1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would teams from years ago do in today’s NFL?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:12 pm to Mushroom1968
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:12 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:You think one week of film catches up an entire nfl offense?
So a team traveling in the future doesn’t have a week to watch film on the dreaded inverted cover 2 or rotating safeties?
It’s taken multiple years for the offenses to adapt to the defensive changes we have seen the last few years
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:13 pm to lsupride87
Those aren’t facts and it’s totally irrelevant. You don’t know what you’re talking about, what you’re doing is speaking in slogans you saw on TikTok or some idiot ok YouTube. You don’t know anything about football
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:
2026-two high shell
Drew Brees cried when teams played this against him. Brady just gave up,
Muh 2 high shell
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:14 pm to Madking
quote:ok
Those aren’t facts
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s taken multiple years for the offenses to adapt to the defensive changes we have seen the last few years
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:17 pm to lsupride87
Saying man is played 100% more back then than it is now is saying it’s never played now which is false. If you can’t even do simple math you should stay away from stats.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:17 pm to Mushroom1968
What do you think happened to Stafford in 2022, 2023, and 2024?
Father Time caught him and then let him go in 2025?
No, like every other QB, their stats hit a fricking wall with the new schemes. It’s slowly , like always, being figured out. It’s exactly what the nfl and football does, it’s an evolving game where one side moves forward and wins for years and then the other side evolves and the other side of the circle is met
Father Time caught him and then let him go in 2025?
No, like every other QB, their stats hit a fricking wall with the new schemes. It’s slowly , like always, being figured out. It’s exactly what the nfl and football does, it’s an evolving game where one side moves forward and wins for years and then the other side evolves and the other side of the circle is met
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:18 pm to Madking
quote:
Saying man is played 100% more back then than it is now is saying it’s never played now which is false
You were great at math weren’t you?
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:18 pm to Mushroom1968
He literally has no clue what he’s saying. He’s repeating things he has no clue about.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:19 pm to lsupride87
You’re a retard
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:19 pm to Madking
quote:dude
You’re a retard
Something used to be done 60% of the time that is now down 30% of the time means “it used to be done 100% more”
Check a math textbook brother
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:29 pm to lsupride87
If you actually knew basic math you’d know schematics in football are finite but you’re so stupid you think shell 2 is some breakthrough evolution when it’s actually been around forever.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:31 pm to Madking
quote:Way to pivot from not knowing math at all and aggressively shining your arse to acting like that never happened
If you actually knew basic math you’d know schematics in football are finite but you’re so stupid you think shell 2 is some breakthrough evolution when it’s actually been around forever.
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:49 pm to lsupride87
No you wanted to deflect and focus on something I said was irrelevant because your argument can’t go any further than “muh modern equals more advanced”
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:53 pm to Madking
I love how over time to some people sports transcends everything else and somehow doesn’t advance and somehow stays the same or even gets worse
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:57 pm to lsupride87
It’s cyclical you retard. The fact that the NFL is moving back under center at an extremely high rate over the past 3-4 seasons and Fullbacks rates are more than doubling during that span would suggest that modernity is moving backwards towards archaic and simplistic football in your framing of reality. To say your logic is flawed would be too generous because you aren’t even using logic. Sloganeering isn’t an argument.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 5:11 pm to Madking
Please tell me you are comparing today’s offense under center to back in the day
Bills run a shite ton of under center 12 and 13 personnel , which was common according to you and “cyclical”
The routes and plays they run out of that would blow the fricking minds of coordinators in the 80s and 90s….
Bills run a shite ton of under center 12 and 13 personnel , which was common according to you and “cyclical”
The routes and plays they run out of that would blow the fricking minds of coordinators in the 80s and 90s….
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 5:13 pm to lsupride87
Again, no argument, deflecting and zero knowledge of football.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 5:15 pm to lsupride87
quote:
The routes and plays they run out of that would blow the fricking minds of coordinators in the 80s and 90s….
What routes and plays are those? You don’t know what you’re talking about.
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 10/31/26 at 5:16 pm to Madking
I am quite literally the only one who has brought statistical facts on the changing nature of defenses, and you just use platitudes and butcher basic math
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 5:16 pm
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News