- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC and Big East tied for #1 in current bowl standings
Posted on 12/28/09 at 6:05 pm to Guster
Posted on 12/28/09 at 6:05 pm to Guster
quote:hmmmmmmmmmmmm
.e. Pitt had a 9 - 3 record with one of their wins coming against youngstown ST. UNC has a record of 8-4 with two of their wins coming against FCS teams (citadel, and Georgia southern).
If you include them, you give the bowl a value of 17 points, otherwise if you don't, the bowl values at 14 points.
excellent point,, my initial thought is to exclude those wins,, but lets make this a collaborative effort
what do y'all think?
This post was edited on 12/28/09 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 12/28/09 at 6:54 pm to OWLFAN86
This is f-ing retarded; if the Big X can go 7-0 and not finish as the best conference this thing is fricked up
Posted on 12/28/09 at 6:57 pm to Buckeye06
i think if they were to go undefeated they would win,, unless another conference also went undefeated and scored more points
Posted on 12/28/09 at 6:58 pm to OWLFAN86
My main problem with rewarding more bowl teams is the size of the conference. The SEC starts way above the Pac-10 cause it may be impossible for all the teams to make bowl games in the P-10, so his system gives the SEC, ACC, and Big XII advantages
Posted on 12/28/09 at 7:01 pm to Buckeye06
quote:the OP's formula did that,,
My main problem with rewarding more bowl teams is the size of the conference. The SEC starts way above the Pac-10 cause it may be impossible for all the teams to make bowl games in the P-10, so his system gives the SEC, ACC, and Big XII advantages
your gripe is with the bowl system that has the tie -ins,,
im just trying to come up with a way to gauge what confernce has the best bowl season,, just win percentage alone isnt enough IMO
Posted on 12/28/09 at 7:23 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
what do y'all think?
I thought it about it some. I might go through later tonight and see how many teams it actually affects.
But I was thinking that since for bowl eligibility they allow one FCS win to count towards it, then you should limit the reward for the bowl game to one FCS win each. So in the case of UNC, their win count would e decreased by one, thus the bowl would reward one point less.
But like I said I would have to go through and look at the schedules later tonight and actually see how much it affects team, bowls, and the end results . It might not even be worth it to do.
Posted on 12/29/09 at 3:04 pm to Guster
Alright, trying to recreate OWL's ratings the best I can.
If anyone notices any mistakes, let me know.
BOWLs ordered by points awarded, no FCS penalty, if they are the same amount of points they are ranked the same.
Current Standings as of 12/29/09
If anyone notices any mistakes, let me know.
BOWLs ordered by points awarded, no FCS penalty, if they are the same amount of points they are ranked the same.
Current Standings as of 12/29/09
Posted on 12/30/09 at 11:25 am to xiv
I think all the BCS games should be worth the same; you're rewarding Texas and Bama when they were undefeated but not rewarding TCU Boise and Cinci
Posted on 12/30/09 at 11:44 am to xiv
quote:
So if the SEC beats:
Northwestern
Texas A & M
East Carolina
Clemson
Connecticut
and loses to:
Texas
Cincy
Penn State
Va. Tech
Oklahoma State
They would be the best. Nice little system you got there.
quote:
Yep, because you won't find another conference who had more bowl teams or bowl wins.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 11:49 am to Guster
quote:
Alright, trying to recreate OWL's ratings the best I can.
If anyone notices any mistakes, let me know.
BOWLs ordered by points awarded, no FCS penalty, if they are the same amount of points they are ranked the same.
sweet
now pick up my dry cleaning
Posted on 12/30/09 at 11:50 am to OWLFAN86
The pull of Owlvis is amazing.
Do you want it delivered to your home or office?
Do you want it delivered to your home or office?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 11:51 am to SprintFun
home,, then while hes there he can mow my yard
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:16 pm to SprintFun
quote:Kentucky is just as much a part of the SEC as Alabama is.
SprintFun
What's better: a great top and a shitty bottom, or a pretty good top and a pretty bad bottom?
They're the same when you're talking about conferences as a whole. I can't believe so many people can't grasp that.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:27 pm to xiv
quote:what about a decent mid-seed team from a small conference,, might they not be better than a shitty low seed from a BIG conference?
What's better: a great top and a shitty bottom, or a pretty good top and a pretty bad bottom?
at the very least, why not give them a chance,, see a different team on TV,, gives the casual viewer something new AND grows the sport,, all of college football benifits from that
can u not grasp that?
and all this top/bottom crap is gay
This post was edited on 12/30/09 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 12/30/09 at 5:36 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:Have you ever heard of the St. Petersburg Bowl, Las Vegas Bowl, Poinsettia Bowl, Texas Bowl, International Bowl, or Liberty Bowl?
what about a decent mid-seed team from a small conference,, might they not be better than a shitty low seed from a BIG conference?
at the very least, why not give them a chance,, see a different team on TV,, gives the casual viewer something new AND grows the sport,, all of college football benifits from that
can u not grasp that?
quote:The SEC as a whole dominates the other conferences as wholes. In each whole is a top, bottom, middle, etc...
and all this top/bottom crap is gay
This post was edited on 12/30/09 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 12/30/09 at 10:35 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
sweet
now pick up my dry cleaning
I just thought your rating system might turn out pretty well. And you are apparently are too much of a lazy arse to actually implement it.
Current Rankings as of 10:33 pm 12/30/09
EDIT: Third time's the charm.
This post was edited on 12/30/09 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 1/3/10 at 10:29 am to xiv
quote:
bump for edit
Looks like I made some sense afterall huh dude!!!!!
Posted on 1/3/10 at 10:33 am to dukke v
quote:I don't remember anything you said. You were a jackass in this thread. Can you please leave it again? Thanks.
Looks like I made some sense afterall huh dude!!!!!
Popular
Back to top



2




