- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who’s your top 10 heavyweight boxers of all time?
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:02 am to InkStainedWretch
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:02 am to InkStainedWretch
I think it was the way Norton held his hands almost like a crab a times that flummoxed Ali especially in the first fight. I've seen some boxing scribes say you can make an argument for Norton winning all three fights. To me Norton certainly won the 3rd fight. I can't really speak about the 2nd one.
Norton was a slow starter and chinny early in fights. What Gerry Cooney did to him was absolutely savage.
Norton was a slow starter and chinny early in fights. What Gerry Cooney did to him was absolutely savage.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:05 am to ronricks
I think he had a better argument for the second fight. He and his corner fricked up in the third fight, thought they were in control and coasted through the final round, which was a bad mistake. Ali closed with one of the best rounds of his career in the second fight and it paid off.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:29 am to LSUFanMizeWay
No Frazier???? You are an idiot.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:32 am to LSUFanMizeWay
quote:
10&11 are the Klitscko Brothers
I think as far as modern heavyweights go, Usyk and Fury (who beat Wladimir Klitsko) would be over them. Fury was looking like he could go down as a top 5-8 all-time and Usyk pummeled him twice. It'd be hard to put Fury over him now on an all time list but Usyk is *only* 23-0. 23 wins isn't necessarily a lot when you talk all-time but my god he's incredible.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:42 am to iwyLSUiwy
Usyk has chops but I personally don’t like to rate anyone in any sport as far as their standing all time until they are retired, until all their hay is in the barn.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:51 am to InkStainedWretch
quote:
InkStainedWretch
Wladimir was for sure, but his brother Vitaly was pretty much an action fighter who did his best to bust up his opponents in his fights.
Too bad some of that pure aggression wasn't part of Wladimir's DNA as it would have saved Manny Stewart many pleadings and lectures to try to get him to up his game in the ring.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:54 am to InkStainedWretch
Definitely fair. I would have locked in Fury as top 10 not too long ago... then Usyk came along. Still had a great career and definitely fringe top 10, but the same thing could happen to Ustk at some point. He's got a bit of an odd career. You usually don't see someone be in their prime at age 38 and only have 23 fights.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 10:58 am to gumbo2176
I would have
1) Ali
2) Joe Louis
3) Joe Frazier
4) Lennox Lewis
5) George Foreman
6) Holyfield
7) Tyson
8) Larry Holmes
9) Jack Dempsey
10) Rocky Marciano
11) Sonny Liston
12) Jack Johnson
13) Wladimir Klitschko
14) Oleksandr Usyk
15) Riddick Bowe
16) Tyson Fury
17) James Jefferies
18) Vitali Klitschko
19) Floyd Patterson
20) Gene Tunny
just missing would be Anthony Joshua, Ken Norton
IMO Lennox Lewis is the most under rated fighter.....Tyson would be top 3 if he hadnt went to jail, maybe #1. He had the potential to be greatest ever
1) Ali
2) Joe Louis
3) Joe Frazier
4) Lennox Lewis
5) George Foreman
6) Holyfield
7) Tyson
8) Larry Holmes
9) Jack Dempsey
10) Rocky Marciano
11) Sonny Liston
12) Jack Johnson
13) Wladimir Klitschko
14) Oleksandr Usyk
15) Riddick Bowe
16) Tyson Fury
17) James Jefferies
18) Vitali Klitschko
19) Floyd Patterson
20) Gene Tunny
just missing would be Anthony Joshua, Ken Norton
IMO Lennox Lewis is the most under rated fighter.....Tyson would be top 3 if he hadnt went to jail, maybe #1. He had the potential to be greatest ever
Posted on 2/25/25 at 11:03 am to InkStainedWretch
Joe Louis
Ali
Lennox Lewis
Larry Holmes
Oleksander Usyk
Vitali Klitschko
George Foreman
Jack Johnson
Rocky Marciano
Gene Tunney
Holyfield, Vlad, and Dempsey next three
Louis was dominant for a decade, and his only loses were to Schmeling (avenged), Ezzard Charles (one of the greatest light heavyweights ever), and Marciano when he was old.
Ali got gifted a lot of decisions, but he won the lineal 3 times. Can't take that away from him. The wins over Liston, Foreman and Frazier (although Frazier is overrated historically) is his legacy.
Lennox cleaned house in one of the best eras in heavyweight history and avenged both fluke losses. Dominated the other two best heavyweights of his era.
Larry Holmes owned the heavyweight division for 7 years. It wasn't the strongest era but Holmes fought all comers and won them all until Spinks, another of the light heavyweight ATGs.
Usyk has beaten the next three best heavyweights and did it decisively, all while giving up several inches and lots of pounds. Head to head, he's one of the greatest of all time. His motor, defensive skills, footwork, and handspeed are all at a level most heavyweights haven't seen and has enough power at 6'3" 220 lbs to be a champion in any era.
Vitali was untouchable after Lewis retired. Boring af to watch, but untouchable.
Foreman regaining the title in 1994 cemented his legacy. Before his comeback, he was like Tyson "he could have been so great if only he had a brain". The comeback showed he was a lot more than a puncher.
Jack Johnson revolutionized the sport. The color barrier is one thing, but Johnson's defensive prowess at the time was second to none. He started a new era when he beat Jeffries.
Marciano retiring undefeated is still a great accomplishment. Head to head, he's not a top 50 all time heavyweight, but he beat all comers including Jersey Joe Walcott, Archie Moore, and Ezzard Charles twice. That's enough to be recognized for.
