2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ever looked up Chucks stats
Posted on 7/25/26 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 7/25/26 at 11:12 pm
6”5 and is known as pf. His 76 years isn’t known from my generation. 26 9 without assist steals and blocks.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:12 am to slutiger5
That post reads like you were in the cups.
In any event if you want to see peak Sir Charles, watch the '93 finals against Chicago (with Phoenix) or the '92 Olympic Games.
His rookie year in Philly was pretty special too when he was playing with Moses Malone and Dr. J.
In any event if you want to see peak Sir Charles, watch the '93 finals against Chicago (with Phoenix) or the '92 Olympic Games.
His rookie year in Philly was pretty special too when he was playing with Moses Malone and Dr. J.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:36 am to Obtuse1
He had to fight for boards with Malone? At the size and the speed, highly underrated for my generation to understand. Can’t pass but can’t start and run break.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 1:52 am to slutiger5
quote:
He had to fight for boards with Malone?
Moses taught him how much easier it is to fight for boards if you are standing on the other guy's foot.
Barkley also has an innate understanding of the physics and geometry of rebounding, a lot like Rodman. They both used this to be where the ball was going to be versus using height and strength (though both were known for strength). Both of them had late growth spurts so they learned to rebound against much taller opponents.
The other thing to know about Sir Charles was that he played much better than his stats, like most great players. He seemed to be able to will wins. His "problem" is he met MJ and the complete Bulls in his only finals appearance. That was an epic finals even though it only went 6 (thanks John Paxson
) Sub out MJ for any other SG playing at the time and the Suns would have swept the Bulls. Posted on 7/26/26 at 7:26 am to Obtuse1
quote:
Moses taught him how much easier it is to fight for boards if you are standing on the other guy's foot.
That's part of what is missed by stats; the "dirty" physicality of the game in that era was through the roof. It's part of why comparing players across eras is pretty pointless.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:11 am to slutiger5
stats and height won't tell you how incredibly fast and strong Chuck was or how long his arms arm. watch highlights and pay attention to his speed and girth.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:39 pm to faraway
When he was asked how he would do playing against today's players : " they would score 30 on me. But I would score 50 on them".
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:45 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
When he was asked how he would do playing against today's players : " they would score 30 on me. But I would score 50 on them".
Question… I was too young to really watch Barkley’s prime. What was his usual shooting distance?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 3:03 pm to faraway
quote:
stats and height won't tell you how incredibly fast and strong Chuck was or how long his arms arm. watch highlights and pay attention to his speed and girth.
He was an NBA quality ball-handler too, which for his size is amazing.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 3:24 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Question… I was too young to really watch Barkley’s prime. What was his usual shooting distance?
Very high percentage of in the paint shots. The kind of shooter that was more comfortable when he was shooting after contact. I don't know that it was that he was uncomfortable at mid-range he just knew the shots were always there for him under the basket. He was a very efficient shooter in his prime. Late in his career, he became enamoured with the 3 point shot. He was never very good (kinda like his golf game), but he loved to run the floor and pull up, since no one guarded him that far out, he got to stop for a dramatic pause. While he hit maybe 25% of the time, it was almost always a dagger when he did.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:56 pm to faraway
quote:
Chuck was or how long his arms arm
He played so long.
He throw his hup into someone to further put the ball away from the opposing player and his hands.
Played with great leverage and would had great insight for where the ball would be.
Played within his range shot wise.
I used to try to emulate his style. Similar build. I show his highlights to my son who loves playing and we work the post in practice and use him for a reference point.
Play to.your strength.
Play within yourself.
Know the floor layout and shot range and live there.
Play with hustle and anger.
I loved watching him play.
Posted on 7/27/26 at 3:41 am to Obtuse1
quote:
His rookie year in Philly was pretty special too when he was playing with Moses Malone and Dr. J.
The Round Mound of Rebound definitely brought a young energy to an aging 76ers team. He was fun to watch in Philly. Nothing like watching him taking it full court when he was heavier. Big man could move too.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 3:42 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 8:19 am to mdomingue
quote:
That's part of what is missed by stats; the "dirty" physicality of the game in that era was through the roof. It's part of why comparing players across eras is pretty pointless.
Saw a video of Byron Scott talking about going up against Kurt Rambis in practice. Said Rambis threw a hard illegal screen on him. He told him not to do that again. Next time, he checked the shite out of him again. Then he did it again and Byron pitched a fit. Rambis told him, those are the same exact screens I am setting for you in games.
Byron said, oh, cool.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 8:20 am
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:38 am to Obtuse1
quote:Jeez
His rookie year in Philly was pretty special too when he was playing with Moses Malone and Dr. J.
Did all the old goats team up? How have so many legends had such great teammates when it’s looked down upon now?
Posted on 7/27/26 at 9:45 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Question… I was too young to really watch Barkley’s prime. What was his usual shooting distance?
Barkley was taking it to the rack or backing you down and mashing you in the paint.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:16 pm to Obtuse1
Obtuse - yes sir.
Posted on 8/2/26 at 10:03 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Moses taught him how much easier it is to fight for boards if you are standing on the other guy's foot. Barkley also has an innate understanding of the physics and geometry of rebounding, a lot like Rodman. They both used this to be where the ball was going to be versus using height and strength (though both were known for strength). Both of them had late growth spurts so they learned to rebound against much taller opponents. The other thing to know about Sir Charles was that he played much better than his stats, like most great players. He seemed to be able to will wins. His "problem" is he met MJ and the complete Bulls in his only finals appearance. That was an epic finals even though it only went 6 (thanks John Paxson ) Sub out MJ for any other SG playing at the time and the Suns would have swept the Bulls.
Yes sir.
Rodman is unheard of but I see similarities getting to the ball between the 2. Rodman is the greatest role player ever. While chuck somehow chose basketball instead of football. No on ever intimidated him or told him to play a certain position other than Moses Malone. Imo he’s the most underrated player in the 80/90s. Just my ignorance.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News