Started By
Message

re: President Trump planning to create commission on college sports

Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:44 pm to
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

that’s bullshite and you know i

No it’s not. People absolutely hate what cfb has become. Anti Obama people would still not like him but begrudgingly accept it if it meant cfb going back to how it was.

The current libs….well you saw how they react
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5335 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

The whole transfer whenever, NIL not being pay for play has been a disaster

A disaster for who? Who’s college sports supposed to benefit? I believe that’s the players. Seems they’re better off than they have ever been.
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

Who’s college sports supposed to benefit? I believe that’s the players.

Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3182 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:25 am to
quote:

if it meant cfb going back to how it was.



So....unconstitutional by a 9-0 ruling?

College sports isn't going back, and the NCAA was stupid for not getting ahead of this years ago when it's product started looking way more like "business" than "amateur".
Posted by Underwood
Member since Dec 2022
1235 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:25 am to
quote:

prominent businesspeople with deep connections to college football



quote:

Hopefully this doesn’t mean ESPN.



Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 3:27 am
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30555 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:28 am to
quote:

people tolerate government over reaching when it’s their side doing it.
Government over reaching is what got us here to begin with.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36038 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:26 am to
What's ironic is that indirectly....and directly his boss at Alabama and other schools brought this upon themselves, and Saban actively tried to loosen up the transfer rules.

They actively emasculated any NCAA enforcement of recruiting violations.

His players would get sweet car deals....of course they were loaners. Trent Richardson's mom got that coveted Asst Mgr gig at Popeyes in Tuscaloosa after transferring from Pensacola.....and the fantastic rent deal on a 4 bdrm. All arranged.......without his knowledge, of course.
Posted by chadr07
Pineville, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
12820 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 7:25 am to
Should’ve known the first reply was going to be a stupid one
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8531 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 7:59 am to
It’s not a constitutional issue. Antitrust laws were never meant to apply to college sports. Just enact an exemption in Congress and the problem goes away.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39607 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

His players would get sweet car deals....of course they were loaners. Trent Richardson's mom got that coveted Asst Mgr gig at Popeyes in Tuscaloosa after transferring from Pensacola.....and the fantastic rent deal on a 4 bdrm. All arranged.......without his knowledge, of course.


The baffling part about all of this is that there is a large swath of people that were so bothered by Alabama's dominance under Saban, that they have chosen to convince themselves that this was only happening at Alabama.

Cam Newton didn't get paid 180K
Carnell Williams was a 3.0 student
Jamal Adams and Leonard Fournette drove used Oldsmobiles
Money was never siphoned from a children's hospital in Baton Rouge

But yea, Bama signed great players because they were giving out red chargers instead of purple ones- and that my friends is cheating and the only reason Saban was so successful
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 9:08 am
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3182 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

It’s not a constitutional issue. Antitrust laws were never meant to apply to college sports. Just enact an exemption in Congress and the problem goes away.


This is true only if college football acted like an amateur endeavor and not a business for the past few decades - which is my point. If college sports spent more effort acting amateur none of this happens.

Instead the NCAA extracted every dollar it could from every hole it could find, which made it appear to everybody the college football is just a capital enterprise like anything else trying to maximize revenue no holds barred.

Once it’s a capital enterprise than the people providing the labor are de facto employees.

If there was even a handful of decisions the NCAA made in the past 40 years that left money on the table for the sake of student athlete non-football achievement, they could cite that as a reason to say it’s still amateur, but they didn’t.

Once you say college football is a business, now the market share is split between the NCAA and the NFL and both enterprises are large enough to garner anti-trust concerns, regardless of how the laws were written to begin with.

Standard Oil didn’t have 100% market share when they got their dick slapped in the early 1900’s

Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30555 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:31 am to
quote:

If college sports spent more effort acting amateur none of this happens.
Can you define “acting amateur”?
Posted by Gings5
Member since Jul 2016
11180 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:31 am to
Let the stupid posters out themselves. Anyone who is anti-Trump is a complete moron and hates America.
Posted by CovingtonTigre
In your head Werder
Member since Mar 2021
1459 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 11:35 am to
quote:

true, but he is the greatest college coach of all time, and the reason why he retired is the current system


Not a logical reason to let him oversee a system of this magnitude.

Watching game film is not the same as overseeing a multi-billion dollar business
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
36038 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:53 pm to
Cam Newton did not get 180K


It was more like 225K plus a favorable loan

I was going to get to that, but I like the hypocrisy from Saban to fix the very thing that he actively created and benefitted from until......
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73334 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Keep out of Athletics, Dipshit, worry about your ineffective tariffs


Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3182 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:02 am to
quote:

Can you define “acting amateur”?


The Big Ten for the past 20 years is the counter-example.

1) Traditionally the Big Ten did not play games Thanksgiving weekend so athletes can spend time with their families. When the Big Ten went and expanded to have a Conference Championship game ($$$$), the also backfilled games to Thanksgiving Weekend (also $$$$)

2) The Big Ten then expanded so much that Rutgers can play in conference away games at Oregon. This is one thing for football where the games are on Saturday, but this means the back end of the women's basketball bench are doing the same thing on a Tuesday mid-semester.

______________________________________


At any point in time, they could have said

"we're going to keep our tradition of not having games Thanksgiving weekend so that student athletes can spend that time with their families"

or

"We need to keep our conference as a regional conference; we can't have volleyball players fighting jet lag taking their physics exam after needing to fly cross country for a Wednesday conference game 3 time zones away"

Instead, every single word uttered by officials was identical to those who are motivated entirely by business and revenue generation.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram