- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let's discuss Romeo Crennell's decisions at the end of the game
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:15 pm
Two decisions
1- with under two minutes left up 1, decides to go for it on 4th down instead of kicking the FG because their D has been a sieve. They convert and go up by 7
2- decides to go for two, converting wins the game. Not converting, Tenn would still need a TD. They fail.
I personally think both were the correct call, just didn't work out. In fact, the fact that Tenn scored so easily reinforces the decision of going for two to seal the game.
Tennessee went on to win the game in OT.
10
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:17 pm to castorinho
Both were correct calls
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:17 pm to castorinho
I would have made the same calls.
It didn’t work out but that doesn’t mean they were poor decisions.
It didn’t work out but that doesn’t mean they were poor decisions.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:17 pm to castorinho
#1 was clearly the correct call
I would have no real problem either way for #2 but I like the aggressiveness
I would have no real problem either way for #2 but I like the aggressiveness
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:18 pm to castorinho
Anyone disagreeing with the decision to go for 2 up 7 at that stage of the game is the same person that doesn’t understand why when you are down 14 you should go for 2 after scoring the first TD.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:24 pm to castorinho
quote:
personally think both were the correct call
I would’ve kicked the PAT to go up by 8.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:31 pm to castorinho
I thought his calls were questionable but at 1-4 this season, why not stay aggressive. All I know is I picked TN for Survivor and I was gripped!!!
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:42 pm to castorinho
I thought he should have called timeout when Henry lined up in the wildcat at the end. They did not have a stacked box and I thought the wrong personnel in at the time.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 3:51 pm to castorinho
1-4 record. Play to win the game. Correct calls.
Helps set a winning mindset in the players that their coach wants to win and believes in the team.
Helps set a winning mindset in the players that their coach wants to win and believes in the team.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:07 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Both were correct calls
The decision to go for 2 was... stupid. It supposedly may have been the correct call from an analytics standpoint... but it was stupid.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:12 pm to SSpaniel
Because it didn’t work?
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:13 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I would have kicked the PAT. Put the onus on the other team to try and convert a 50/50 play.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:14 pm to AgCoug
Number one was the right call no matter what, but at the time, number two was foolish and has been proven so.
If you fail you made bad decisions, plain and simple. No one says “they lost, but they made good decisions” nor do they say “well they won but they didn’t make good decisions”.
quote:
It didn’t work out but that doesn’t mean they were poor decisions.
If you fail you made bad decisions, plain and simple. No one says “they lost, but they made good decisions” nor do they say “well they won but they didn’t make good decisions”.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:14 pm to PillPusher
quote:
I would have kicked the PAT. Put the onus on the other team to try and convert a 50/50 play.
I prefer to put the onus on my team to win the game and not put it in the hands of my defense that couldn’t stop a nose bleed
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:14 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Because it didn’t work?
No. Because it was dumb.
That being said, I'm happy he made such a dumb call.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:15 pm to SSpaniel
Why
Posted on 10/18/20 at 4:27 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
I prefer to put the onus on my team to win the game and not put it in the hands of my defense that couldn’t stop a nose bleed
Yeah the defense sucks, it was the right call to win in regulation
Posted on 10/18/20 at 5:30 pm to castorinho
I would have kicked the pat. Make the titans go for two to tie the game,
Posted on 10/18/20 at 5:34 pm to noonan
Going for two told your defense they were trash. So when you missed it, you basically told them to frick off.
Posted on 10/18/20 at 5:37 pm to castorinho
I absolutely love going for 2 to make it a 9 score game.
There's been two games the last two weeks where teams scored a TD to go up 15 midway through the 4th and both times they kicked the extra point to go up 16. Makes no sense.
Go for 2 and if you convert it's a 17 point 3 score game and basically over. Even if you miss it's 15 and the other team would still have to convert one 2 point conversion to tie it.
There's been two games the last two weeks where teams scored a TD to go up 15 midway through the 4th and both times they kicked the extra point to go up 16. Makes no sense.
Go for 2 and if you convert it's a 17 point 3 score game and basically over. Even if you miss it's 15 and the other team would still have to convert one 2 point conversion to tie it.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News