the world.
I'm not saying that because some of us were right about Ledger that we will be right this time. I'm saying that saying "Ledger worked out even though people didn't think he would" isn't enough defense to say this is a good choice. That's all.
This post was edited on 1/19/11 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:37 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
I thought we had a thread about this a little while back? Maybe not.
Not. That was a bad rumor. That dude that started that thread post crappy rumors all the time.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:38 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I don't know why you are blowing up about Hathaway. She's an Oscar-nominated actress and does a very good job in most every movie she's in.
Have I said one word about Hathaway? She's a fine actress, but I just don't agree with the character she is to portray, IF that character is anything more than a love interest.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:41 pm to Freauxzen
And some people can be neither. Anne Hathaway is a good actress and because we know so little about what the story is she might just be the perfect choice to play the role. However, since I don't know enough about the plot I am not going to pass any judgments either for or against the decision to include Catwoman and the decision to put Anne Hathaway into that role.
However, Christopher Nolan seems to have a firm grasp on the world of Batman and also seems to be in complete control of the creative process for bringing his vision to the big screen. The man has made two VERY GOOD Batman movies thus far and I for one believe he wouldn't have agreed to write/direct a third movie if he didn't feel the story was worthy to put to screen.
I'm going to trust Christopher Nolan until he gives me a reason not to.
However, Christopher Nolan seems to have a firm grasp on the world of Batman and also seems to be in complete control of the creative process for bringing his vision to the big screen. The man has made two VERY GOOD Batman movies thus far and I for one believe he wouldn't have agreed to write/direct a third movie if he didn't feel the story was worthy to put to screen.
I'm going to trust Christopher Nolan until he gives me a reason not to.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:42 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Have I said one word about Hathaway? She's a fine actress, but I just don't agree with the character she is to portray, IF that character is anything more than a love interest.
Just because you don't have the creative capacity to create a story where Catwoman could be a viable and believable villain doesn't mean Nolan doesn't either.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:45 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And some people can be neither. Anne Hathaway is a good actress and because we know so little about what the story is she might just be the perfect choice to play the role. However, since I don't know enough about the plot I am not going to pass any judgments either for or against the decision to include Catwoman and the decision to put Anne Hathaway into that role.
I have 0 problem with Anne Hathaway. It's great if she's in the movie to be a love interest. That workls. It's Catwoman that everyone has the issue with.
quote:
However, Christopher Nolan seems to have a firm grasp on the world of Batman and also seems to be in complete control of the creative process for bringing his vision to the big screen. The man has made two VERY GOOD Batman movies thus far and I for one believe he wouldn't have agreed to write/direct a third movie if he didn't feel the story was worthy to put to screen.
But IF Catwoman is in the movie, that doesn't seem Nolan-esque at all.
quote:
I'm going to trust Christopher Nolan until he gives me a reason not to.
I trust Christopher Nolan. I don't trust movie studios and producers. This seems like a "Cast a pretty girl and use Catwoman because we need to empower woman" thinking. A jewel thief doesn't fit Nolan's world at all. That would be my argument. Hence the "Venom" reference.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:46 pm to Freauxzen
I don't think that the studio is forcing any of these characters into the next film. I think WB has learned not to intervene in any of Nolan's writing or ideas. That said, I think that it's interesting that these two characters were selected. With all the speculation over who would play what, and who the new protagonists would be, Selina Kyle was one of the first characters Nolan was vehemently against. Now that it has been announced that Selina Kyle will be in the movie indicates that the earlier comments from Nolan about Catwoman could have been a smokescreen all along. Tom Hardy as Bane isn't a choice anyone was predicting when he was signed back in October. As Freaux said, there were a lot of people scratching their heads over Heath playing the Joker and look how that turned out. If anything, Nolan has proven himself with his scripts and his films to date. No one knows how much either of these characters will figure into the final film. Let Nolan do his thing and enjoy the final product.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:49 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
But IF Catwoman is in the movie, that doesn't seem Nolan-esque at all.
How so? Catwoman has no powers. Some incarnations have before but not in the books.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:53 pm to Murray
It seems very interesting that Warner Bros never said "catwoman" they said Selina Kyle. Im still hoping we see Talia as the main female villain
Posted on 1/19/11 at 1:57 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Anne Hathaway is a good actress
Link?
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:01 pm to RLDSC FAN
I'm somewhat glad that Talia al Ghul isn't one of the villains. It shows that Nolan has seemingly more creative juice inside of him as he's not settling for the simple revenge plot that would have been offered by putting Talia into the third movie.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:03 pm to dslsufan80
This sounds like the studio pushed her into this film casting.
Some backroom deal took place I guarantee.
She's Hollywood's IT girl right now.
Some backroom deal took place I guarantee.
She's Hollywood's IT girl right now.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:04 pm to OMLandshark
I didn't click the link but I hope for all our sakes it was from bleacher report
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:04 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Academy Award nominee for Best Actress in a Leading Role for her performance in "Rachel Getting Married"
Winner, Critics Choice Award for Best Actress - Leading Role for "Rachel Getting Married"
2 Golden Globe Nominations for Best Actress in a Leading Role for "Love and Other Drugs" as well as "Rachel Getting Married"
Critically acclaimed performances in such movies as "Brokeback Mountain" and "The Devil Wears Prada."
I could go on and on.
Winner, Critics Choice Award for Best Actress - Leading Role for "Rachel Getting Married"
2 Golden Globe Nominations for Best Actress in a Leading Role for "Love and Other Drugs" as well as "Rachel Getting Married"
Critically acclaimed performances in such movies as "Brokeback Mountain" and "The Devil Wears Prada."
I could go on and on.
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:09 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I'm somewhat glad that Talia al Ghul isn't one of the villains. It shows that Nolan has seemingly more creative juice inside of him as he's not settling for the simple revenge plot that would have been offered by putting Talia into the third movie.
I understood your point before, but now you're championing Catwoman because everyone else is against it. This statement is ridiculous.
Talia would have been the BEST villain for this outside of maybe Strange and Black Mask.
She has a better story than Catwoman, she would provide more avenues than just jewel thief. She's flat out more interesting, hell even Batman thinks so seeing as he married and sired a child with her. /shrug
Posted on 1/19/11 at 2:11 pm to Murray
quote:
How so? Catwoman has no powers. Some incarnations have before but not in the books.
A jewel thief? In a setting that is dominated by organized crime and the criminally insane? She doesn't fit.
Popular
Back to top


1





