Started By
Message

re: Jack vs Tiger

Posted on 4/2/25 at 7:46 am to
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16599 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 7:46 am to
No one has to get sucked into an either, or. Jack had his own era and played at a time when the PGA was being formed. He was a steady player and his second-place finishes in majors and other tourneys are almost as amazing as all the wins. Tiger's records on so much of the game that don't include all his wins are more than amazing. Many will never be broken.

This is even a discussion because Tiger didn't have health even at a very young age. He lost his age 30 decade, for the most part, and still has 82 PGA wins—that's crazy good. When Tiger played, he was so much better than anyone coming in second during this time. Tiger would have easily had over 100 PGA wins and 25 majors if he could have enjoyed decent health. That is golf dominance, the likes of which we will never see again.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
15571 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Who gives a shite about the peak? Throughout their entire history of their careers, Jack is better.
I mean Tiger’s career essentially ended in 2013 due to injuries. If he’d retired then this would be as nonsensical a statement as it gets. All but 1 of his majors occurred in a 12 year span before his body started breaking down and his personal turmoil. He’d have Tiger-proofed all of Jack’s records if he wasn’t closer to an android at 30

Tiger’s the superior and it’s not particularly close. Sorry geezer
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 8:27 am
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
41670 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:39 am to
If Tiger would have left his swing alone, he'd probably have Jack beat in every category.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
41670 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Give Jack modern clubs and he is the GOAT.


Jack didn't have modern clubs during the time he played? The frick was he playing with? The flintstones club? A stick with rock tied to it?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
51872 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:51 am to
quote:

think Phil is arguably at 1

last amateur to win on tour, oldest major champ ever
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
38644 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Jack is a better person. Tiger is a better golfer. Anyone who says different to either of those propositions is kidding themselves.

No one will ever touch prime Tige


Who is the better person has nothing to do with it nor does who's prime was the best. Not many will argue that Jacks prime was better than Tigers, but when considering who's the goat, you don't just take their prime. Jack's resume is just better, anyone who says different to that is kidding themselves.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37563 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:03 am to
Tiger is the best player of all time. I don't think anyone can really argue otherwise.

Jack has the GOAT career at this point and I don't think anyone can really argue that, either. Tiger was on pace to shatter it all, but the last 15 years have been an adventure
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37563 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:05 am to
quote:

He lost his age 30 decade


Yea, it is kind of wild to think about him not having the decade you are "supposed" to be in your golfing prime
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
30938 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:10 am to
quote:

last amateur to win on tour


Nope
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16599 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Yea, it is kind of wild to think about him not having the decade you are "supposed" to be in your golfing prime


You must be thinking about the multiple major knee surgeries and at least 5 major back surgeries, including a spine fusion that cost at least a decade of competition. Then being out for so long and now in his 40s, goes out and wins the Masters for the 5th time. Tigers' 30s, in perfect health, would have been unlike anything the record books have ever recorded.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34658 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:25 am to
Jack Nicklaus: “In 1930, there were perhaps ten golfers, pro or amateur, who might defeat Bob Jones when everything was right for them. After my first few years as a pro, there were maybe 30 guys who could beat me if I wasn't playing my best. If I were out there today (1998), that number would be tripled.”
This post was edited on 4/2/25 at 9:26 am
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37563 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:30 am to
Yea, that Masters win was one of the most remarkable things i've ever seen. It really felt like going back in time, just how it all unfolded that Sunday. Buddies and I were going bonkers watching.

We kind of felt at the time that would be the last time we saw that kind of play from him. I'd love to get it one more time, but at this point I just don't see how that is possible.
Posted by Muahahaha
Ohio
Member since Nov 2005
6527 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Give Jack modern clubs and he is the GOAT.


I'd love to see Jack in his prime with modern-day equipment! His driving distance would have been insane. It would be amazing to see both of them in their prime, head-to-head. People often forget that Jack was clutch in key moments, just like Tiger was during his prime.

Ultimately, it's a matter of perspective: If you prioritize major championships and longevity, Jack Nicklaus is the clear winner. If you value peak dominance, career wins, and influence on the game, Tiger Woods has a strong case.

Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
30938 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Give Jack modern clubs and he is the GOAT.


Jack would be less dominant with modern equipment. Modern equipment brings the field together, not separate it. Hitting the middle of the face and being punished for bad shots has all been eliminated for pros with modern balls and club heads.

Grab a balata and a 175cc driver head and hit it 8mm on the toe against a modern driver and see what happens
Posted by tigre704
Member since Nov 2018
1840 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 9:56 am to
Jack is the goat. The PGA tour wouldn’t exist without him. 86 is one of the greatest sporting moments of all time. But tiger is just the better competitor and golfer. Everyone talks about 18 vs 15 but no one talks about Tiger surpassing his wins record in half the time it took Jack.

The fact that it’s even a debate when one guy has basically a 15 year stretch vs 3 decades..
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
30938 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Jack is the goat. The PGA tour wouldn’t exist without him.


They wouldn’t be giving away $10MM+ every week without Tiger
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
37678 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Grab a balata and a 175cc driver head and hit it 8mm on the toe against a modern driver and see what happens


And playing with older technology forged irons.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
38644 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

The fact that it’s even a debate when one guy has basically a 15 year stretch vs 3 decades..


That's the reason it is a debate One has the better resume and one had the better peak.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
59758 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 10:59 am to
Tiger is my favorite, Jack is the GOAT
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104768 posts
Posted on 4/2/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Give Jack modern clubs and he is the GOAT.
Sigh

Tiger would have been more dominant if the equipment was dated when he played
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram