- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Friday CFB: Virginia Tech at #7 Miami - ESPN / Washington at Rutgers - Fox
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to RB10
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to RB10
quote:
I’m pretty sure the only reason they ruled it a TD was so it could be reviewed, like someone else pointed out.
This makes no sense. That play is getting reviewed either way
0
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to Bengalbio
I made money off Miami winning, but I definitely think VT got screwed. I think vt really won even though I was pulling for the canes
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
I’m 80% sure it wasn’t a catch so I’m not super outraged but I did want VT to win
Everyone in this thread who is outraged just wanted Miami to lose.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to Lazy But Talented
quote:
People forget that you have to have full control of the ball until you hand the ball back to the ref.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:43 pm to OK Roughneck
Former pac 12 teams now in the big ten are 1-3 in conference
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:43 pm to tgrgrd00
Old man yelling at cloud:
Rutgers - Is it really legal to have the new blinking LED lights during a timeout? The Rutgers light show is excessive and dare I say unfair during a timeout as teams are trying to huddle up. The Rutgers lights flash on and off and at some point goes completely black out for seconds at a time.
Rutgers - Is it really legal to have the new blinking LED lights during a timeout? The Rutgers light show is excessive and dare I say unfair during a timeout as teams are trying to huddle up. The Rutgers lights flash on and off and at some point goes completely black out for seconds at a time.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:45 pm to AutoYes_Clown
May listen to the vt post game call in show
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:45 pm to The Quiet One
quote:
Gotta get real referees at this level
There are none at any level in any sport.
They are about self preservation and adhering to their ‘league’s call.
IYKYK
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:48 pm to pioneerbasketball
East of the rockies you ae on the air
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:48 pm to Tiger Ryno
First time caller
Long time listener
Long time listener
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:49 pm to jlovel7
quote:
ACC made a business decision there.
Literally all scripted theater amongst the big players in literally every major marketable sport. Clown theater. And here we are discussing it. We always will.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:51 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Everyone in this thread who is outraged just wanted Miami to lose
And you just want to be a contrarian
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm to lsupride87
I hope you have plenty of tissue handy then.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm to Drank
quote:That stadium might have burned down tonight if it went the other way.
ACC made a business decision there.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 11:09 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Henry Jones Jr
U smart
Posted on 9/27/24 at 11:09 pm to tigeroarz1
The ACC really screwed that up badly. Someone needs to lose their job over that.
I freely admit during the game I wanted VT to win, but forget that for now.
I don't really know if the guy caught it or not- but that's what they ruled on the field. Walk-off touchdown.
To overturn it on replay, you need incontrovertible proof it WASN'T a catch. They looked at it for 5 minutes, and every angle I saw, I couldn't tell if the guy had the ball or not.
Remember, you are NOT looking to confirm he made the catch, you are looking for proof he DIDN'T. Otherwise, play stands as called.
After staring at it a long time, the ref comes out and says "overturned, incomplete". Ok, explain why. They didn't.
If you are ruling he did not have control on the way to the ground, and the defender took control of the ball- say that. If you are saying player went out of bounds before control- say that.
You can't just say overturned, incomplete and run off the field.
I freely admit during the game I wanted VT to win, but forget that for now.
I don't really know if the guy caught it or not- but that's what they ruled on the field. Walk-off touchdown.
To overturn it on replay, you need incontrovertible proof it WASN'T a catch. They looked at it for 5 minutes, and every angle I saw, I couldn't tell if the guy had the ball or not.
Remember, you are NOT looking to confirm he made the catch, you are looking for proof he DIDN'T. Otherwise, play stands as called.
After staring at it a long time, the ref comes out and says "overturned, incomplete". Ok, explain why. They didn't.
If you are ruling he did not have control on the way to the ground, and the defender took control of the ball- say that. If you are saying player went out of bounds before control- say that.
You can't just say overturned, incomplete and run off the field.
.jpg)
Posted on 9/27/24 at 11:11 pm to pioneerbasketball
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 11:56 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
I’m 80% sure it wasn’t a catch so I’m not super outraged but I did want VT to win
So you’re saying you aren’t definitive.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 4:20 am to Scoob
quote:
The ACC really screwed that up badly. Someone needs to lose their job over that.
I freely admit during the game I wanted VT to win, but forget that for now.
I don't really know if the guy caught it or not- but that's what they ruled on the field. Walk-off touchdown.
To overturn it on replay, you need incontrovertible proof it WASN'T a catch. They looked at it for 5 minutes, and every angle I saw, I couldn't tell if the guy had the ball or not.
Remember, you are NOT looking to confirm he made the catch, you are looking for proof he DIDN'T. Otherwise, play stands as called.
After staring at it a long time, the ref comes out and says "overturned, incomplete". Ok, explain why. They didn't.
If you are ruling he did not have control on the way to the ground, and the defender took control of the ball- say that. If you are saying player went out of bounds before control- say that.
You can't just say overturned, incomplete and run off the field.
he clearly did not maintain control after coming down with it. its clear as day in the replay
Page 52 of 53
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News