- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:02 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
'm in ohio right now. I will make a promise to go to every sports bar and laugh at ohio state fans
Where are you? Ill come kick you int he nuts for constantly being obnoxious on here.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:03 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Add 1 scholarship and another year of probation to the self-imposed penalties. No bowl ban.
Well your information was pretty crappy.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:03 pm to bayoujd
nice find, i could have swore i seen it as 4 per year but ESPNs BREAKING NEWS is reporting only 9 total.
there is a BIG difference between those two penalties.
there is a BIG difference between those two penalties.
This post was edited on 12/20/11 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:04 pm to 7thWardTiger
quote:
For those of you expecting the hammer to drop...fuggetaboutit (as I've said all along).
Add 1 scholarship and another year of probation to the self-imposed penalties. No bowl ban.
Look for Tressel to get a 5 year show cause.
This is what I'm hearing from people much closer to the situatio
I remember some ohio state fans saying nothing would happen and laughing at us because we were delusional
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:04 pm to CP3LSU25
youre really butt-fricking up this thread fwiw.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:06 pm to rocket31
From the ESPN article.
It's 3 a year for 3 years. 9 total.
quote:
The NCAA also issued a public reprimand and censure, put the Buckeyes on probation through Dec. 19, 2014, and reduced football scholarships from 85 to 82 through the 2014-15 academic year.
It's 3 a year for 3 years. 9 total.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:07 pm to CP3LSU25
No one I know of said "nothing" would happen. The only thing unexpected was the one year bowl ban.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:08 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
I remember some ohio state fans saying nothing would happen and laughing at us because we were delusional
just back out of the thread
This post was edited on 12/20/11 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:08 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Where are you? Ill come kick you int he nuts for constantly being obnoxious on here.
come meet me and and bring your broad
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:14 pm to VABuckeye
quote:
Essentially I missed on the bowl ban WHICH IS frickING UNPRECENDENTED for a FTM charge.
Tressel covering up for the Tattoo Five so they could play in the Sugar Bowl, even though he knew they were ineligible before the start of the 2010 season, is why they're getting a bowl ban.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:20 pm to rocket31
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
youre really butt-fricking up this thread fwiw.
This post was edited on 12/20/11 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:20 pm to teke184
ncaa.org
The penalties, some of which were self-imposed by the university and adopted by the committee, include:
•Public reprimand and censure.
•Three years of probation from Dec. 20, 2011, through Dec. 19, 2014. The public report contains further details on the conditions of this probation.
•Postseason ban for the 2012 football season, which includes the conference championship game.
•Reduction of football scholarships from 85 to 82 for each of the 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years. This is an increase from the university’s proposal of five initial scholarships spread over three academic years.
•Vacation of all wins for the 2010 football regular season, including the 2010 Big Ten Conference co-championship and participation in the 2011 Sugar Bowl. The public report contains further details (self-imposed by the university).
•Forfeiture of $338,811, which is the amount the university received through the Big Ten Conference revenue sharing for its appearance in the bowl game (self-imposed by the university).
•Five-year show-cause order for the former head coach. The public report contains further details.
•Disassociation of the booster for 10 years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
•Disassociation of a former student-athlete for five years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
The penalties, some of which were self-imposed by the university and adopted by the committee, include:
•Public reprimand and censure.
•Three years of probation from Dec. 20, 2011, through Dec. 19, 2014. The public report contains further details on the conditions of this probation.
•Postseason ban for the 2012 football season, which includes the conference championship game.
•Reduction of football scholarships from 85 to 82 for each of the 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years. This is an increase from the university’s proposal of five initial scholarships spread over three academic years.
•Vacation of all wins for the 2010 football regular season, including the 2010 Big Ten Conference co-championship and participation in the 2011 Sugar Bowl. The public report contains further details (self-imposed by the university).
•Forfeiture of $338,811, which is the amount the university received through the Big Ten Conference revenue sharing for its appearance in the bowl game (self-imposed by the university).
•Five-year show-cause order for the former head coach. The public report contains further details.
•Disassociation of the booster for 10 years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
•Disassociation of a former student-athlete for five years, including among other conditions, the prohibition of any financial or other support (self-imposed by the university).
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:26 pm to teke184
quote:
Tressel covering up for the Tattoo Five so they could play in the Sugar Bowl, even though he knew they were ineligible before the start of the 2010 season, is why they're getting a bowl ban.
I think what came out about the car wash jobs is what pushed the NCAA over the edge for the bowl ban.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:27 pm to roadGator
I really wonder why Gene Smith is still our AD.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:31 pm to taylork37
quote:
I really wonder why Gene Smith is still our AD.
I think keeping him as their AD is probably worse punishment than any scholarship loss or bowl ban.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:32 pm to taylork37
quote:
I really wonder why Gene Smith is still our AD.
This is beyond me. Dude's a joke of an AD. I hear Fickell hates him.
Posted on 12/20/11 at 2:43 pm to taylork37
quote:
Should have taken that bowl hit this year with 6-6 record
Yep....completely mishandled AGAIN by Gene Smith
I was thinking this earlier in the season when Miami took theirs. But it was pointed out that Gene Smith said there wouldn't be a bowl ban and with a new coach the bowl practices would be helpful to adjust to the new system.
Now Meyer can't coach the team through this year's bowl game. They lose out on next year's bowl game & all of the practice time that would come with it. How Smith still has a job is amazing.
Popular
Back to top


0



