- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NCAA house settlement has been approved. Schools can now directly pay athletes
Posted on 6/7/25 at 7:18 am to Indiangensing
Posted on 6/7/25 at 7:18 am to Indiangensing
quote:
this good or bad? Seems like nothing is changing to what is already happening except now schools can pay on their own...
If it actually killed what people are currently calling NIL, then I would say it is good if you’re a fan of a university willing to pay full rev share and fill all allowable scholarships for sports you care about winning in.
If lawsuits allow the current NIL environment to exist along with rev share, then all this does is accelerate the demise of these systems.
Still not sure how this survives a Title IX challenge. The second a dem gets back the whitehouse, this thing is toast.
This post was edited on 6/7/25 at 7:20 am
Posted on 6/7/25 at 7:35 am to evil cockroach
quote:
buddy, given the current landscape; I wish the House of Saud were LSU fans.
We need to send Livvy to UAE to gain favor with the oil money
Posted on 6/7/25 at 7:50 am to RLDSC FAN
so how much will texas end up spending before they finally win a national championship in football/basketball/baseball?
pretty sure they were over $40 million in NIL deals last year and didn't get it done, maybe double it and they'll finally end the slump
pretty sure they were over $40 million in NIL deals last year and didn't get it done, maybe double it and they'll finally end the slump
This post was edited on 6/7/25 at 7:57 am
Posted on 6/7/25 at 7:55 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/7/25 at 8:20 am to RLDSC FAN
College sports sucks now so bad
Posted on 6/7/25 at 8:50 am to Raoul Stimulato
quote:
Like any of you junkies will stop watching altogether on some posture principle. Puh-leaze. I’m cfb till I’m 6 feet under. And so are you.
Nah. Lost interest when all of this bullshite kicked off. I’ll check this site to see if LSU won, and if they did, great. Just doesn’t have the same feel. Just my opinion.
You do you though Superfan.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 8:52 am to skullhawk
quote:
If it actually killed what people are currently calling NIL, then I would say it is good if you’re a fan of a university willing to pay full rev share and fill all allowable scholarships for sports you care about winning in. If lawsuits allow the current NIL environment to exist along with rev share, then all this does is accelerate the demise of these systems.
It will have little effect on NIL. NIL means a player can go outside the university to make money based on their own persona. The universities can’t regulate it outside of banning boosters from making deals with players.
But an NIL collective can “collect” sponsors and businesses to put the players to “work.”
I think the best schools can do with the new bill is construct contracts that limit the transfer portal.
Either way, the sport is dead as we knew it. Gambling still exists so it’ll be fine. But those of us who grew up playing and watching football are going to drift away.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 8:56 am to StringedInstruments
When does football and basketball the only revenue makers tell the rest of the sports to fund your own way
Posted on 6/7/25 at 8:57 am to nicholastiger
quote:
When does football and basketball the only revenue makers tell the rest of the sports to fund your own way
Can’t because of title IX.
Maybe they break away into an official minor league and use some kind of loophole to keep the jerseys and facilities on campus? But probably not.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:17 am to nicholastiger
quote:
When does football and basketball the only revenue makers tell the rest of the sports to fund your own way
When do we apply this to society as a whole? Why is it ok to subsidize people sometimes, but not others?
LSU is public. The government that controls them subsidizes all sorts of things.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:20 am to Cliff Booth
Honestly, I don’t care what money any of them make because it won’t be from me so it’s not really my business.
What I care about is kids picking a school and sticking with it. That’s the only real difference between college and pro. It’s cool having Big Ben on the call or seeing Shaq at a football game because they’re “one of us”. You take that part away and it really is just minor leagues.
I just want to fast forward to the part where players start signing 3 year contracts.
What I care about is kids picking a school and sticking with it. That’s the only real difference between college and pro. It’s cool having Big Ben on the call or seeing Shaq at a football game because they’re “one of us”. You take that part away and it really is just minor leagues.
I just want to fast forward to the part where players start signing 3 year contracts.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:31 am to Cliff Booth
quote:
It’s cool having Big Ben on the call or seeing Shaq at a football game because they’re “one of us”.
A large part of that is because they assimilated into the culture of LSU as STUDENTS. These guys won’t have as much allegiance or connection to their schools if it’s just an entry-level job. And with bullshite virtual instruction being used for these athletes, they will never feel the camaraderie of their campuses no matter how many games they play during a season.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:35 am to StringedInstruments
Can’t argue with that. You’ll still have the occasional Will Campbell type, but it’ll probably be fewer and farther in between.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:40 am to Indiangensing
quote:
Is this good or bad? Seems like nothing is changing to what is already happening except now schools can pay on their own...
Nothing is changing?
Schools are essentially going to be required to pay athletes out of their direct athletic funds if they want any semblance of a competitive program.
That's a pretty massive change. Will it affect the big sports like football and basketball? To a smaller degree because most money will be funneled there, but the smaller sports (the sports that actually make up the majority of college sports) are going to be negatively affected.
Colleges will basically have to choose what sports they want to keep because they simply won't have enough money to go around and fund them all.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 9:59 am to BilJ
Tennessee filed the suit yet to stop this? I thought they had said they would not agree to this?
What happens if a school refuses to sign on?
What happens if a school refuses to sign on?
Posted on 6/7/25 at 10:31 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
It will have little effect on NIL. NIL means a player can go outside the university to make money based on their own persona. The universities can’t regulate it outside of banning boosters from making deals with players. But an NIL collective can “collect” sponsors and businesses to put the players to “work.
The entire point of this NIL clearinghouse is to kill these grey area arrangements with collectives. I have no doubt they will still exist, but they will be for more realistic rates and require some level of effort from the student athlete.
Like most are reporting, this concept will be litigated, and the clearinghouse may end up dead. I know LSU is under the impression and preparing for, maybe naively, that the NIL space will change dramatically. If the clearinghouse does have its intended effect, we just go back to the bagman.
Posted on 6/7/25 at 10:41 am to skullhawk
Posted on 6/7/25 at 2:46 pm to BilJ
quote:
It falls apart once dumb arse fans quit falling over themselves to foot the bill while the universities and talent get rich.
I'm sort of done with it all!
Posted on 6/8/25 at 7:56 am to TigerRoyale
I’ve been done with it for 45 years when UGA bought Herschel which turned Dooley from a decent coach to a so called legend. But I love the sport so I still watched even though I knew it was all fake.
And then Auburn bought Cam and again no one did a thing.
This current iteration will just be more of the same with teams breaking the rules to get an on field advantage. I just ish my team would have been cheating as well instead of taking losses to merecenaries. I’m just glad a lot more fans have jumped in my boat of seeing how fake the sport has been.
And then Auburn bought Cam and again no one did a thing.
This current iteration will just be more of the same with teams breaking the rules to get an on field advantage. I just ish my team would have been cheating as well instead of taking losses to merecenaries. I’m just glad a lot more fans have jumped in my boat of seeing how fake the sport has been.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 11:57 am to BilJ
quote:
It falls apart once dumb arse fans quit falling over themselves to foot the bill while the universities and talent get rich.
This.
From now on, I’m only giving to specific sport fundraising initiatives on my alma mater’s athletic website, like new hurdles for the track team or some shite like that. New batting cages for one of the stick sports. Frick all this NIL and paying athletes directly for them to still bolt elsewhere a year later.
Popular
Back to top


1




