Started By
Message

re: Possible new Louisiana high school athletic association announced tonight

Posted on 3/17/16 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30345 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

ust move up or down the teams that need to be moved up or down based on competitiveness


Wasn't it like this year's ago, then the 5A and 4A schools cried about little Evangel and Curtis being too good and they should be in the class associated with their school size. Then they won every 2A title and those guys got pissy. Then they split.

They should treat the divisions like European country soccer leagues. Let teams move up that are good, and let the crappy ones move down. Riverside and Madison prep would stop winning worthless class b titles.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15294 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:30 am to
That was proposed, as was the idea of a "Super Class" open to any larger or consistently superior schools. But once the split was passed for the other sports, this past January, all other ideas were removed.
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10958 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:25 am to
I'll keep hammering this point until someone listens:

Classifying by enrollment is as outdated as the telegraph
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62261 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:41 am to
Classifying by enrollment/sending Evangel and Curtis down wasn't about competitiveness. It was about trying to bankrupt Evangel. They were bankrolling their school by playing 5A schools with big fanbases. They would bring 500-1000 people and split the money with 5-6K in attendance. They played a regular season game against WM in Independence Stadium in front of 34K. The thought was to make them play in front of smaller crowds/make less money. Also they thought a small title wouldn't be as appealing to recruits. It's honestly worked. Evangel is a shell of their 90's/early 00's selves.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
69181 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:42 am to
Super Class would have solved all.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35077 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Classifying by enrollment/sending Evangel and Curtis down wasn't about competitiveness. It was about trying to bankrupt Evangel. They were bankrolling their school by playing 5A schools with big fanbases. They would bring 500-1000 people and split the money with 5-6K in attendance. They played a regular season game against WM in Independence Stadium in front of 34K. The thought was to make them play in front of smaller crowds/make less money. Also they thought a small title wouldn't be as appealing to recruits. It's honestly worked. Evangel is a shell of their 90's/early 00's selves.


but not because of that - because the booty tribe left and went to CBA---.. meanwhile it caused massive bad blood which has us where we are now.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62261 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:04 am to
Firing Booty was the dumbest thing Evangel ever did. Calvary is basically early Evangel now.
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10958 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Classifying by enrollment/sending Evangel and Curtis down wasn't about competitiveness. It was about trying to bankrupt Evangel. They were bankrolling their school by playing 5A schools with big fanbases. They would bring 500-1000 people and split the money with 5-6K in attendance. They played a regular season game against WM in Independence Stadium in front of 34K. The thought was to make them play in front of smaller crowds/make less money. Also they thought a small title wouldn't be as appealing to recruits. It's honestly worked. Evangel is a shell of their 90's/early 00's selves.


I don't care what the motivations were - classifying teams for athletic competition based on school enrollment is completely asinine.

If you really want to do it right, classification should be done based on an athletic program's participation rate, resources, and history of success.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54820 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I don't care what the motivations were - classifying teams for athletic competition based on school enrollment is completely asinine.


is it not a good general rough guide? especially in football. you can count on one hand the 1A schools that attempt to play 5A competition regularly, let alone beat them

but yeah it did come from a different time and place...
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
69181 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 2:00 pm to
How long until Calvary starts rolling like late 90s Evangel?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41061 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

If you really want to do it right, classification should be done based on an athletic program's participation rate, resources, and history of success.


Would you average that across all sports?
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62261 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 8:00 pm to
They would've went back to back if Shea didn't leave.
Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
21659 posts
Posted on 3/18/16 at 8:09 pm to
So is this like the old LISA league?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54820 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 4:26 am to
quote:

Would you average that across all sports?



the fact that a baseball, etc. has to play by the football classifications is asinine.
Posted by Caddo
Member since Dec 2014
469 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 8:44 am to
Calvary did go back to back. They could have 3 peated if Shea Patterson had stayed.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138532 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 9:13 am to
WM is not sharing anything

They enjoy being a big fish in a small pond and being the benefactor of top talent moving into their district on an annual basis.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49404 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I don't care what the motivations were - classifying teams for athletic competition based on school enrollment is completely asinine.

If you really want to do it right, classification should be done based on an athletic program's participation rate, resources, and history of success.


I'm not sure how you do that.
Posted by Lakebound
Member since Nov 2004
3991 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 10:37 am to
quote:

no Lisa was comprised of ZERO schools that LEFT the LHSAA to be members there........big difference



Not zero. Sam Barthe moved from the LHSAA to LISA.

LINK
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62261 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 11:08 am to
quote:

WM is not sharing anything They enjoy being a big fish in a small pond


I agree with this.

quote:

Being the benefactor of top talent moving into their district on an annual basis


Actually not the case. They opened up the parish and you can go wherever you want as long as it's your freshman year. Neville and Ouachita are the ones pulling all of the talent, even a lot out of WM. Neville's QB went to WM feeders in elementary and middle school. OCS takes several every year too.
This post was edited on 3/19/16 at 11:22 am
Posted by nevilletiger79
Monroe
Member since Jan 2009
17570 posts
Posted on 3/19/16 at 11:37 am to
quote:

They opened up the parish and you can go wherever you want as long as it's your freshman year. Neville and Ouachita are the ones pulling all of the talent, even a lot out of WM. Neville's QB went to WM feeders in elementary and middle school. OCS takes several every year too.


..and here we go
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram