Started By
Message

re: Houston Rockets vs. LA Clippers | Game 6 | 9:30 (CT) on ESPN | LAC 3-2

Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:37 am to
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:37 am to
Can't believe some of the stuff these clowns post. Based on something totally subjective like a players percent health, the clips are objectively better.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Based on something totally subjective like a players percent health, the clips are objectively better.


Boom acting like the odds of LAC winning doesn't change whether Paul is injured and never plays or was never injured and fully healthy.

The Boom Effect!!!
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 11:42 am
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74881 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:41 am to
jesus...
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:41 am to
Yea those metrics are based on things like point differential. Well guess what HOU had the 2nd most missed games of any team in the league due to Injury. So if you wanna go by numbers that don't reflect the team HOU has today be my guest.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:42 am to
quote:

jesus...
Summed it up perfectly
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:42 am to
It does change but leave it to you to say Paul was only 90% when he puts up 20/10 and they still lose.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:43 am to
quote:

It does change
So I'm a clown for having a thought that you agree with. Awesome.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:45 am to
Youre a clown for using 100%. Paul won't be 100% this series. You saying 100% is just leaving yourself an out for when they Lose. Paul could have a great game and you'll say oh he wasn't fully healthy so that why HOU didn't lose.
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 11:45 am
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27486 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:47 am to
Houston doesn't lose game 1 if Paul plays. They Trojan Horsed us. Team played much differently without Paul, and it took the Rockets 3 halves to finally adjust. I definitely think our coaching deserves blame for that, but the Clippers have never pushed up the court that quickly with Paul running the point because he demands the ball after the rebound every time.
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 11:47 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Paul could have a great game and you'll say oh he wasn't fully healthy so that why HOU didn't lose.
YOu're just willy nilly making stuff up to prove some random point.

Like I said, you agreed with my premise, because it was obvious and everyone would agree with it, and yet somehow called me a clown for...who knows what reasons.

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Houston doesn't lose game 1 if Paul plays.
LAC sweeps the Rockets if Paul never gets hurt.

See how easy and irrelevand and unproductive that is?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:51 am to
Be use you're a well known Paul-tArd and will make excuses for him. That's something everybody will agree with. You can't say if Paul is fully healthy the clippers are objectively better when you know Paul won't be fully healthy. You already have a built in excuse for when you're wrong.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27486 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:51 am to
The Rockets split the season series when Paul played all 4 games, but none of this matters. It will all be settled in a the coming days.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
46021 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:52 am to
I actually understand what you're saying for the most part, but you were making the rust excuse during and after game 1 a lot. I agree that if Houston wins, regardless of Paul's health that should be celebrated but if you think Paul's health isn't a more legitimate excuse than rust I don't know what you're smoking.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Be use you're a well known Paul-tArd and will make excuses for him
Rust!!!

quote:

You can't say if Paul is fully healthy the clippers are objectively better when you know Paul won't be fully healthy. You already have a built in excuse for when you're wrong.
I said they're the favorite to win the series. You can check virtually any of the valued sites out there to see who had the better odds to win the title after round 1, LAC had much better odds than HOU, so yet again, I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:56 am to
Rust is a reason. Pauls health is an excuse. Big difference between a reason and an excuse.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:56 am to
quote:

The Rockets split the season series when Paul played all 4 games, but none of this matters
Not being an a-hole but i have no clue why you're telling me this or what it's supposed to mean.

It's irrelevant.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
46021 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:56 am to
quote:


Rust is a reason. Pauls health is an excuse. Big difference between a reason and an excuse.



This is one of the dumbest things I've read on this site.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Rust is a reason. Pauls health is an excuse
Back into UnknownKnight territory!!!

I bet your buddy SwaggerCopter isn't willing to follow you down that path, he's gonna let you drown alone this time.
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 11:58 am
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59926 posts
Posted on 5/7/15 at 11:58 am to
Odds are from objective. If LSU is favored by 3 v bama are they objectively better? Hell no.
Jump to page
Page First 49 50 51 52 53 ... 141
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 51 of 141Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram