- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which SEC teams would win PAC championship?
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:37 pm to Vanilla Ice
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:37 pm to Vanilla Ice
We don't even know what teams are capable of winning the SEC yet. And I think there are about 4 teams who would have a chance to win the PAC champ.
I'd also say 2-3 teams would have a shot at the SEC champ from the PAC. Would they actually win it...probably not. But even Missouri had a shot last year (and still this year).
I'd also say 2-3 teams would have a shot at the SEC champ from the PAC. Would they actually win it...probably not. But even Missouri had a shot last year (and still this year).
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 9:39 pm
1
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:43 pm to Vanilla Ice
quote:
Stanford is bad. Oregon isn't very good. UCLA is not anywhere close to earning the preseason hype. Arizona State has never been a legit team. UTAH? Lol okay.
You are legit in your analysis. Here is mine:
1) LSU sucks
2) Bama Is overrated
3) Ole Miss is soft
4) A&M well do I need say more
5) Auburn see #4
6) Miss State will fall
7) Bert is fat
Great fricking analysis, amirite?
This post was edited on 11/11/14 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:46 pm to bisonduck
LSU would have had no shot this season.
If you look at us exclusively over the last month, maybe.
We'd probably finish with 2-3 losses
If you look at us exclusively over the last month, maybe.
We'd probably finish with 2-3 losses
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:47 pm to Pedro
quote:This. Sometimes living among the retarded rednecks is frustrating
MSU and Bama, maybe
the PAC is legit. this SEC homerism shite is fricking retarded.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:48 pm to TigerBait1127
No shot in hell LSU loses more than 1 game in the PAC the way the D has been playing. No shot.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:50 pm to Vanilla Ice
quote:
No shot in hell LSU loses more than 1 game in the PAC the way the D has been playing. No shot.
If you can't score in the Pac-10, you can get easily outscored on a bad day.
LSU would lose 2-3 in the Pac.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 9:51 pm to Vanilla Ice
quote:if we played Oregon, ASU, Ucla, arizona, or maybe even USC early in the year we would have been fricked
No shot in hell LSU loses more than 1 game in the PAC the way the D has been playing. No shot.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:04 pm to Vanilla Ice
Lsu was run off the field in their two losses. The defense has not been 85 bears like.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:26 pm to LittleRockHog501
The thing that most people fail to realize and really try to point the finger at Oregon losing back to back games 3 years ago to SEC teams is that the SEC teams had ALOT of time to scheme and rest their players in preparation for Oregon. Playing week to week in the PAC12, with a week to prepare, I'd imagine that the Bama's, MSU, LSU's of the world would be about where they are now record wise. If you put Oregon in the SEC right now, they'd maybe have 2 losses. This year I'd say Bama and MSU could win the PAC12. LSU would get blown out with their lack of offense and Les's questionable coaching decisions.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:44 pm to wickedretro
Oregon's offense is built way better to face a strong defense and our defense is really good at stopping ground and pound teams. Our front seven outweighs 2011 by significant margin. We can play in a box but spread us and we are butter.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 11:08 pm to wickedretro
Haters always say that LSU would get blown out, but rarely has it happened outside of a small handful of conference tilts.
I don't think LSU is consistent enough to win the PAC12, but blown out? No
I don't think LSU is consistent enough to win the PAC12, but blown out? No
Posted on 11/11/14 at 11:26 pm to TexasTiger6777
LSU's ball control offense doesn't allow for blow outs.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 1:18 am to bisonduck
Having watched almost every LSU and Stanford game this year, I would say that LSU is a slightly better version of Stanford. Strong defenses but weak offenses.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 1:27 am to Vanilla Ice
Alabama favored to win it over Oregon
Mississippi State even with Oregon
Maybe Auburn but they would be in big trouble on D - around even with Oregon
Dark horses
The way LSU is playing of late they could but their early season for probably would have done them in
Ole Miss would have a shot
Georgia would be a dark horse with Gurley. He would run wild on pac Ds but Oregon O would prison rape UGA D.
Mississippi State even with Oregon
Maybe Auburn but they would be in big trouble on D - around even with Oregon
Dark horses
The way LSU is playing of late they could but their early season for probably would have done them in
Ole Miss would have a shot
Georgia would be a dark horse with Gurley. He would run wild on pac Ds but Oregon O would prison rape UGA D.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 2:42 am to Vanilla Ice
quote:
No shot in hell LSU loses more than 1 game in the PAC the way the D has been playing. No shot.
You didn't read what I posted correctly.
LSU now would be tough to beat.
But if you take LSU's whole season, I think we lose more than 1 easily
Posted on 11/12/14 at 6:16 am to marchballer
quote:
Having watched almost every LSU and Stanford game this year, I would say that LSU is a slightly better version of Stanford. Strong defenses but weak offenses.
eh. Vice versa I think. Stanford would be favored over LSU on a neutral field.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 6:17 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
LSU now would be tough to beat.
Except for powerhouses like Arkansas who is favored over LSU this weekend. But they sure would be a tough out for a second-rate team like Oregon.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:02 am to GeauxTigersLee
quote:
even Missouri had a shot last year
This and A&M alone prove that just because you play in the mighty SEC doesn't mean you are a top 10 team. Yes they usually have one of the two best teams in the country but the whole conference (even the west) isn't a semi-pro league like people in this area tend to think.
A&M and Mizzou came in to the SEC and everyone thought they because came from a different conference they would be doormats in the SEC (especially Mizzou)....and wtf happened. Mizzou nearly went to a nation championship and A&M nearly beat everyone they played.
It's ridiculous and ignorant to think that more than 1-3 SEC teams would compete for the PAC championship and no one from the PAC could compete in the SEC.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:30 am to Throbinhood
I think what this thread shows more than anything is that PAC 12 and SEC need more bowl tie ins.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:38 am to Vanilla Ice
quote:Defense practically has no margin for error in games against oregon, and other high powered offenses.
No shot in hell LSU loses more than 1 game in the PAC the way the D has been playing. No shot.
Do I think LSU could shut them down enough? Yeah, but the offense still would have to score 24+ to win. That would be an offensive explosion for LSU.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News