Started By
Message

re: Whitlock takes down ESPN’s Katie Nolan

Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:05 pm to
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15892 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Then that’s on ESPN. Good for her for capitalizing on the market for her.

I said the same thing earlier in the thread.
quote:

Maybe, but why? To what end? I like Whitlock a lot, but this seems pretty petty and completely unnecessary

I also addressed this earlier in the thread. It's not so much about her as it is about the hypocrisy of Nolan and her colleagues calling out "privilege" when she's become rich for not doing much of anything.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89845 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:13 pm to
I just became a Whitlock fan...
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110816 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

and her colleagues calling out "privilege" when she's become rich for not doing much of anything
But people don't realize the reality is that she doesn't get paid for being good at live TV or good at writing or anything, she gets paid based on her ability to get people to watch TV when she's on. And if she's getting paid $1 million then it would seem obvious that ESPN has done the market research and she Nets positive ratings. That's why she gets paid, the rest doesn't matter.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

But people don't realize the reality is that she doesn't get paid for being good at live TV or good at writing or anything, she gets paid based on her ability to get people to watch TV when she's on. And if she's getting paid $1 million then it would seem obvious that ESPN has done the market research and she Nets positive ratings. That's why she gets paid, the rest doesn't matter.



and she is not going to frick you for white knighting for her either
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110816 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

and she is not going to frick you for white knighting for her either
Will you keep whining about me posting facts?

Because you're whining about me posting facts.

Man up.
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15892 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

she gets paid based on her ability to get people to watch TV when she's on. And if she's getting paid $1 million then it would seem obvious that ESPN has done the market research and she Nets positive ratings.

Her show premiered on ESPN+ a year after she joined ESPN. Then it was moved to ESPN2 because it wasn't generating viewers or new subscribers.

Maybe the move to cable finally helped ratings, but she was making her money for a couple years without getting people to watch her on TV.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110816 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Her show premiered on ESPN+ a year after she joined ESPN. Then it was moved to ESPN2 because it wasn't generating viewers or new subscribers.

Just curious here, is ESPN+ really more coveted than ESPN 2?

I never would have guessed that.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70179 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 10:00 pm to
They have to fill hours on ESPN2. But she wasn’t moving the needle on the subscription service. People weren’t actively watching her. The move to cable seems like a test to see if people would watch her with a lower hurdle. I don’t think that happened either though.
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 11:23 pm to
Thats a fat, old jealous man on his way out
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66422 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 11:49 pm to
Surprised at the response on this board. Nolan has never bothered me ... in reality she’s pretty irrelevant.

Whitlock is just a jealous bitch because he’s not making close to 7 figures like Nolan.

I, for one, hate jealous people. Especially when they’re mad over an attractive female. Sorry Whitlock, you get more opportunities when you’re hot. It’s been that way since the beginning of time.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 12:28 am to
quote:

you get more opportunities when you’re hot. It’s been that way since the beginning of time.


Well, yeah

That is kind of the essence of what he wrote. Unless Nolan believes her sex appeal is something merit based then I don't see what factual rebuttal she can offer.

If she were smart enough to make her case I think that would be the best argument (my physical appeal does relate directly to my value as a broadcaster). But, in large part because she is not smart enough to make a meaningful rebuttal, Wllborn's dismissal of her as a lightweight has merit.

I am not a big Doug Gottleib fan for a few reasons but seeing an ugly guy being critical of a beautiful but debatable unqualified female broadcaster is interesting because that doesn't happen as often as it should when the person screwing up is beautiful. The "halo effect" of charisma is a disproportionate component of the broadcasting credentials of the less qualified television personalities.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164097 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 12:51 am to
quote:

Sorry Whitlock, you get more opportunities when you’re hot. It’s been that way since the beginning of time.

Settle down, bgwin. She’s way more cute than hot.
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11712 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 1:08 am to
Imagine wasting your life white knighting for a 6.5/10

Couldn't be me
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14793 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 4:10 am to
Whitlock and Travis are the last based national sports analysts
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
19817 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 5:07 am to
Truth hurts
Posted by GeauxWrek
Somewhere b/w Houston and BR
Member since Sep 2010
4293 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 5:44 am to
Where are all the pics?
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4466 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 6:21 am to
quote:

Where are all the pics?


I mean, if you insist.








This post was edited on 9/22/20 at 6:24 am
Posted by LSD Tiger
Member since Jun 2020
210 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:36 am to
Whitlock is a fricking idiot.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65055 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Whitlock is a fricking idiot.


Please tell me how he's an idiot in this particular case? He's not just calling out Katie Nolan because she's hot and rich. He's calling her out because she's hot and rich and has the nerve to speak out against white male privilege. She's just as privileged and thus a hypocrite.
Posted by ProfFrink
Springfield
Member since Nov 2018
3407 posts
Posted on 9/22/20 at 7:49 am to
quote:

He's calling her out because she's hot and rich and has the nerve to speak out against white male privilege. She's just as privileged and thus a hypocrite.


She never claimed she wasn’t privileged. In fact she admitted as such. Why can’t she speak about that?

She won awards before ESPN hired her.

Whitlock comes across as bitter and jealous because someone else is having success while he has been fired from every major network he has been on. Instead of owning up to his failures he has to blame someone else.

Now he is writing for a 3rd rate site while pandering to that audience. Whitlock is a joke where she has had multiple people take her back saying that she works hard at her job and is still employed by ESPN.
This post was edited on 9/22/20 at 7:54 am
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram