- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The refs did NOT hand Texas that W
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:53 pm to JakeFromStateFarm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:53 pm to JakeFromStateFarm
quote:
So players can blatantly target as long as it’s at the end of close games because “nobody wants it to end on a dumb penalty”. Got it.
It wasn't blatant
3
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:53 pm to 11
quote:
Neither should be targeting, both are classic american football plays
I’d agree, if this was 1983.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:57 pm to 11
It was blatant. It wasn’t the most aggressive, but it met every single stipulation for targeting. It was textbook targeting. It was most certainly a blatant act of targeting.
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:07 pm to 11
quote:
You can't make targeting calls in situations like that
Dumbasses really coming out today
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:01 pm to SelaTiger
quote:
It was blatant.
So says the Longhorn fan with the Matthew McConaghy tattoo on his arse cheek
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:01 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
lol. Helmet to helmet on a defenseless receiver that resulted in a concussion. Equally as bad as the no call when Mingo KO’d Harrison a few years ago
The NCAA cares about player safety, until a Tier 1 media darling needs a game rigged. Then frick your concussed player.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:05 pm to 11
That was textbook targeting. The worst part for me wasn't that it wasn't called. It was that it wasn't called AFTER reviewing the play. Not sure how you come away from that not wondering whether these games are rigged
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:33 pm to 11
Lol. Guess refs aren't the only ones who are stupid.......
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:40 pm to 11
Regardless of if that play was or wasn’t, it’s not a stupid rule and you most definitely can call it when it’s warranted regardless of the situation during the game.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:42 pm to 11
quote:
It wasn't blatant
Lol
Posted on 1/1/25 at 7:59 pm to 11
quote:
You can't make targeting calls in situations like that, it's a stupid rule and every fan should be against it.
ASU played without a DB for the first half who CLEARLY made a difference the whole first half. If you’re not going to call THAT targeting, eliminate the rule. It’s a waste of time. That was targeting 150 times out of 10
Posted on 1/1/25 at 8:15 pm to 11
quote:Why is this being downvoted so heavily?
Neither should be targeting, both are classic american football plays, the defender meant no harm on either hit.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 8:16 pm to 11
Refs did not, but the replay official sure did.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 3:59 pm to 11
Bless your heart. Hopefully you gain some understanding of the rules soon.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 4:16 pm to High C
It’s even worse because ASUs best defensive player wasn’t allowed to play in the first half of the game because of a “targeting” on essentially the same play in their conf championship game
Posted on 1/3/25 at 4:29 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Neither should be targeting, both are classic american football plays, the defender meant no harm on either hit.
quote:
Why is this being downvoted so heavily?
Because he's a moron.
Because the leadership has determined that calls should be enforced only when it benefits the bottom line.
In this case handing Texas the chance to win it in regulation, otherwise Skattebo would have bulldozed forward and run the clock out, Arizona State hopefully makes the field goal and the cinderella moves on to the next round. It was a disgusting, blatant attempt to subvert the integrity of the game in the name of making sure their guy got in
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 1/3/25 at 4:44 pm to Underwood
quote:
Because he's a moron.
Because the leadership has determined that calls should be enforced only when it benefits the bottom line.
In this case handing Texas the chance to win it in regulation, otherwise Skattebo would have bulldozed forward and run the clock out, Arizona State hopefully makes the field goal and the cinderella moves on to the next round. It was a disgusting, blatant attempt to subvert the integrity of the game in the name of making sure their guy got in
ASU is on their 3rd kicker this season. Better chance he misses the potential kick. And if the refs were looking out for Texas, then why did they call pass interference and defensive holding (both in the end zone) on ASU's game-tying TD drive? All ASU had to do was stop Texas on 4th and 15.
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 1/3/25 at 4:53 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
ASU is on their 3rd kicker this season. Better chance he misses the potential kick.
If Carrot Top doesn’t miss so many kicks for Texas, they might not have needed the non-call. You can rationalize all you want, it was targeting.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News