- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MLB batting avg .242
Posted on 7/7/24 at 6:41 pm to jangalang
Posted on 7/7/24 at 6:41 pm to jangalang
quote:
I'll take 3-4 every time.
For me there's a qualifier. 3 singles? Can you maybe throw in a double, then there's a discussion IMHO. Rod Carew could slap singles around like nobody's business, but he never sniffed a title.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:20 pm to Tiger Ugly
Carew slugged .429 for his career. He could slap singles but he also could hit the ball hard. You don’t have to be a slugger to hit the ball hard.
This post was edited on 7/7/24 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:23 pm to jangalang
quote:me too
I'll take 3-4 every time.
give me the pither who wins 14 games and pitches 200 innings for cy young and steven kwan for mvp
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:22 pm to InkStainedWretch
Depends on who’s batting behind them.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:23 pm to Tiger Ugly
quote:
ut if you shoot 33% from 3 it's just as efficient as shooting 50% from 2.
You draw more fouls shooting for 2… those analytics don’t take into account three point plays, getting into the bonus early, starters sitting due to foul trouble, and defensive ineffectiveness on the court when they know they can’t pick up a foul at that particular time
Posted on 7/8/24 at 4:42 pm to InkStainedWretch
quote:
But the downside is that it does not take entertaining the paying customers into consideration whatsoever.
Which is kinda the point of spectator sports, to entertain people. People don’t pay money to watch front offices match wits over who can make the game more efficient they’re paying to watch players do great things and use their athletic ability which there isn’t enough of in modern MLB. Baseball has become so “smart” that it’s stupid
Posted on 7/8/24 at 4:58 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:hell yea. We don't want fancy stats that I don't understand or people playing a sport at its absolute pinnacle where decisions are made intelligently
People don’t pay money to watch front offices match wits over who can make the game more efficient they’re paying to watch players do great things and use their athletic ability which there isn’t enough of in modern MLB. Baseball has become so “smart” that it’s stupid
We want bunts, valuing players by RBIs, and above all managers going by their GUT
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:03 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
Yeah the stats people are super fricking annoying. My god who the hell cares stfu and watch the game.
Thank God no other sport is anywhere near that bad about stats/analytics.
Thank God no other sport is anywhere near that bad about stats/analytics.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:13 pm to chalmetteowl
Going to the hoop and drawing fouls is like taking pitches . They both get starters out of the game.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:17 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
give me the pither who wins 14 games and pitches 200 innings for cy young
Gerrit Cole, come on down!
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:30 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
We don't want fancy stats that I don't understand or people playing a sport at its absolute pinnacle where decisions are made intelligently
Shredding pitchers arms by pushing them to the limit and tolerating multitudes of strikeouts is the pinnacle of arrogance
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:36 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:I thought we like athletic greatness
by pushing them to the limit
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:51 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
I don’t disagree with you one iota but what analytics seeks to do is prioritize getting the W, which is the ultimate successful outcome. Not the style points or entertaining stuff. I would imagine that most fans want the W too, although the reality is that only one team gets to win its last game and a whole lot of them even today with the expanded playoffs won’t get the opportunity. So there’s got to be some entertainment value. There are competing interests and you need an equilibrium.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 6:51 pm to Lester Earl
Lester dropping fricking testicles on peoples heads
Posted on 7/8/24 at 6:53 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
I thought we like athletic greatness
I hear ya, but a person can appreciate athletic greatness and not be entertained…and obviously it’s subjective. But for example, triathletes are exceptional athletes and I respect what they do, but I have very little interest in watching them. Track and field, swimming, and others…the athletes are incredible. But there’s a reason there is little interest except during the Olympics and other select events. It’s just not very compelling entertainment…as I say I certainly don’t speak for everyone on these sports, but they don’t move the needle for most of the public. I think the athletic ability, plus the intangibles…strategy, guys playing their roles, luck, etc are what drive the popularity of the major sports.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 7:05 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
valuing players by RBIs,
I wonder if RBIs should have been replaced by percent of runners in scoring position driven in (with runners driven in from first and home runs essentially being “free”)… because not everyone gets the same amount of opportunities…
Posted on 7/8/24 at 7:13 pm to InkStainedWretch
Hitters see these pitchers less often. You get 5-6 from the starter and then 3-4 guys all throwing 95+ with crazy rpms & spin rates. Not only are way more pitchers throwing harder, they pair those power fastballs with nasty offspeed stuff AND hitters are seeing a guy twice, at most, and usually only once.
It’s always been insanely difficult to hit MLB pitching, and it’s getting more difficult every year with the new technology.
It’s always been insanely difficult to hit MLB pitching, and it’s getting more difficult every year with the new technology.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 7/8/24 at 10:53 pm to RB10
quote:
then 3-4 guys all throwing 95+ with crazy rpms & spin rates
What hasn’t been talked about nearly enough in the analytics era is how these guys are controlling those pitches… you’d think velo like 95+ and those curves and sliders would be tougher to keep in the strike zone…
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:40 am to Lester Earl
You calling anyone a “casual” is pretty funny since all you do is watch 12 second Twitter clips and pay for stat sites so you can pretend you have a clue.
Popular
Back to top

1










