Started By
Message
locked post

The difference between the Astros and top contenders

Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:53 pm
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138531 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:53 pm
Astros make any talk for Bregman a non-starter

Red Sox see who they want in a front line starter and do not let anything stop them, even giving up THE TOP PROSPECT in baseball
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
24997 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:54 pm to
the red sox are in a better position to go for it right now


/thread
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
13022 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:55 pm to
I remember almost this exact thread when the Angels signed Pujols and Hamilton.
Posted by LandonC
Member since Oct 2016
599 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:55 pm to
Red Sox wouldn't give up benitendi
Posted by Broseph Barksdale
Member since Sep 2010
10571 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:55 pm to
Not sure it's a Sox/Stros thing. DD is infamous for selling prospects for superstars. Lots of good GM's wouldn't have done it.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63399 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:56 pm to
Like how the Nats wouldn't give up Trea Turner this year

Or the Cubs wouldn't give up Schwarber last year
Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
3193 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:56 pm to
Red Sox paid $38M this year for Sale and gave up the 2 best minor league prospects in the game. Not to mention the other prospects they had to give up.

Sale was too much for the Astros. So is Chris Archer. The Astros will slug their way to 95 wins with the current pitching they have now.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:57 pm to
One is not like the other
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150133 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:59 pm to
And the red Sox are in a much better position to give up Moncada then anyone else would. What's your point
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56303 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:00 pm to
Stupid comparison given the Sox have an infinite payroll.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62693 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:02 pm to
I may be wrong about this--and I hope I am--but I didn't think Bregs was worthy of the 2nd pick, and think he'll come back down to earth a bit. I may would trade him to win now. To me, he's ways just struck me as a high floor, but relatively low ceiling guy. Like I think Pedroia is his absolute max. Which is fantastic. But I wouldn't consider him untouchable if you feel you have all the pieces besides a starter to win now.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150133 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:03 pm to
And you can also add the dodgers because we weren't giving up urias
Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
3193 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:07 pm to
I thought the same thing until he adjusted to the show. He is very good. All-star level defensively and a very good bat. He will likely have a down year this season but he showed enough.

There is no way I would have traded Bregman unless it was straight up for a Sale or Archer.
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
13022 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

One is not like the other



Umm, the purpose of this thread and the purpose of the "lets all laugh at the Astros for not signing Pujols " threads are absolutely identical.

Troll gonna troll.

This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 5:12 pm
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
84302 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

To me, he's ways just struck me as a high floor, but relatively low ceiling guy. Like I think Pedroia is his absolute max. Which is fantastic. But I wouldn't consider him untouchable if you feel you have all the pieces besides a starter to win now.


He changed his swing, approach and body (added 20 pounds of muscle) to adjust to professional baseball. Mainieri wanted him to hit line drives and ground balls due to the dead bats of college ball. Bregman now profiles as a bat good enough for third base. Ceiling is higher than Pedroia.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28017 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:11 pm to
Wrong. Good GM's know their price and won't cross that line.

It's easy to just give up your best prospects for big-name players. It takes discipline to know when to say no.

Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26376 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:12 pm to
I'd give up Bregman now for a Number 3 starter

He sucks and will bust out. Overrated
Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
3193 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:12 pm to
The kid the Red Sox gave up was better than Perdroia.
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9136 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:13 pm to
You only trade prospects when you are 1 piece away. Trading prospects any sooner is a good way to be dwelling in mediocrity in 3 years time.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63399 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

He sucks and will bust out. Overrated




Might as well get the plaque ready
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram