- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:46 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Well skipper definitely told the red something and Idk if you can report for someone else
It doesn’t even look like Skipper said anything to the official. They’re still showing replays.
Looks like Skipper (70) ran over and said something to the other Lions players.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:47 pm to RB10
You just said you agreed that he told the ref 68 was gonna be eligible lol
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:47 pm to RB10
This dude is straight victim shaming the player.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:48 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
You just said you agreed that he told the ref 68 was gonna be eligible lol
quote:
Dan Campbell: "Two people can't report. I don't want to talk about it. I explained everything pregame to a tee."
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:48 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
You just said you agreed that he told the ref 68 was gonna be eligible lol
I said “probably” because the ref said 70 reported. They just showed that 70 never even got close enough to report to the ref.
You’ve been wrong at every turn. Let it go.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:49 pm to RB10
You said ding ding ding when the guy said skipper told the ref 68 was eligible . It’s on the previous page. That’s all I’m saying
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:50 pm to RB10
Who knows what really happened, but it’s pretty clear the ref fricked up. Lucky for the Cows, but I’d be pretty pissed if I were a Lions fan.
All of this could have been avoided if McCarthy wasn’t an idiot.
All of this could have been avoided if McCarthy wasn’t an idiot.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:51 pm to AgCoug
The throw on second down was dumb and it looked even dumber because it was a miscomunication . Like who takes a shot into the endzone in that situation
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:52 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
You said ding ding ding when the guy said skipper told the ref 68 was eligible . It’s on the previous page. That’s all I’m saying
“Probably”
That was before I saw the replay of 70 not getting within 5 yards of the official.
“That’s all I’m saying”
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:52 pm to AgCoug
quote:
All of this could have been avoided if McCarthy wasn’t an idiot.
right here
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:52 pm to bad93ex
They’re still talking about it on the postgame.
The official fricked up. Plain and simple.
The official fricked up. Plain and simple.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:53 pm to bad93ex
ESPNs head ref said that wasn't true and that 2 people can report if they want. SVP directly asked that question
I haven't no idea what the rule is though.
I haven't no idea what the rule is though.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:54 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
That’s understandable
They’re using 70 running on the field to try and cover the officials frick up. 70 never even interacted with the official. 68 did.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:55 pm to PaperTiger
So they had 4 linemen to the right of center and the OT on the left was supposed to be an eligible receiver?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:55 pm to PaperTiger
I don’t think they intentionally fricked anyone but it still doesn’t make it any better if they truly didn’t understand the rule or if they got confused
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:55 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Tim Twentyman
@ttwentyman
Dan Skipper said he did not report as eligible to the officials on the 2pt play that got called back. Decker said he reported.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:57 pm to RB10
I didn’t watch postgame I just went by what it looked like live and what the announcers and booth ref were saying and it looked like skipper ran up and reported and that 68 was on the line of scrimmage.
So I guess the guy that Troy and buck showed on the los really wasn’t 68?
So I guess the guy that Troy and buck showed on the los really wasn’t 68?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:58 pm to Tigerpride18
It seems like a case of mistaken identity by the ref should be reviewable.
Popular
Back to top


1




