- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not a single player in the National League is hitting .300
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:43 pm to OceanMan
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:43 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Let me make it easier for you:
I'm not the one who needs, or is pandering for, simplicity
quote:
not goals
The question is how to use stats to mold the strategy that leads to the most probable positive outcome, which most would call a goal.
I'm not a baseball guy so I don't particularly know why (or why not) BA is or isn't useful in that answer, but as a judge of rhetoric, you have failed to defend it in this thread as of this post.
You want to make the analyses exponentially more complicated and ad hoc, focused on situations and not the total picture, to create this one idiosyncratic scenario where a higher BA may have value
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:43 pm to Dale Murphy
quote:
All the cyber nerds will come in here and tell you that BA is no longer relevant. Which is BS but they’re not smart enough to understand so we’ve just got to ignore them.
I don't think analytics are infallible or anything but there's a reason pro clubs worth billions of dollars use them.
A guy batting .250/.350/.550 is a much better hitter than Luis Arraez batting .300 off of singles exclusively, no BS about it
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:43 pm to Madking
quote:
SFP is famous for presenting false histories of sports that he makes up himself so don’t take him too seriously.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Laughter is often a reaction from guilt.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:48 pm to Madking
quote:
Laughter is often a reaction from guilt.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 4:50 pm to Madking
quote:
The problem is people who don’t know anything about sports are always looking for a singular stat to explain everything. They always think the new thing is the end all when really it’s just an updated regurgitation of something old.
Nothing more clearly explains you have no idea what we are talking about
OBP includes batting avg, so it is not just a singular stat it’s actually more inclusive.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:00 pm to H-Town Tiger
Pretty ironic that you continue clinging to this strawman when I’ve already debunked it.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:06 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Ty Cobb was a civil rights hero
Close.enough as was his Father and Grandfather.
You could even say all of em were way ahead of the times
quote:
His grandfather refused to fight in the Confederate army because of the slavery issue. And his father was an educator and state senator who spoke up for his black constituents and is known to have once broken up a lynch mob.
Cobb himself was never asked about segregation until 1952, when the Texas League was integrating, and Sporting News asked him what he thought. “The Negro should be accepted wholeheartedly, and not grudgingly,” he said. “The Negro has the right to play professional baseball and whose [sic] to say he has not?” By that time he had attended many Negro league games, sometimes throwing out the first ball and often sitting in the dugout with the players. He is quoted as saying that Willie Mays was the only modern-day player he’d pay to see and that Roy Campanella was the ballplayer that reminded him most of himself.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:07 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Would Tony Gwynn even make a team today? He averaged less than 7 HR per season for his career.
Tony Gwynn had 763 extra base hits, had as many as 49 doubles and 13 triples in a season. He may not have hit the ball over the wall a lot, but he didn’t just poke singles over the infield. He hit the ball hard.
This post was edited on 7/13/25 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:11 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
No. BA is literally useless when the other two are available. Why do you need it for context.
I just told you. If I have OBP, I only know how often he gets on base, but if I also have BA I now know how often he walks, so I now know more about the batter. So that's why they give BA first, it is very simple and embedded in the calculation of other stats. It is a single variable in a multi variable formula.
Similarly, with SLG%, it's on a per at-bat basis. Using it in conjunction with BA tells me how many extra basis per hit, which gives a clearer idea of how often they hit for extra bases than SLG alone, which weights walks an singles the same.
quote:
That is the whole point of this thread. And then you are going to say I don't know what I am looking at?
Yes, I think I just proved my point that you don't, and clearly don't know anything about (or completely ignore) other advanced stats that use BA in the equation.
quote:
to generate offense
vague and not interesting, pass
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:14 pm to OceanMan
quote:
I now know how often he walks
Walk rate, which is it’s own stat
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:15 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
This entire thread I’ve made the same argument that OBP is a better stat than BA and getting on base was more important than “putting the ball in play”. Please note that’s all part of the same argument. No goalpost was moved and nothing in that argument failed.
I just don't understand why one has to be superior, they are meant to be used together. Using multiple stats gives you more information....which is the point of advanced stats
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:16 pm to OceanMan
They’ve tried to twist the argument from “batting average is meaningless” to “batting average is everything”. It just shows they couldn’t prove the first argument.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not the one who needs, or is pandering for, simplicity
I need simplicy but arguing for something complex...sounds like SFP doesn't agree but resorting to word salad. I'll have the lawfare please.
quote:
I'm not a baseball guy so I don't particularly know why (or why not) BA is or isn't useful in that answer, but as a judge of rhetoric, you have failed to defend it in this thread as of this post.
You don't know anything about the topic, but here you are giving your opinion.
My point is simple and easily understood. If A+B=C, why would I settle for C when A is available as well?
quote:
You want to make the analyses exponentially more complicated and ad hoc, focused on situations and not the total picture, to create this one idiosyncratic scenario where a higher BA may have value
wtf are you going on about
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:23 pm to OceanMan
quote:
have OBP, I only know how often he gets on base, but if I also have BA I now know how often he walks
Again, useless when you have the on-base. And slugging gives you the context of the hit. Anyone that understands these stats does not need the batting average to tell them anything lol.
quote:
vague and not interesting, pass
From the Madking school of debunking.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:26 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Walk rate, which is it’s own stat
Sigh.
I was asked if given a slash line containing BA/OBP/SLG, why I would ever look at BA. So thanks for proving my point that BA produces more stats when used with the other 2.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:29 pm to Madking
quote:
They’ve tried to twist the argument from “batting average is meaningless” to “batting average is everything”. It just shows they couldn’t prove the first argument.
It's been pretty bad, I appreciate your support
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Again, useless when you have the on-base. And slugging gives you the context of the hit. Anyone that understands these stats does not need the batting average to tell them anything lol.
Then why do they provide it in the slash line you referenced?
quote:
From the Madking school of debunking.
I've given a lot more time to explaining myself than you have. But just for the sake of closing the loop, I'll take the list with Aaron Judge on it.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:36 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Second basemen used to be Juan Pierre and Orlando Hudson . Now they’re fricking huge and can rake. The look of the players is different to accommodate the style of play
You got downvoted on this but I actually just completed running the heights and weights of every starting second baseman in MLB. The average second baseman is 5/11 and 1/2 and weighs 189 pounds. There are second baseman who are as tall as 6-2 and weigh as much as 225 pounds.
Just to pull a couple of names out of the past that people will recognize, Glenn Hubbard was 5-9, 150 and Mark Lemke was 5-10, 167.
Middle infielders used to be shrimps but now they are relative behemoths.
And something people haven’t mentioned, weight training was frowned upon in the old days because it would make you musclebound and as John Kruk once said, “We’re ball players not athletes.” But every clubhouse now has full strength training equipment and players are encouraged to get ripped.
Posted on 7/13/25 at 5:41 pm to OceanMan
quote:
At the end of the day what you want is to score more runs than the other team.
quote:
which is accomplished when you :put the ball in play when they need to
Not exclusively a walk with the bases loaded does score a run
Popular
Back to top



1


