Started By
Message

re: LHSAA baseball brackets out: edit post your teams score

Posted on 5/15/18 at 11:37 am to
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Is winning the most important thing in high school sports?


Yes. That is why you play, to win... especially for a state championship game. If the state is going to let me throw the kid who gives me the best chance at that... then absolutely I am throwing him. There is virtually no difference in danger to a kid's arm between pitch number 124 and 127. Let him throw!
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53615 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 11:45 am to
Unfortunately high school coaches need to be monitored with pitch counts. Remember when the 5A tourney was three games in two days with no pitch count. That format was awful.

One thing they need to ban from the state tourney is artificial noisemakers. That 5A final was ridiculous.
This post was edited on 5/15/18 at 11:46 am
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Unfortunately high school coaches need to be monitored with pitch counts. One thing they need to ban from the state tourney is artificial noisemakers. That 5A final was ridiculous.


As for the pitch counts I'll say this:

Until they factor in warm-ups, pick offs, bullpen work, throws to bases to put runners out, throws when the kid plays second instead of pitches... etc, then pitch counts are stupid. You cannot sit here and tell me that a kid who throws 123 pitches is better off than a kid that throws 125... so why that number? I don't claim to have the answer to the problem, but I know a pitch limit isn't it. It has more to do with limiting the amount of time during the off-season hat a kid subjects his arm to stressful throws. There should be a limit to the amount of games a kid is allowed to play in a calendar year. MAKE them take the summer or winter off from baseball and play other sports.

As for the noise makers... get over it. This isn't golf!
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 12:57 pm to
Lets see your thoughts on the 3 game series. Here are some stats to help you out from the 2018 LHSAA Baseball Playoffs:

92 Series were played across all divisions
29 Series went to the third game
29/92= 32%

Of the 213 Total games played (in three game series)there were 53 run rule games and 12 games that went extra innings

Of the 29 series that went three games, 12 of them were won by teams that lost game one, and 17 were won by the team that won game one

In 17 of the 29 occurrences where it went to game three, the better seed had lost the first game

5 Teams made their respective State Title games that would have been eliminated had the series format not existed... including 2 teams that won their state championship.

Discuss

Posted by Riolobo
On the lake
Member since Mar 2017
5116 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 3:14 pm to
Barbe pitcher threw over 200 pitches against WM in 3 games. I can't remember his name but I do recall hearing he had major arm problems after. He pitched game one and game three of the championship series
This post was edited on 5/15/18 at 3:15 pm
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
33621 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:


LHSAA baseball brackets out: edit post your teams score
Barbe pitcher threw over 200 pitches against WM in 3 games. I can't remember his name but I do recall hearing he had major arm problems after. He pitched game one and game three of the championship series
bourgeois
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30231 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

There is virtually no difference in danger to a kid's arm between pitch number 124 and 127


I can't say that I have the talent or qualifications to say that is accurate or not....BUT I will say this.

If a coach and a parent is OK with their kid throwing 300 pitches in 3 days....who is the state to tell them not to do it. Now my kid would never do it. It would take all the bellyaching away too.....and if a kid gets hurt it's on the parent and the coach. Pretty simple really.
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I can't say that I have the talent or qualifications to say that is accurate or not....BUT I will say this.

If a coach and a parent is OK with their kid throwing 300 pitches in 3 days....who is the state to tell them not to do it. Now my kid would never do it. It would take all the bellyaching away too.....and if a kid gets hurt it's on the parent and the coach. Pretty simple really.


Im not saying the mandatory rest times shouldn't stand as written... just that "starting anew batter past 125 is a forfeit" seems dumb to me.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

You cannot sit here and tell me that a kid who throws 123 pitches is better off than a kid that throws 125... so why that number?


Because it has to be some number.

My assumption is that well-intentioned people came together, gave their input, and decided that it would be best to have the cutoff point at 125 pitches.

I also assume that MLB and associated organizations have studied the issue pretty thoroughly before posting their guidelines, which actually list 105 as the daily max in-game pitches for a 17-18 year old.

quote:

Until they factor in warm-ups, pick offs, bullpen work, throws to bases to put runners out, throws when the kid plays second instead of pitches... etc, then pitch counts are stupid.

What makes you think that stuff isn’t factored in? Excluding the playing second part, lol

quote:

don't claim to have the answer to the problem, but I know a pitch limit isn't it.

You know no such thing.
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Because it has to be some number.

My assumption is that well-intentioned people came together, gave their input, and decided that it would be best to have the cutoff point at 125 pitches.

I also assume that MLB and associated organizations have studied the issue pretty thoroughly before posting their guidelines, which actually list 105 as the daily max in-game pitches for a 17-18 year old.


I'm sure they have studied it, but a broad stroke rule doesn't factor in what each player is capable of. With a good off-day routine, and rest during the summer, an arm can withstand a lot of stress.

quote:

What makes you think that stuff isn’t factored in? Excluding the playing second part, lol


Because there is no way to quantify what it takes to get someone warm... that can vary from player to player, or day to day depending on weather. No way to know how many pickoffs a kid will attempt or comebackers he will have to wing over to first for the out.

quote:

You know no such thing.


Pitch counts became prominent in the 1980s, Stats LLC began tracking pitch counts in 1988 and MLB has kept data since 1999. At the same time, the rate of players having Tommy John surgery at the MLB and Minor League level since the first one in 1974, has risen from 12 total between 1974-1988 (.8 per year) to 623 such surgeries from 2000-2014 (41.5 per year). Note that the players at that level in the 2000s+ would have been in youth ball (approximately 8 years old) around when the idea of pitch counts was being implemented.

What changed? Lack of rest due to year around baseball? Lack of proper conditioning? Coddling of arms so as to limit stamina? Lack of mechanics resulting in more stress on the elbow? That's what I know. So when I say that pitch counts aren't the answer... I have a pretty solid argument.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

What changed? Lack of rest due to year around baseball? Lack of proper conditioning? Coddling of arms so as to limit stamina? Lack of mechanics resulting in more stress on the elbow? That's what I know. So when I say that pitch counts aren't the answer... I have a pretty solid argument

Okay, say you have a kid with perfect mechanics, on perfect rest, who plays the perfect amount of games each year. Would you let him throw 250 pitches in a day?

Why not? Because pitch counts are absolutely the answer to the question of how to protect arms on any given day, and they are also part of a long-term strategy to treat arms correctly.

I’m not discounting the stuff you’re saying, which is important, but don’t tell me pitch counts aren’t useful. Yes, it would be ideal, and hopefully is usually the case, that the pitcher and coaches work together to manage his particular arm regardless of the pitch count rules, but that doesn’t negate the need for a pitch count rule in general.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53477 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

'm sure they have studied it, but a broad stroke rule doesn't factor in what each player is capable of.
the Emerson Gibbs rule 2.0 was designed for the extreme situations. At higher levels, we see workhorses go up into the 120s all the time. Never do they go up into 180+ territory.
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Okay, say you have a kid with perfect mechanics, on perfect rest, who plays the perfect amount of games each year. Would you let him throw 250 pitches in a day?

Why not? Because pitch counts are absolutely the answer to the question of how to protect arms on any given day, and they are also part of a long-term strategy to treat arms correctly.

I’m not discounting the stuff you’re saying, which is important, but don’t tell me pitch counts aren’t useful. Yes, it would be ideal, and hopefully is usually the case, that the pitcher and coaches work together to manage his particular arm regardless of the pitch count rules, but that doesn’t negate the need for a pitch count rule in general.


Who the hell is talking about 250 in a day? That's an absurdity and bastardization of the issue we are discussing. There isn't a player alive that can thrown 250 and still be effective so the game itself would necessitate the removal of the pitcher. Don't throw out absurdities to try to sway this discussion your way.

Again, if a specified rest chart is used, I'm all for it. I'm all for getting away from baseball in the offseason. I'm not for telling a kid who might be playing his final game of baseball ever, that he can't stay in and try to win it, because he has passed some perceived threshold.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53477 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

m not for telling a kid who might be playing his final game of baseball ever, that he can't stay in and try to win it, because he has passed some perceived threshold.
he could go play another position after he leaves pitching. It is a team sport.

Don't we want our state championship teams to have pitching depth and not just rely on one guy?
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
23232 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:57 pm to
quote:


Is winning the most important thing in high school sports? At ND?






Yessssssssssssssssssss
Posted by SaturdayTraditions
Down Seven Bridges Rd
Member since Sep 2015
3380 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

he could go play another position after he leaves pitching. It is a team sport.

Don't we want our state championship teams to have pitching depth and not just rely on one guy?


As the player... I want the ball in my hand and the team on my back. Not to hide in right field, and you wouldn't be there if not for depth. Again I'm advocating for rest times, so another pitcher would have had to help you get there.
This post was edited on 5/15/18 at 5:03 pm
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13867 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 6:27 pm to
Any comments about the overall atmosphere/facilities in Sulphur? Should they keep the championship games there, or divide it up between different locations?
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61856 posts
Posted on 5/15/18 at 6:47 pm to
It’s perfect except the poles are massive and obstruct the views. You pretty much have to stand above the dugouts to have a clear view.
Posted by sportsaddit68
Hammond
Member since Sep 2008
6395 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 7:42 am to
FYI Everyone, The official response from LHSAA to STA (If I can get pics to work)





Posted by sf46
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2013
70 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 10:30 am to
The LHSAA carries out most of its rulings in a tyrannical and nazi-like manner. This complete disregard of the rules is unacceptable. The LHSAA has been losing credibility for years now. I've read many articles over the years where student athletes made "honest mistakes" and were declared ineligible and their teams forced to forfeit several games after the fact. The LHSAA even went after the schools for the gate fees. Livonia High School football from a few years ago comes to mind. Once the pitchers in these baseball games went over the pitch counts they became ineligible players. To not enforce the clear penalty as written in their own rules, shows a complete lack of integrity. LHSAA sucks!
This post was edited on 5/16/18 at 10:41 am
Jump to page
Page First 28 29 30 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 30 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram