- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stanford at Washington
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:27 pm to LSUintheNW
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:27 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
You're hilarious and such full of hate that you can't be realistic.
Andruw Luck is gone!Stanford hasn't exactly been impressive have they? If I think USC is overrated then wouldn't I think Stanford is also?
quote:
don't think you realize how bad this udub team is. But you know all about the PAC
I will admit it if I am wrong. It has nothing to do with hate. I believe Washinton has a great chance of winning/giving Stanford all they want.
I think LSU is that good and judging Washington on the LSU game isn't fair. Oregon is a great team and LSU dominated them at a neutral site.
2
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:29 pm to Topwater Trout
This game just has that upset feeling i have at least once a year on Thursday night games!
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:32 pm to au21tigers
I feel the same. But he gets butthurt b/c I don't think the PAC 12 is good. A few weeks ago they had built up ASU, UCLA, aqnd Arizona as being really good teams...what happened to them 
This post was edited on 9/27/12 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:44 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Andrew Luck is gone
Yep, but they have the lines to beat on udubs weakest part of their team.....the lines. Udub lost their 4th O lineman and only their center has any real experience. Stanford has had over 1000 yards rushing the last 3 years against them. It'll be closer because Luck is gone and Shaw isn't going to crush his QB's confidence by having him do to much. I think udub might even cover. Think of it like LSU at Auburn. New QB making his first start on the road in conference. Doesn't mean Udub is better than we thought (auburn) or that Stanford is worse than we thought (LSU). Although I will say I don't think Stanford is a top ten team. Not a good matchup for udub, plain and simple regardless of where the game is played.
quote:
I will admit it if I am wrong
Can't wait! Of course with my luck udub pulls off a miracle.
if so I'll be having a poster come calling and wanting to give me some funky avi. Also....I doubt auburn can beat Zona. (read your post on the rant). Although I think it's pretty even. Home team probably wins.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:51 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
I feel the same. But he gets butthurt b/c I don't think the PAC 12 is good. A few weeks ago they had built up ASU, UCLA, aqnd Arizona as being really good teams...what happened to them
I don't get mad dude. Don't really care that you want to be so unrealistic and say the shite you do. If you want to think that every team in the sec can beat any PAC team that's your problem.
I know you aren't saying I said all those teams are really good. If you want to be a douche and put words in people's mouth then whatever. Although a link is in order if you want to spout off. I did say those teams have improved from last year, save ASU. Hadn't seen enough of them to say.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:57 pm to OneMoreTime
You're picking road favorites in a conference game.... another sucker born everyday
Posted on 9/27/12 at 3:59 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
I don't get mad dude.
You seem to get mad. Last week you started shite. I have an opinion on how good the PAC 12 conference is. It has been formed over the past 4-5 years. If they show me they are better I will be the first to admit they are. Beating Big 10 schools isn't a big deal.
I am not sure who disputed my claim but I said the top 5 sec teams would pretty much go 4-1 vs top 5 PAC 12 teams....Which after last w/e that claim looks more like 5-0.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:09 pm to Topwater Trout
I bet you read too much into text messages too. Can you feel emotion through a message? seem is the key word, not going to let someone with a jaded view get me riled up no matter how stupid the shite you say.
The past few years has been admittedly not very good except a couple of teams. They're not the only conference to do that though. If you think they suck so bad then you shouldn't have a good view on any other conference, except the sec, as well.
Wasn't me, not going to waste my time with that ish. You can't just look at teams and say A should beat B. unless we're talking about a couple of teams. I need to see it.
Eta...surprise you only say that about the PAC. At least they'd make it closer than any other conference IMO, or do you not say it about others cause of your hate? I never see you dog any other conference like you do the PAC. Accident....I think not.
seem is the key word, not going to let someone with a jaded view get me riled up no matter how stupid the shite you say. The past few years has been admittedly not very good except a couple of teams. They're not the only conference to do that though. If you think they suck so bad then you shouldn't have a good view on any other conference, except the sec, as well.
quote:
I am not sure who disputed my claim but I said the top 5 sec teams would pretty much go 4-1 vs top 5 PAC 12 teams....Which after last w/e that claim looks more like 5-0.
Wasn't me, not going to waste my time with that ish. You can't just look at teams and say A should beat B. unless we're talking about a couple of teams. I need to see it.
Eta...surprise you only say that about the PAC. At least they'd make it closer than any other conference IMO, or do you not say it about others cause of your hate? I never see you dog any other conference like you do the PAC. Accident....I think not.
This post was edited on 9/27/12 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:11 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
We'll work on awesome. Haven't hit awesome yet. But we haven't hit medicre either.
What would you call a 3-4 loss team?
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:14 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
not going to let someone with a jaded view get me riled up no matter how stupid the shite you say.
This is where my issue is though. I am all about having a rational discussion. I have given reasons why I think the PAC 12 is a weak conference. It isn't as if I am forming conclusions without any basis. If Stanford dominates Washington i will believe they are a good team and the PAC 12 is better than I thought....but if Washington beats Stanford(you are saying Udub sucks and stanford will crush them) are you going to admit the PAC 12 is weak?
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:18 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
I never see you dog any other conference like you do the PAC. Accident....I think not.
Do we need to dog the ACC, Big10, and Big east? I don't hear anyone saying they are as good as the SEC from top to bottom. PAC 12 vs. SEC is what is getting compared in the media so far this year...correct?
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:19 pm to LSUJuice
quote:If only one of those existed...
I think we should have a thread strictly dedicated to college football bets.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:19 pm to au21tigers
betting the home dog on thursday nights is how the Biljs bought back the Podnuhs franchise
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:29 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
This is where my issue is though. I am all about having a rational discussion. I have given reasons why I think the PAC 12 is a weak conference. It isn't as if I am forming conclusions without any basis. If Stanford dominates Washington i will believe they are a good team and the PAC 12 is better than I thought....but if Washington beats Stanford(you are saying Udub sucks and stanford will crush them) are you going to admit the PAC 12 is weak?
Sweet......ok, by what you state are saying that LSU isn't a good team due to their past game against Auburn or are you now saying Auburn is one of the top teams in the SEC?
You have said previously in a different thread that conference games are a different animal. So, why is it different for the PAC?
Why does Stanford have to crush them to prove anything? If they go on to lose two games do they all of a sudden suck because they were close? Also, I never said Stanford will crush. Have said in both threads I believe it'll be closer than years past and udub may even cover. Stanford has a QB playing in his first road game in conference and udub is sick and tired of getting their asses kicked by them. Sark said they've had their most physical week of practice this year. You should really pay more attention and try to comprehend what I ACTUALLY say. Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:34 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Do we need to dog the ACC, Big10, and Big east? I don't hear anyone saying they are as good as the SEC from top to bottom. PAC 12 vs. SEC is what is getting compared in the media so far this year...correct?
You forgot the big 2. My statement wasn't about just this season. I've read the same crap from you solely about the PAC since you've been a member here.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:44 pm to Imnotagoogan41
I really hope washington beats them. It will make lsu look that much better
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:50 pm to LSUintheNW
Comparing LSU's victory over Udub at home to how Stanford will fare up in Washington in a conference game is retarded if that's how you are going to judge the Pac 12.
First not only is LSU probably the second-best team in the SEC...they're probably the second-best team in the nation and probably far better than any other SEC besides Bama.
The majority of the SEC is weak this year outside of the Top two juggernauts. (jury is still out on UGA and South Carolina.) The Pac 12 will be interesting with more competitive teams than originally thought. Oregon, USC, Oregon State, Stanford, UCLA, ASU and even Zona and Cal (which almost beat Ohio State on the road) are no gimmies.
But I give UW a shot tonight at home - not because I think the Pac is weak...contrary...it's competitive. Stanford isn't a Top 2 team like LSU and no one believes they are...they beat a severely undermanned on the O-line USC team at home where Barkley looked like shite...and USC was frankly overrated at #2.
But I know this board will not only use transitive property if UW beats Stanford but claim a victory for the entire SEC - old trick...bootsrap the entire conference on the backs of two top teams.
First not only is LSU probably the second-best team in the SEC...they're probably the second-best team in the nation and probably far better than any other SEC besides Bama.
The majority of the SEC is weak this year outside of the Top two juggernauts. (jury is still out on UGA and South Carolina.) The Pac 12 will be interesting with more competitive teams than originally thought. Oregon, USC, Oregon State, Stanford, UCLA, ASU and even Zona and Cal (which almost beat Ohio State on the road) are no gimmies.
But I give UW a shot tonight at home - not because I think the Pac is weak...contrary...it's competitive. Stanford isn't a Top 2 team like LSU and no one believes they are...they beat a severely undermanned on the O-line USC team at home where Barkley looked like shite...and USC was frankly overrated at #2.
But I know this board will not only use transitive property if UW beats Stanford but claim a victory for the entire SEC - old trick...bootsrap the entire conference on the backs of two top teams.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:54 pm to Burt Reynolds
As a Duck fan I hope udub gets crushed. As an LSU fan I hope the O line blocks better, WR's catch the ball and more importantly we get some outside the box offensive planning by the coaches.....THAT would make us look better. LSU doesn't need udub to win to make them look better. We need to prove the past few offensive seasons aren't the norm which I'm very nervous that it is going to be that way. I'm positive it'll get better but Miles offensive mind really makes me wonder.
I always wonder what it'd be like having Chip Kelly running the offense while Chavis runs the defense. Probably unstoppable.
:done dreaming:
I always wonder what it'd be like having Chip Kelly running the offense while Chavis runs the defense. Probably unstoppable.
:done dreaming:
Posted on 9/27/12 at 4:58 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Comparing LSU's victory over Udub at home to how Stanford will fare up in Washington in a conference game is retarded if that's how you are going to judge the Pac 12.
Sounds like that's his plan even though he's stated before that in conference games are a different animal. I guess that only works for the SEC.
Still waiting for his comeback. He set him self up pretty good. Not surprised he hasn't responded yet.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 5:50 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
You're picking road favorites in a conference game.... another sucker born everyday
Exactly.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News