- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:38 pm to RB10
Am I mistaken that the refs would make a broadcasted announcement if 68 was eligible. So Dallas would be less likely to be tricked?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:38 pm to tgrbaitn08
Campbell on NLFN now.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:38 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Well they may have called the wrong penalty but they could have called him ineligible anyway because the wr wasn’t off the line. They could have called 3 fouls but picked the one that may get them in deep shite lol
You’re still wrong.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:39 pm to TxWadingFool
quote:
If he was eligible receiver then it was an illegal formation as he was uncovered by anyone lined up outside of him. Either way it was a penalty.
Wrong.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:39 pm to RB10
How, he was uncovered
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:40 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
How, he was uncovered
No he wasn’t. WR was on the line.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:40 pm to Diseasefreeforall
Okay so 68 reported but he was covered up by WR thereby ineligible to be eligible I think. I have no clue now
Still though they never announced the reporting which was a rule change made after Belichick used it vs the Coltsin a playoff game
Still though they never announced the reporting which was a rule change made after Belichick used it vs the Coltsin a playoff game
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm to RB10
The ref in the booth said that they could have called two other fouls even if he did report. Or was he saying that it was three fouls only if he didn’t report ?
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm to RB10
Campbell just said the explanation was that 70 reported and 2 ineligibles can't report.
I still think 70 tried to report for 68 probably after 68 reported and the refs thought 70 was talking about himself.
I still think 70 tried to report for 68 probably after 68 reported and the refs thought 70 was talking about himself.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
The red in the booth said that they could have called two other fouls even if he did report. Or was he saying that it was three fouls only if he didn’t report ?
Ref in the booth was completely incorrect.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm to sms151t
quote:
Still though they never announced
Did they announce that the other player reported? My TV was on mute. If not, that’s completely on the refs because the admitted in the penalty that one of them reported.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:41 pm to RB10
The wr was off the line. Now did the wr signal to the lineman he wanted to be on the line…
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:42 pm to Diseasefreeforall
70 didnt have to report as eligible. Id like to hear from big Dan Skipper.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:42 pm to Diseasefreeforall
If 70 reports then 68 cannot report
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:43 pm to RB10
quote:
Ref in the booth was completely incorrect.
Ok so they just said that cambell was told that two ineligibles can’t report. If that’s true then nobody got fricked
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:43 pm to DaGarun
MELT DAN CAMBELL MELLLLLTTTT
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:43 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
70 didnt have to report as eligible. Id like to hear from big Dan Skipper.
Yeah but 70 got sent into the game and probably was told to tell the refs about 68, which confused the refs.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:44 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Ok so they just said that cambell was told that two ineligibles can’t report. If that’s true then nobody got fricked
70 didn’t report. That’s just what the refs told them.
You know, the people that fricked up.
70 was going nuts when the official announced that #68 didn’t report because he probably told the official that 68 was eligible:
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 10:45 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
Yeah but 70 got sent into the game and probably was told to tell the refs about 68, which confused the refs.
Ding
Ding
Ding
Page 36 of 44
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News