Started By
Message

NFL to consider changing fumble through endzone touchback rule

Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5498 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:16 pm
I missed it earlier this month and didn't see a thread about it but John Parry on ESPN just mentioned that the competition committee will look at it this offseason and Rapoport tweeted about it a few weeks ago:
quote:

Ian Rapoport
@RapSheet
NFL executive Troy Vincent says at the league meeting, among other things, that the league will take a look at plays where the player fumbles through the end zone(!).

Is it too punitive? “Do we need to give them a chance again?”

It will be studied this offseason.

X
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 8:17 pm
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40446 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:19 pm to
No keep at as is
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145109 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:20 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53111 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:23 pm to
I put some respect on your name in the game thread.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 8:25 pm
Posted by 33inNC
Charlotte, NC
Member since Mar 2011
4987 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:29 pm to
So stupid. With high risk comes high reward. Don't change shite.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145109 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:32 pm to
Posted by TigerSaints318
Shreveport
Member since Dec 2009
1796 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:33 pm to
Give the “recovering” team the ball at the 1.
Posted by BatonProv
Member since Dec 2023
176 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:34 pm to
I hear this every single time that it happens lol
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40446 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:35 pm to
It gives offensive players incentive to be careful with the ball, you will see a lot more reckless reaching if it’s just going to go out the side of the end zone.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62741 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:38 pm to
Second dumbest rule in all of sports.

Dumbest rule is a batter gets a chance to run to first base after a dropped strike 3
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34457 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:40 pm to
Jesus.

No need to change the rule.

Why award the offense for fricking up?
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
3877 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:40 pm to
Yay!!! Another rule to frick over the defense.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34457 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Second dumbest rule in all of sports

No it ain't.

If the offense doesn't value the ball enough to keep it from going out of the back of the EZ, then they deserve to lose possession and have B(see defense) take over at the 20.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145109 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

to frick over the defense.

Posted by Uhtred
Bebbanburg
Member since Sep 2018
702 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:44 pm to
It does “feel” wrong that in all other circumstances where a player fumbles the ball forward and it goes out of bounds, the ball is returned to the spot of the fumble. Yet this one results in a turnover.

Yet at the same time, fumbling through the end zone has always carried with it this penalty.

I like keeping it as is, but I definitely understand the argument.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 8:45 pm
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31064 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

It gives offensive players incentive to be careful with the ball, you will see a lot more reckless reaching if it’s just going to go out the side of the end zone.


It makes no sense to treat a fumble differently at that spot on the field vs everywhere else on the field. They should bring it back to where the fumble occurred.
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5498 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

It makes no sense to treat a fumble differently at that spot on the field vs everywhere else on the field. They should bring it back to where the fumble occurred.

Fumble rules do vary by when it happens or possession so it's not like every situation is the same.

A fumble can't be advanced if it happens on 4th down or in the last two mintutes of a half or if a returner doesn't gain possesion of the ball (muff).
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35461 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

It makes no sense to treat a fumble differently at that spot on the field vs everywhere else on the field.


Well they do it with catches. Maybe the endzone is a special place.
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
15779 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:51 pm to
Yeah it needs to be changed to possession at the 20 going in to score. Shouldn’t go to the other team
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145109 posts
Posted on 12/30/23 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Well they do it with catches
interesting thought

I move we make incompletions in the end zone count as interceptions
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram