- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:14 am to sjmabry
quote:
Shaq is insecure
About what? Being one of the best centers/players of all time?
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:19 am to Weagle25
The show ends when the season ends
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:20 am to whoisnickdoobs
I have no doubt Shaq is insecure like most of these athletes are insecure.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:22 am to athenslife101
OP thread title is dog shite.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:28 am to whoisnickdoobs
quote:
Shaq is insecure
quote:Because he cannot have a debate with Charles without using his championship rings to validate his points.
About what? Being one of the best centers/players of all time?
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:32 am to sjmabry
quote:
Because he cannot have a debate with Charles without using his championship rings to validate his points.
That doesn't make you insecure, just kinda cocky. He was right in the argument with or without any rings. I think he just likes F-ing with Charles.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:34 am to sjmabry
Chuck's assertion is that THE star player and the head coach must be on the same page.
Shaq's only counter is that is not true because he and Pat Riley did not get along.
Well, Shaq ... you were not THE star player on that team. D-Wade was....I do not see how anyone who actually was alive and watched at the time would challenge this.
So ... basically, Shaq's example is toast at that point.
I do agree with Shaq that players should not be coddled ... but, that's just kinda funny ... coming from Shaq.
Inside the NBA would be just fine without Shaq ... in fact, it WAS just fine before he ever got there.
The show would SUCK without Sir Charles.
So ... STFU Shaq ... just sit there and be Shaqacatatonic like you did the other night.
Quit shaqtin a foo'
Shaq's only counter is that is not true because he and Pat Riley did not get along.
Well, Shaq ... you were not THE star player on that team. D-Wade was....I do not see how anyone who actually was alive and watched at the time would challenge this.
So ... basically, Shaq's example is toast at that point.
I do agree with Shaq that players should not be coddled ... but, that's just kinda funny ... coming from Shaq.
Inside the NBA would be just fine without Shaq ... in fact, it WAS just fine before he ever got there.
The show would SUCK without Sir Charles.
So ... STFU Shaq ... just sit there and be Shaqacatatonic like you did the other night.
Quit shaqtin a foo'
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:41 am to whoisnickdoobs
quote:Your opinion, just like Charles told Shaq.
He was right in the argument with or without any rings
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:57 am to athenslife101
quote:
The show ends when the season ends
Oh. I read it as the show was for real ending.
Had a minor heart attack
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 11:58 am
Posted on 5/9/18 at 11:58 am to Weagle25
Where was Ernie?
Posted on 5/9/18 at 12:01 pm to whoisnickdoobs
quote:
That doesn't make you insecure, just kinda cocky. He was right in the argument with or without any rings. I think he just likes F-ing with Charles.
My guess is this is the first time you’ve seen Shaq in an argument.
In a vacuum, his use of the rings in this argument is okay because at least it’s sort of relevant. However, in the past every time he gets in argument with Chuck he goes straight to the rings even when it’s completely irrelevant to his point.
He’s definitely insecure even though he has no reason to be.
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 5/9/18 at 12:03 pm to navy
quote:
Well, Shaq ... you were not THE star player on that team. D-Wade was....I do not see how anyone who actually was alive and watched at the time would challenge this.
So ... basically, Shaq's example is toast at that point.
While this is all true, I guarantee Shaq does not see himself as the second guy on that Heat team
Posted on 5/9/18 at 12:13 pm to navy
quote:
Chuck's assertion is that THE star player and the head coach must be on the same page.
Shaq's only counter is that is not true because he and Pat Riley did not get along.
Well, Shaq ... you were not THE star player on that team. D-Wade was....I do not see how anyone who actually was alive and watched at the time would challenge this.
So ... basically, Shaq's example is toast at that point.
I do agree with Shaq that players should not be coddled ... but, that's just kinda funny ... coming from Shaq.
Inside the NBA would be just fine without Shaq ... in fact, it WAS just fine before he ever got there.
The show would SUCK without Sir Charle
upvote.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 2:17 pm to navy
Anyone fair and unbiased can see that shaq was out of line in this debate. And as many have brought up, in other debates he engages in.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 3:47 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Then holds up a picture of KD.
That he used as a stencil to tag racist graffiti on his own house to deflect from his performance....
Posted on 5/9/18 at 5:23 pm to shel311
Barkley was a great player. Anyone who says otherwise is ignorant.
Shaq was even better.
Shaq was even better.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:27 pm to WildcatMike
Shaq is a douche. They aren't playing anymore, they are analysts. Talking about your rings means nothing when talking about the Raptors vs Cavs like Charles was trying to do before Shaq just yelled over him and he never got his point across. It's all he can ever say to Chuck and it gets old.
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:29 pm to whoisnickdoobs
quote:
bout what? Being one of the best centers/players of all time?
He is an analyst now. Not a center.
This post was edited on 5/9/18 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 5/9/18 at 7:40 pm to navy
quote:
Chuck's assertion is that THE star player and the head coach must be on the same page.
Shaq's only counter is that is not true because he and Pat Riley did not get along.
Well, Shaq ... you were not THE star player on that team. D-Wade was....I do not see how anyone who actually was alive and watched at the time would challenge this.
So ... basically, Shaq's example is toast at that point.
I do agree with Shaq that players should not be coddled ... but, that's just kinda funny ... coming from Shaq.
Inside the NBA would be just fine without Shaq ... in fact, it WAS just fine before he ever got there.
The show would SUCK without Sir Charles.
Nothing more need be said.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News