Gene Tunney finished his career 65-1-1. He had a loss and a draw with Harry Greb, who is in his own rights an ATG. He beat Greb 3 times, by the way. He beat Dempsey twice when nobody thought anyone could do it.
Ali
Lennox Lewis
Larry Holmes
Oleksander Usyk
Vitali Klitschko
George Foreman
Jack Johnson
Rocky Marciano
Gene Tunney
Holyfield, Vlad, and Dempsey next three
Louis was dominant for a decade, and his only loses were to Schmeling (avenged), Ezzard Charles (one of the greatest light heavyweights ever), and Marciano when he was old.
Ali got gifted a lot of decisions, but he won the lineal 3 times. Can't take that away from him. The wins over Liston, Foreman and Frazier (although Frazier is overrated historically) is his legacy.
Lennox cleaned house in one of the best eras in heavyweight history and avenged both fluke losses. Dominated the other two best heavyweights of his era.
Larry Holmes owned the heavyweight division for 7 years. It wasn't the strongest era but Holmes fought all comers and won them all until Spinks, another of the light heavyweight ATGs.
Usyk has beaten the next three best heavyweights and did it decisively, all while giving up several inches and lots of pounds. Head to head, he's one of the greatest of all time. His motor, defensive skills, footwork, and handspeed are all at a level most heavyweights haven't seen and has enough power at 6'3" 220 lbs to be a champion in any era.
Vitali was untouchable after Lewis retired. Boring af to watch, but untouchable.
Foreman regaining the title in 1994 cemented his legacy. Before his comeback, he was like Tyson "he could have been so great if only he had a brain". The comeback showed he was a lot more than a puncher.
Jack Johnson revolutionized the sport. The color barrier is one thing, but Johnson's defensive prowess at the time was second to none. He started a new era when he beat Jeffries.
Marciano retiring undefeated is still a great accomplishment. Head to head, he's not a top 50 all time heavyweight, but he beat all comers including Jersey Joe Walcott, Archie Moore, and Ezzard Charles twice. That's enough to be recognized for.
Gene Tunney finished his career 65-1-1. He had a loss and a draw with Harry Greb, who is in his own rights an ATG. He beat Greb 3 times, by the way. He beat Dempsey twice when nobody thought anyone could do it.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 11:09 am to YouKnowImRight
Good take.
There’s been some excellent discussion about this, thank y’all.
There’s been some excellent discussion about this, thank y’all.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 2:32 pm to lsu777
How could you possibly think Tyson would have beaten Ali, Louis, Liston, Foreman, Holyfield, Lewis, etc.? Hell, Tunney would box his ears off.
Whipping a bunch of tomato cans is a far cry from whipping a real champion with boxing skills and no fear of his opponent.
Sorry but Tyson will always be the most overrated heavyweight in history by people who don't see his faults. He was the school yard bully who folded when challenged. I've never seen a list by any boxing historian that has him ranked high.
Whipping a bunch of tomato cans is a far cry from whipping a real champion with boxing skills and no fear of his opponent.
Sorry but Tyson will always be the most overrated heavyweight in history by people who don't see his faults. He was the school yard bully who folded when challenged. I've never seen a list by any boxing historian that has him ranked high.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 2:58 pm to prplhze2000
Dempsey is 12th on my list behind Holyfield, he's on the cusp of the top 10, I have the most enormous possible respect for him. I will say that he lost something when he got rich and famous and secure compared to when he was young and hungry and poor and liked to have killed Jess Willard to win the title.
This post was edited on 2/25/25 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 2/25/25 at 3:00 pm to JackDempsey
I don't disagree with a thing you've said about Tyson's faults ... but I still think that on a given night, and especially if he had Rooney and Atlas in his corner and was not left to his own devices, absolutely peak young and savage Tyson had the chops to beat anyone who's ever stepped in a ring.
That doesn't mean that he would. Big difference. Because he didn't maintain that for an extended period like the true greats of the division did.
That doesn't mean that he would. Big difference. Because he didn't maintain that for an extended period like the true greats of the division did.
This post was edited on 2/25/25 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 2/25/25 at 3:07 pm to prplhze2000
My second 10 is Holyfield, Dempsey, Bowe, Tunney, Wlad K., Langford, Charles, Wills, Schmeling and Patterson.
Posted on 2/25/25 at 3:08 pm to InkStainedWretch
Ring Magazine did the Top 50 heavyweights of the 20th century:
The list came out in the fall of 1999. Lennox Lewis was only ranked 33rd, at that point he was just had a draw with Holyfield. He hadn't yet beaten Holyfield, Tyson, Tua, Klischko.
quote:
1. Muhammad Ali
2. Joe Louis
3. Evander Holyfield
4. George Foreman
5. Larry Holmes
6. Rocky Marciano
7. Sonny Liston
8. Joe Frazier
9. Jack Johnson
10. Jack Dempsey
11. Ezzard Charles
12. James J. Jeffries
13. Jersey Joe Walcott
14. Mike Tyson
15. Gene Tunney
16. Harry Wills
17. Sam Langford
18. John L. Sullivan
19. Max Schmeling
20. Max Baer
21. Floyd Patterson
22. Ken Norton
23. Riddick Bowe
24. Bob Fitzsimmons
25. Joe Jeannette
The list came out in the fall of 1999. Lennox Lewis was only ranked 33rd, at that point he was just had a draw with Holyfield. He hadn't yet beaten Holyfield, Tyson, Tua, Klischko.
Popular
Back to top

1







