Started By
Message

Saban in July: If we lose two games, win the SEC and don't make the playoff, I understand

Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:13 pm
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33943 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:13 pm
quote:

Saban said he realizes it's also a gamble when it comes to the playoff.

"If we lose two games this year and still win the SEC and don't get in the playoff, I understand how it works," he said. "There will probably be more teams that lost one game or no games, who will have a better opportunity to get in than we will. I'm not saying I'm going to be happy about that, but I understand that. I get that. But if it goes based on strength of schedule and how many good teams you beat, then that is the best way to pick the teams to be in the playoff."


LINK
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76526 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:17 pm to
So he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24431 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:18 pm to
By those comments alone Bama shouldn’t be in. Their best win was against 9-3 LSU.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12717 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:24 pm to
He clearly meant that if the Committee is basing the selections of SOS, that he would understand Alabama being left out as a 2 loss SEC Champ.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83478 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:24 pm to
Exactly.

How y'all be hating this honest and moral man?
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6516 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

So he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?


Sabans scenario involves not losing to unranked teams or losing by 31. Those things don't compute to him because he hasn't lost to an unranked team since 2007 and he hasn't lost by more than 14 at Alabama.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61880 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

So he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?



Seems to me that in July he called it. Said a two loss conference champ could get left out. Sorry, Ohio State.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36159 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 11:55 pm to
Parts of that quote favor each team. The first part is for Alabama, the last sentence is for Ohio State.
Posted by Finkle is Einhorn
Member since Sep 2011
4250 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 1:12 am to
Bama “Lasts”

Lost to a team that finished unranked: 2007
Last 2 times to lose by double digits: 2017, 2014
Lost by 30 points or more: 1998
Lost by 30 points or more to a team that finished unranked: 1916

Ohio State “Lasts”

All of the Above: 2017
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47648 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 5:27 am to
quote:

Lost by 30 points or more to a team that finished unranked: 1916
holy shite is this really true?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:20 am to
quote:

holy shite is this really true?

I think so. Even when we went 0-10 in 1955,the largest margin was 26 to a top 10 Auburn.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 6:26 am
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18023 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:27 am to
quote:

o he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?


No, that’s not at all what he said. Just the opposite.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35563 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:30 am to
Since we're doing Bama "lasts"

Last lost at least 8 games. 2003


Ohio State last lost at least 8 games.

NEVER
Posted by Front9Bandit
Member since Dec 2013
15432 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:31 am to
quote:

So he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?


No, just continue to melt
Posted by HeadBusta4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
11312 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:35 am to
I've been trying to find a strength of schedule ranking for the top 10, anyone know it
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64666 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:37 am to
He understands because Saban lobbied for his non conference winning team to be in before and it was allowed.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Last lost at least 8 games. 2003

That was a tough year. Heavily hit by sanctions. Fran left after the previous season and a few guys transferred out. Had to find a new coach in August because Mike Price couldn't pay a stripper with cash. Then our QB had to play most of the season injured.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71901 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:55 am to
quote:

But if it goes based on strength of schedule and how many good teams you beat, then that is the best way to pick the teams to be in the playoff.




Until it isn't, right Nick?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110888 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:48 am to
quote:

So he agreed back then that Ohio State should be in essentially?



He basically said the exact opposite of that:

quote:

"If we lose two games this year and still win the SEC and don't get in the playoff, I understand how it works,"
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17673 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:54 am to
OSU lost twice. How hard is this to understand?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram