- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LHSAA Email
Posted on 3/3/26 at 6:58 am
Posted on 3/3/26 at 6:58 am
An LHSAA email was sent out yesterday afternoon thanking principals for their participation in the meetings last week. Then in the last paragraph it was stated that the legislature was not pleased with what was passed. When the legislature meets later this month they will basically take over the LHSAA and open enrollment will take place for 9,10,11 grades. Then all schools will be select and the split is over. In some ways I agree and in some ways I don’t. So let the fun and transfers begin.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:06 am to elmo 57
The only entity in the world I’d want to run anything involving my kids less than the LHSAA may be the Louisiana legislature!
That said, I’m torn on this one. While I don’t want Wild West recruiting I also know that the LHSAA and its member schools have screwed the pooch with archaic, anti student rules for a very long time. Guess we’ll see where it goes
That said, I’m torn on this one. While I don’t want Wild West recruiting I also know that the LHSAA and its member schools have screwed the pooch with archaic, anti student rules for a very long time. Guess we’ll see where it goes
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:09 am to elmo 57
They passed the open eligibility for incoming 9th graders 169-168… what I want to know is does that apply if a kid is otherwise not supposed to be there?
And what happens if a zoned public school refuses to enforce its zone?
My next idea would be a rule where no select school may turn in a nonselect school over kids that don’t live in the zone… like if a Catholic League school turned somebody in how hypocritical would that be? I would even say make it to where only schools under the same district can turn each other in but that wouldn’t get support
I don’t see that rule lasting long
And what happens if a zoned public school refuses to enforce its zone?
My next idea would be a rule where no select school may turn in a nonselect school over kids that don’t live in the zone… like if a Catholic League school turned somebody in how hypocritical would that be? I would even say make it to where only schools under the same district can turn each other in but that wouldn’t get support
I don’t see that rule lasting long
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 7:17 am
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:19 am to chalmetteowl
We have given athletic departments far too much power over academic institutions. I’m starting to think the European model of not having athletics at schools beyond club level teams is the right way to go
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:27 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
And what happens if a zoned public school refuses to enforce its zone?
Haven't really read up on this ordeal but I wanted to comment on this. Many don't, because MFP (state tax funding) is based in some part of school population count. And what I've come to figure out in my time around school boards is that they, in general, not everyone but usually a majority of any board in conjunction with the super, would rather look the other way and take the $$ then remove kids who shouldn't be there. At least until Februaryish of each year.
That's before you ever get to the influence of athletics.
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 7:30 am
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:28 am to chalmetteowl
If school A reports a violation by school B…..
Both school A & B should be investigated for violations.
Keep it a level playing field.
Both school A & B should be investigated for violations.
Keep it a level playing field.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:49 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
They passed the open eligibility for incoming 9th graders 169-168… what I want to know is does that apply if a kid is otherwise not supposed to be there?
why would you need it if they are in zone? of course it applies if you are out of zone.
essentially if you can get the out of zone request to approve, you are eligible
quote:
And what happens if a zoned public school refuses to enforce its zone?
thats what out of zone exemption are
plenty of schools take out of zone kids. and in most places its not the school approving, its the school board.
quote:
I don’t see that rule lasting long
what do you mean?
I dont think you understand the rule, there is nothing to turn in
simple...if school or school board grants the out of zone request you are eligible. If you leave, you still have to sit out a year with the exception that if you attend a private school then transfer to the hs you are zoned for, you are immediately eligible
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:50 am to chalmetteowl
Your idea is dumb.
So just because a school is select, they shouldn’t be able to point out that a non-select school is playing with kids that shoudn’t be there?
Sounds like that school needs to be select too.
So just because a school is select, they shouldn’t be able to point out that a non-select school is playing with kids that shoudn’t be there?
Sounds like that school needs to be select too.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:55 am to elmo 57
yea i expect the legislature to not take over LHSAA but essentially the state will make them cooperate and do what they see fit as they are the ones paying the bill. this means 1 time transfer will happen for 9/10/11
i actually expect the freshman full eligibility to remain and the 1 time transfer tacked on top
so say you live in Kenner but work in Chalmette and want your kid to go to Chalmette high....you file out of zone and its granted....he is full eligible. Then going into his junior year...you get a huge promotion at work and can afford for him to go to Jesuit and they accept him. He transfers and is eligible immediately.
i actually expect the freshman full eligibility to remain and the 1 time transfer tacked on top
so say you live in Kenner but work in Chalmette and want your kid to go to Chalmette high....you file out of zone and its granted....he is full eligible. Then going into his junior year...you get a huge promotion at work and can afford for him to go to Jesuit and they accept him. He transfers and is eligible immediately.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:06 am to lsu777
quote:
so say you live in Kenner but work in Chalmette and want your kid to go to Chalmette high....you file out of zone and its granted....he is full eligible. Then going into his junior year...you get a huge promotion at work and can afford for him to go to Jesuit and they accept him. He transfers and is eligible immediately.
You give these pie in the sky examples but that probably represents less than 5% of actual situations.
It opens the door for nefarious recruiting situations for coaches/parents/kids to do shady shite.
It is fricking highschool sports, not professional. Whatever happened to playing for your school with your friends. figs like you who live their life through youth sports are the problem.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:23 am to slinger1317
quote:
You give these pie in the sky examples but that probably represents less than 5% of actual situations.
i was just giving an example explaining how it works
quote:
It opens the door for nefarious recruiting situations for coaches/parents/kids to do shady shite.
ok well then change my example to Jesuit recruits him to go there and he is eligible immediately I dont give a frick
quote:
It is fricking highschool sports, not professional.
exactly so why are you trying to control other families and tell them what is best for them and their kid
quote:
Whatever happened to playing for your school with your friends.
what if all their friends go to another school? again why do you care and why do you want to control everyone like you know best.
quote:
figs like you who live their life through youth sports are the problem.
yea i live through youth sports
you literally think because we talk about subjects on here people live only for that. dumbass
let me give you a better example that is more likely to happen....the back up Qb who is a junior at West Monroe but sitting behind someone in his own class....they transfer to an Oak Grove or Sterlington to become the starter
the rule would hurt a school like Barbe or sam houston in baseball because if a kid isnt starting going into junior year...they are going to leave. it will kill depth but it will help the small schools....that is far far far more likely than true recruiting because those schools are mainly getting the best players to move to that district anyways.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:37 am to lsu777
quote:
exactly so why are you trying to control other families and tell them what is best for them and their kid
This is what I have a problem with. I'm not trying to control anyone, I just want everyone to play by the rules.
If you choose to go to public school, then live somewhere you want your kids to go. Don't live in one area then try to put them in school somewhere else because sports. This culture of "my kid and his highschool athletic career are the most important thing" is insane.
Previously you say to poor performing schools. "Do better." That sounds great and all but what can a parent do to make a public school better in the limited window his kids will be there. The parents should have made the decision to live in the district they wanted their kids to go to. And if they can't do that, then too bad. The kid should stay and play in his district.
We have already seen what free transfers have done to college sports, and it will trickle down to highschool. This culture of doing whatever you can for your kids to maximize highschool playing time is ridiculous. You are teaching your kids horrible values and priorities.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:49 am to slinger1317
quote:
This is what I have a problem with. I'm not trying to control anyone, I just want everyone to play by the rules.
the rule is changing like or not because this is all part of the push from the state for full school choice.
quote:
If you choose to go to public school, then live somewhere you want your kids to go. Don't live in one area then try to put them in school somewhere else because sports. This culture of "my kid and his highschool athletic career are the most important thing" is insane.
it isnt the most important thing. but you realize they could be doing it for academics too? many times kids want to go to the better school but cant because they dont want to lose eligibility for athletics
and again...HS is a 1 time thing. let them go where they feel is best
quote:
Previously you say to poor performing schools. "Do better." That sounds great and all but what can a parent do to make a public school better in the limited window his kids will be there. The parents should have made the decision to live in the district they wanted their kids to go to. And if they can't do that, then too bad. The kid should stay and play in his district.
again....you hold the school accountable through the school board
and you realize school zones change right?
quote:
We have already seen what free transfers have done to college sports,
what has it done that is so bad? what...they can transfer just like regular students can?
you and I as traditionalist may not like it. but taking emotion out of it, its allowed way more teams to compete, its allowed kids to move for more playing time. The only thing that could be an issue is the buying of players but that will not be an issue at HS level, nobody cares enough to stroke a 50k check for a kid to come to a school
and the college game is more popular that ever before according to ratings
quote:
it will trickle down to highschool
what will? allowing way way more schools to be competitive than were before? again...lets take barbe baseball for example...last year they had I think 4 guys who didnt play but are playing in juco right now...do you think those kids would have liked to have the ability to transfer to a St Louis or a Westlake or a Grand lake etc....yea they would have. You will see a lot more kids leave the big schools because they are not starting than you will see the big schools snatching the 1 good kid from a small school.
quote:
This culture of doing whatever you can for your kids to maximize highschool playing time is ridiculous. You are teaching your kids horrible values and priorities.
i agree somewhat but again....I dont know each families specific reasoning for each so let them go where they feel is best
but also I understand a kid gets 1 shot at this...1. so why are we forcing archaic rules on them because "thats how its always been done?"
in the end...doesnt matter what you or I think. the freshman eligibility rule has already passed and 1 time transfer is coming, like it or not.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:51 am to slinger1317
quote:
This culture of "my kid and his highschool athletic career are the most important thing" is insane.
This is why great high school coaches are quitting in droves. Parents are running it. So you end up with bad humans/coaches and parents feel even more entitled.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:00 am to lsu777
quote:
but also I understand a kid gets 1 shot at this...1. so why are we forcing archaic rules on them because "thats how its always been done?"
Because it is more than about 1 kids experience. High School athletics are about building a program and biding your time and earning your shot. 1 time transfer goes against all of that. Sorry you didn't get to play in HS. If coach would have just given you a chance y'all would have won state right?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:02 am to elmo 57
so if a kid can choose any school that he or she wants for ATHLETIC purposes.....
then can a school DENY any kid they want because the kid is very low academically and does NOT play sports and it will not effect the schools funding?
only seems fair, right?
then can a school DENY any kid they want because the kid is very low academically and does NOT play sports and it will not effect the schools funding?
only seems fair, right?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:05 am to elmo 57
Louisiana legislators getting involved in this won’t end well
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:07 am to lsu777
quote:
what if all their friends go to another school?

Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:10 am to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Because it is more than about 1 kids experience. High School athletics are about building a program and biding your time and earning your shot. 1 time transfer goes against all of that. Sorry you didn't get to play in HS. If coach would have just given you a chance y'all would have won state right?
trust me I played. this isnt about me nor my kids.
none and i mean absolutely none of this affects me at all
your reasoning is 1 kid should absolutely hate his high school experience or at the very least, not do what he feels is best for him and his future....because he needs to sacrifice for the good of the program and the other kids? Would you do that with your job? someone offers you a better job...are you going to just pass it up because of some loyalty to your co-workers?
many of yall are way way too emotional about this, caught up in "the way its always been done" or "fairness" instead of letting the kid and family choose.
guess you hate school choice too right? how dare someone try to go to a better academic school?
and again...how can yall not see this is all part of clearing the path for full on school choice? and how can other states manage to have these rules in place and everything be fine...but little ole Louisiana cant do it?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:10 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
We have given athletic departments far too much power over academic institutions. I’m starting to think the European model of not having athletics at schools beyond club level teams is the right way to go
I think we’re heading that direction anyway with the rise of club sports we’re seeing.
Here’s my only concern (not that I disagree with the idea but just a concern) as a teacher and coach at the high school level. Having these sports compete at the school level allows for better synergy between school and athletics and trying to enforce a healthy balance (grade requirements for participation, etc.). I know a lot of schools only loosely enforce those but still, it’s something. I’m already seeing kids have a lot of issues figuring out how to balance extra curriculars with school work. Having clubs take over athletics completely is only going to make that worse I think.
Like I said, overall I think it’s better in the long run for the two to separate. There’s just potential issues I would like to see worked out.
Popular
Back to top

7







