Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 7/5/17 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

While 3 years from now, your ceiling is an A with Hayward.
I would say the ceiling is higher, but it's hard to predict that far out with a player like IT being so good offensively and so terrible defensively. Although that could get worked out too. And Horford will be 33 and commanding 30 million in 3 seasons so that may be an issue too.
quote:

The benefit of having him now is that you develop a chemistry with IT, Bradley, Brown/Tatum, Hayward, Horford to contend
Sure, but again Brown/Tatum are the keys because Horford, IT, and Hayward are likely to be on the backside of their peak, although Hayward may still have a year or two more.
quote:

Its a move to contend in 2019 or 2020, it isn't for now.
That just seems like a lot of money for are fringe all star player, especially since they could have gotten better players in George and especially Butler.

Again, maybe it's my bias getting in the way because I don't like Boston, but I think Hayward went from underrated to overrated without playing a single game since it was the offseason.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 10:07 pm
Posted by braud2go
Member since Nov 2010
986 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 10:21 pm to
Again, I see what you're getting at but I just disagree. He's gunna benefit a lot going from the west to the east. Also, if Otto Porter is given the max this week Hayward is in no way overrated.

I'm not a Boston fan either but they have probably the second best SF in the east now in league driven by wing players.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

I'm not a Boston fan either but they have probably the second best SF in the east now
I would say 3rd, clearly behind LeBron and Giannis.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63365 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 10:37 pm to
Giannis isn't really a SF
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Giannis isn't really a SF
According to basketball reference they estimated he played 65% of his minutes at SF this past season. Since he's entered the league he's played 11% at PG, 26% at SG, 43% at SF, and 20% at PF.

He's obviously versatile, but I don't know how you could consider him anything other than a SF.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32253 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 10:56 pm to
Giannis is a phenom, I'd say he might be the 2nd best player in the East.

For comparison sake:
Giannis @ 22
52.1/27.2/77.0, TS% 59.9
22.9 PPG, 8.8 RPG, 5.4 APG, 1.6 SPG, 1.9 BPG, 2.9 TOV
26.1 PER, .210 WS/48, 7.6 BPM, 6.9 VORP

LeBron @ 22
47.6/31.9/69.8, TS% 55.2
27.3 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 6.0 APG, 1.6 SPG, 0.7 BPG, 3.2 TOV
24.5 PER, 0.232 WS/48, 7.4 BPM, 7.6 VORP

Crazy thing is, advanced stats favor LeBron at 21.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5037 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

buckeye_vol

You're getting tunnel vision with numbers. Crowder did what the system asked him to do and he did it well. He made open threes and played good defense. He was never asked to create his own shots or create shots for others, while that's largely what Hayward was tasked with doing. When you have multiple guys who can both create for themselves AND set up others it makes it that much tougher on a defense. Also, Hayward isn't really that much worse than Crowder defensively. And you kinda cherry picked those stats.

Conclusion: Your bias is showing.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 12:36 am to
quote:

He was never asked to create his own shots or create shots for others, while that's largely what Hayward was tasked with doing. When you have multiple guys who can both create for themselves AND set up others it makes it that much tougher on a defense.
I agree that they should improve offensively.
quote:

Hayward isn't really that much worse than Crowder defensively.
See this I'm not sure about. Hayward was an average defender on a great defensive team with the best rim protector in the league. Now he'll join one of the worst defenders (IT) in the league sans the rim protection.
quote:

And you kinda cherry picked those stats.
I didn't cherry pick. I used the composite plus minus statistics, and on-off statistics. Obviously the playoff sample size was limited, but I thought it was telling that Hayward was -10 against the Clippers, especially since Griffin missed a lot of the series.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5037 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:06 am to
You showed a few stats that showed Hayward was only slightly better than Crowder. There are many that show that Hayward is a lot better than Crowder.

PER:
Hayward: 22.2 - All star level
Crowder: 14.9 - Slightly Above Average

Win Shares:
Hayward: 10.4
Crowder: 6.7

Wins Above Replacement Level Player:
Hayward: 10.8
Crowder: 5.7

Estimated Wins Added:
Hayward: 14.7
Crowder: 5.2

Hayward alone doesn't push them over the top, but it gets them closer. They still have a ton of assets and their chances only get better as LeBron ages and GS goes deep into the tax.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36993 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 7:26 am to
quote:

That just seems like a lot of money for are fringe all star player, especially since they could have gotten better players in George and especially Butler.

They had to give up assets for those players. The choice wasn't Hayward or George or Butler. They wanted two of those 3, it just didn't work out.

Their biggest mistake was trading away the Fultz pick, IMO. They need a contingency plan for IT.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27983 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:32 am to
Carmelo Anthony was spotted on a flight to Houston. What does it all mean?

Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59893 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:35 am to
To piggy back on that, meta world peace spotted in New Orleans.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116124 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:38 am to
Wasn't that pic from a couple years ago before he resigned with the knicks?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36993 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:38 am to
The tattoos on that wall sticker are horrendous

I'm pretty sure that's not what his arm looks like.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27983 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:39 am to
Yeah
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36993 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Wasn't that pic from a couple years ago before he resigned with the knicks?

Yes, the pic placed in this thread was obviously a joke
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116124 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:40 am to
Yeah I figured but I was trying to remember where I had seen that before
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112823 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 9:58 am to
quote:

I didn't cherry pick. I used the composite plus minus statistics, and on-off statistics
Not sure how fair that comparison is for a really good player compared to a role player. Reason being, Crowder played roughly 75-80% of his minutes with IT4 and Horford on the court, so it'll skew when the role player is playing with better players IMO.

Not to mention, those numbers can show serious anomalies. For example, if you use ON/OFF for IT4 on defense, you'd see that the team is exactly the same with him on vs off in the regular season, and the defense actually got worse when he was off the court in the playoffs. Can we use that to deduce IT4 is NOT a bad defender? Of course not.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Not sure how fair that comparison is for a really good player compared to a role player. Reason being, Crowder played roughly 75-80% of his minutes with IT4 and Horford on the court, so it'll skew when the role player is playing with better players IMO.
Of course, but on the flip side Hayward played 86% of his minutes with Gobert.
quote:

For example, if you use ON/OFF for IT4 on defense, you'd see that the team is exactly the same with him on vs off
What? IT 2016-2017 on-off

During the regular season, the Celtics had a defensive rating of 112 with IT on the court, and 102.3 with IT off the court. Their defense was 9.7 points better when he was off the court.
quote:

and the defense actually got worse when he was off the court in the playoffs.
Again. They were better with him off the court, although it was small (0.6 points) but that is likely due to the fact he missed most of the Cavs series.
quote:

Can we use that to deduce IT4 is NOT a bad defender? Of course not.
Well since the only logical deduction from that data is that he is a bad defender, then of course we can't make the illogical deduction that has no basis. I don't know what you were looking at.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 10:55 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112823 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Of course, but on the flip side Hayward played 86% of his minutes with Gobert.

Right, but Gobert is good, and so is Hayward. Crowder is not good like Horford or IT4. That's where the discrepancy comes in where it's not really an apples and apples comparison IMO.

quote:

What? IT 2016-2017 on-off

During the regular season, the Celtics had a defensive rating of 112 with IT on the court, and 102.3 with IT off the court. Their defense was 9.7 points better when he was off the court.
Yea never mind, I was looking at it across instead of up and down.

I still stand by my original premise, that was just a bad example lol.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 10:59 am
Jump to page
Page First 102 103 104 105 106 ... 171
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 104 of 171Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram